Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T08:17:27.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in the Philosophy of Biology

Adaptation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2021

Elisabeth Lloyd
Elisabeth Lloyd
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington

Summary

Natural selection causes adaptation, the fit between an organism and its environment. For example, the white and grey coloration of snowy owls living and breeding around the Arctic Circle provides camouflage from both predators and prey. In this Element, we explore a variety of such outcomes of the evolutionary process, including both adaptations and alternatives to adaptations, such as nonadaptive traits inherited from ancestors. We also explore how the concept of adaptation is used in evolutionary psychology and in animal behavior, and the adequacy of methods used to confirm evolutionary accounts of human traits and behaviors.
Get access

Keywords

evolutionary adaptationevolutionary causesdevelopment and evolutionevolutionary by-productsmethodological adaptationism
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in the Philosophy of Biology
Online ISBN: 9781108634953
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 27 May 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerly, D. D. 2004. “Adaptation, niche conservatism, and convergence: Comparative studies of leaf evolution in the California chaparral.” The American Naturalist 163(5): 654–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/383062CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
“Adaptive evolution | boundless biology.” n.d. Accessed November 28, 2018. https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-biology/chapter/adaptive-evolution/.Google Scholar
Airoldi, G., 2018. “More than fitness. A robustness-based proposal of a logical space to classify processes behind evolutionary phenomena.” Kairos. Journal of Philosophy & Science 20(1): 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, J. 1987. “Ardent adaptationism.” Natural History 96(4): 4.Google Scholar
Alcock, J. 1998. “Unpunctuated equilibrium in the natural history essays of Stephen Jay Gould.” Evolution and Human Behavior 19(5): 321–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00029–4.Google Scholar
Allen, C. 2002. “Real traits, real functions?” In Ariew, A., Cummins, R., and Perlman, M. (eds.) Functions: new essays in the philosophy of psychology and biology. New York: Oxford University Press. 373–89.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. 2013. “Sexual dysfunctions” in Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.dsm13Google Scholar
Amundson, R. 1994. “Two concepts of constraint: Adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology.” Philosophy of Science 61(4): 556–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/289822Google Scholar
Amundson, R.. 1998. “Typology reconsidered: Two doctrines on the history of evolutionary biology.” Biology and Philosophy 13(2): 153–77. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006599002775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amundson, R. 2001. “Adaptation and development: On the lack of common ground.” In Orzack, S., and Sober, E. (eds.). Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press, New York. 303–34.Google Scholar
Amundson, R. 2005. The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, P. W., Gangestad, S. W., and Matthews, D.. 2002a. “Adaptationism, exaptationism, and evolutionary behavioral science.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25(4): 534–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02530090Google Scholar
Andrews, P. W., Gangestad, S. W., and Matthews, D.. 2002b. “Adaptationism – how to carry out an exaptationist program.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25(4): 489–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aoki, K. 1984. “A population genetic model of the evolution of oblique cultural transmission.” Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B 60(8): 310–13Google Scholar
Aoki, K. 1986. “A stochastic model of gene-culture coevolution suggested by the ‘culture historical hypothesis’ for the evolution of adult lactose absorption in humans.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 83(9): 2929–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnold, S. J. 1994. “Is there a unifying concept of sexual selection that applies to both plants and animals?” The American Naturalist 144: S1–12. https://doi.org/10.1086/285650Google Scholar
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. 1993. “Human sperm competition: ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm.” Animal Behaviour 46(5): 887–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barash, D. 2005. “Let a thousand orgasms bloom [Book Review of The case of the female orgasm. E. A. Lloyd].” Evolutionary Psychology 3(1): 347–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490500300123Google Scholar
Barash, D. P., and Lipton, J. E.. 2009. How women got their curves and other just-so stories: evolutionary enigmas. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, M. S., Demuth, J. P., and Wade, M. J.. 2005. “Maternal expression relaxes constraint on innovation of the anterior determinant, bicoid.” PLoS Genetics 1(5): e57. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0010057Google Scholar
Beatty, J. 1987. “Natural selection and the null hypothesis.” In Dupre, J. (ed.) The latest on the best: essays on evolution and optimality. 53–75. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., and Richerson, P. J.. 2009. “Culture and the evolution of human cooperation.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 364(1533): 3281–88. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., and Wakefield, J. C.. 1998. “Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels.” American Psychologist 53(5): 533–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.5.533CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, S. B. 2005. Endless forms most beautiful: the new science of evo devo and the making of the animal kingdom. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L., and Feldman, M. W.. 1973. “Models for cultural inheritance. I. Group mean and within group variation.” Theoretical Population Biology 4(1): 42–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. W. 1981. Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Charnov, E. L., and Parker, G. A.. 1995. “Dimensionless invariants from foraging theory’s marginal value theorem.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92(5): 1446–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.5.1446Google Scholar
Cheng, H., and Muir, W. M.. 2005. “The effects of genetic selection for survivability and productivity on chicken physiological homeostasis.” World’s Poultry Science Journal 61(3): 383–97. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200464Google Scholar
Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. 1974. “Male-female, female-female, and male-male sexual behavior in the stumptail monkey, with special attention to the female orgasm.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 3(2). 95–116.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J.. 1994. “Better than rational: evolutionary psychology and the invisible hand.” The American Economic Review 84(2): 327–32.Google Scholar
“Cranial sutures and fontanels.” n.d. Mayo Clinic. Accessed December 5, 2018. www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/craniosynostosis/multimedia/cranial-sutures-and-fontanels/img-20006785Google Scholar
