Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:43:14.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 15 - Foreign Accent in L2 Japanese

Cross-Sectional Study

from Part IV - Accentedness and Acoustic Features

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

By
Kaori Idemaru ,
Misaki Kato  and
Kimiko Tsukada
Edited by
Ratree Wayland
Ratree Wayland
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Accents in second language speech have multiple perceptual consequences, including breakdown in communication and undesirable judgements about accented speakers. Whereas perceived accents are likely influenced by various acoustic variables, it is not clear which acoustic variables influence the perceived accents the most and whether such important predictors of accents change as learners’ proficiency develops. Here we report a study that has examined acoustic sources of foreign accent in second language Japanese produced by American learners at different instructional levels, including beginning and intermediate late learners and early bilinguals. We collected speech samples from these learners as well as a control group of native speakers, and measured 27 segmental and prosodic variables. These acoustic variables were related to accent rating scores obtained from native listeners. Confirmatory analyses showed that 24 out of 27 variables tested were reliably associated with listeners’ accentedness judgements. Exploratory analyses showed that prosodic features were most predictive of beginning to intermediate late learners’ accents, whereas vowel features were most predictive of early bilinguals’ accents. These results shed light on issues related to the acoustic sources of foreign accent and the development of second language speech.

Keywords

ForeignAccentL2JapaneseCross-SectionalEnglishDevelopmentSpeech
Type
Chapter
Information
Second Language Speech Learning
Theoretical and Empirical Progress
 , pp. 377 - 396
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentals, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42(4), 529–555.Google Scholar
Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Guion, S. G., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2004). Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning: The case of Japanese /r/ and English /l/ and /r/. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 233–250.Google Scholar
Baese-Berk, M. M., Bradlow, A. R., & Wright, B. A. (2013). Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3), EL174–EL180.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.Google Scholar
Baumann, S., & Winter, B. (2018). What makes a word prominent? Predicting untrained German listeners’ perceptual judgments. Journal of Phonetics, 70, 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.2. 18) [Computer software]. Retrieved from www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–729.Google Scholar
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 41, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunellière, A., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2013). The speakers’ accent shapes the listeners’ phonological predictions during speech perception. Brain and Language, 125(1), 82–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dellwo, V. (2006). Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for∆ C. In Karnowski, P & Szigeti, I (Eds.), Language and language-processing (pp. 231–241). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floccia, C., Butler, J., Goslin, J., & Ellis, L. (2009). Regional and foreign accent processing in English: Can listeners adapt? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38(4), 379–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon-Salant, S., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Schurman, J. (2010). Short-term adaptation to accented English by younger and older adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(4), EL200–EL204. doi:10.1121/1.3486199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Liu, S. H., & Yeni-Komshian, G. H. (2000a). Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(2), 205–228.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., & Loftin, J. D. (2000b). The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 28(1), 27–42.Google Scholar
Idemaru, K., & Guion, S. G. (2008). Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 38(2), 167–186.Google Scholar
Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. L. (2011). Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1939–1956.Google ScholarPubMed
Idemaru, K., Wei, P., & Gubbins, L. (2019). Acoustic sources of accent in second language Japanese speech. Language and Speech, 62(2), 333–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, K. H., & Guion, S. G. (2008). Clear speech production of Korean stops: Changing phonetic targets and enhancement strategies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(6), 3909–3917.Google Scholar
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301–315.Google Scholar
Lenth, R. (2016). Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33. doi:10.18637/jss.v069.i01Google Scholar
Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2010). Why don’t we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 1093–1096.Google Scholar
McIntosh, R. D. (2017). Exploratory reports: A new article type for Cortex. Cortex, 96, A1–A4.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2011). The foundations of accent and intelligibility in pronunciation research. Language Teaching, 44(3), 316–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). A prospectus for pronunciation research in the 21st century: A point of view. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 1(1), 11–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, G. E., Guion-Anderson, S., Aoyama, K., Flege, J. E., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Yamada, T. (2011). A one-year longitudinal study of English and Japanese vowel production by Japanese adults and children in an English-speaking setting. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 156–167.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2000). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 75, AD3–AD30.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Roettger, T. B., Winter, B., & Baayen, H. (2019). Emergent data analysis in phonetic sciences: Towards pluralism and reproducibility. Journal of Phonetics, 73, 1–7.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. B., Carranza, M. A., & Moffie, R. W. (1977). Reactions toward varying degrees of accentedness in the speech of Spanish-English bilinguals. Language and Speech, 20(3), 267–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 217–240.Google Scholar
Sereno, J., Lammers, L., & Jongman, A. (2016). The relative contribution of segments and intonation to the perception of foreign-accented speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., Højsgaard, S., Fox, J., Lawrence, M. A., Mertens, U., & Love, J. (2016). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments (R package Version 0.16-1). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=afexGoogle Scholar
Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 323.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. R., & Kendall, T. (2015). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. Retrieved from http://lingtools.uoregon.edu/norm/norm1Google Scholar
Tomaschek, F., Hendrix, P., & Baayen, R. H. (2018). Strategies for addressing collinearity in multivariate linguistic data. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2012). Disentangling accent from comprehensibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 905–916.Google Scholar
United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Population Divisions. (2017). International Migration Report 2017: Highlights (Report No. ST/ESA/SER.A/404). New York: Author.Google Scholar
Urberg-Carlson, K., Munson, B., & Kaiser, E. (2009). Gradient measures of children’s speech production: Visual analog scale and equal appearing interval scale measures of fricative goodness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(4), 2529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Engen, K. J., & Peelle, J. E. (2014). Listening effort and accented speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 577.Google Scholar
Venditti, J. J. (2005). The J_ToBI model of Japanese intonation. In Jun, S.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 172–200). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayland, R. (1997). Non-native production of Thai: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Applied Linguistics, 18(3), 345–373.Google Scholar
White, L., & Mattys, S. L. (2007). Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35(4), 501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H. (2017). stringr: Simple, Consistent Wrappers for Common String Operations (R package Version 1.2.0). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stringrGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H., Hester, J., & Romain, F. (2017). readr: Read Rectangular Text Data (R package Version 1.1.1). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readrGoogle Scholar
Wickham, H., Romain Francois, L., Müller, K., & Müller, H. (2017). dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation (R package Version 0.7.2). Retrieved from https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=dplyrGoogle Scholar
Winters, S., & O’Brien, M. G. (2013). Perceived accentedness and intelligibility: The relative contributions of F0 and duration. Speech Communication, 55(3), 486–507.Google Scholar
Wright, M. N., & Ziegler, A. (2015). ranger: A fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.04409.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×