Cummins, R. 1975. “Functional analysis.” The Journal of Philosophy 72(20): 741–65. doi:10.2307/2024640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dawood, K., Kirk, K. M., Bailey, M. J., Andrews, P. W., and Martin, N. G.. 2005. “Genetic and environmental influences on the frequency of orgasm in women.” Twin Research and Human Genetics 8(1): 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.8.1.27.Google Scholar
Delph, L. F., and Ashman, T.. 2006. “Trait selection in flowering plants: How does sexual selection contribute?” Integrative and Comparative Biology 46(4): 465–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icj038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delph, L. F., and Herlihy, C. R.. 2012. “Sexual, fecundity, and viability selection on flower size and number in a sexually dimorphic plant.” Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution 66(4): 1154–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01510.xGoogle Scholar
Dewsbury, D. A. 1992. “Essay on contemporary issues in ethology: on the problems studied in ethology, comparative psychology, and animal behavior.” Ethology 92(2): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1992.tb00951.xGoogle Scholar
“Digital morphology at the University of Texas.” n.d. Accessed December 5, 2018. http://digimorph.org/index.phtmlGoogle Scholar
Dixson, A. 2009. Sexual selection and the origins of human mating systems. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixson, A. 2012. Primate sexuality. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, A. E., and Werren, J. H.. 2016. “Holes in the hologenome: Why host-microbe symbioses are not holobionts.” MBio. 7(2).10.1128/mBio.02099–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, K. M., Cherkas, L. F., and Spector, T. D.. 2005. “Genetic influences on variation in female orgasmic function: a twin study.” Biology Letters 1(3): 260–63. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El‐Sabaawi, R. W., Zandonà, E., Kohler, T. J., Marshall, M. C., Moslemi, J. M., Travis, J., López‐Sepulcre, A., Ferriere, R., Pringle, C. M., Thomas, S. A., and Reznick, D. N.. 2012. “Widespread intraspecific organismal stoichiometry among populations of the trinidadian guppy.” Functional Ecology 26(3): 666–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.01974.xGoogle Scholar
Endler, J. A. 1978. “A predator’s view of animal color patterns.” In Hecht, M. K., Steere, W. C., and Wallace, B. (eds.), Evolutionary Biology. Evolutionary Biology, vol II. Springer, Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6956-5_5Google Scholar
Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fairbanks, D. J., and Rytting, B.. 2001. “Mendelian controversies: a botanical and historical review.” American Journal of Botany 88(5): 737–52.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. W., and Laland, K. N.. 1996. “Gene-culture coevolutionary theory.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11(11): 453–57.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. W., and Cavalli-Sforza, L.. 1985. On the theory of evolution under genetic and cultural transmission with application to the lactose absorption problem. Stanford Institute for Population and Resource Studies.Google Scholar
Fisher, S. 1973. Understanding the female orgasm. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Fitelson, B., 2001. “A Bayesian account of independent evidence with applications.” Philosophy of Science 68(S3): S123–S140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, S. [1905] 1953. “Three essays on the theory of sexuality.” In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, volume VII (1901–1905): A case of hysteria, three essays on sexuality and other works. 123–246.Google Scholar
Freud, S. [1923] 1963. “Freud: introductory lectures on psychoanalysis.” The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud.Google Scholar
Futuyma, D. and Kirkpatrick, M.. 2017. Evolution (4th ed.). Sinauer Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Galis, F. 1999. “Why do almost all mammals have seven cervical vertebrae? Developmental constraints, hox genes, and cancer.” Journal of Experimental Zoology 285(1): 19–26.Google Scholar
Gannett, L. 2010. “Questions asked and unasked: how by worrying less about the ‘really real’ philosophers of science might better contribute to debates about genetics and race.” Synthese 177(3): 363–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9788-1Google Scholar
Geary, D. C., and Flinn, M. V.. 2001. “Evolution of human parental behavior and the human family.” Parenting 1(1–2): 5–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2001.9681209.Google Scholar
Glymour, C. 1980. Theory and evidence. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2001. “Three kinds of adaptationism.” In Orzack, S. and Sober, E. (eds.). Adaptationism and optimality. 344–62. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1987a. “Freudian slip.” Natural History 96(2): 14–21.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1987b. “Reply to Alcock.” Natural History 96(4): 4–6.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1991. “Exaptation: a crucial tool for an evolutionary psychology.” Journal of Social Issues 47(3): 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1991.tb01822.xGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. 2002. The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Vrba, E. S.. 1982. “Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form.” Paleobiology 8(1): 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300004310Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C.. 1979. “The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B Biological Science 205(1161): 581–98. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086Google Scholar
Griesemer, J. 2013. “Integration of approaches in David Wake’s model-taxon research platform for evolutionary morphology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44(4, Part A): 525–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.03.021Google Scholar
Griesemer, J. 2015. “What salamander biologists have taught us about evo-devo.” In Love, A. C. (ed.) Conceptual change in biology: Scientific and philosophical perspectives on evolution and development. 271–301. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9412-1_13.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. J. F., Wessler, R. C. Lewontin, W. M. Gelbart, D. T. Suzuki, and J. H. Miller, . 2005. An introduction to genetic analysis (8th ed.). Macmillan.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 1996. “The historical turn in the study of adaptation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47(4): 511–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/47.4.511Google Scholar
Harrison, D. F. N. 1980. “Biomechanics of the giraffe larynx and trachea.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 89 (3–6): 258–64. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016488009127136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, D. F. N. 1981. “Fibre size frequency in the recurrent laryngeal nerves of man and giraffe.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 91(1–6): 383–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016488109138519Google Scholar
Hite, S. 1976. The Hite report on female sexuality. Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Hosken, D. J. 2008. “Clitoral variation says nothing about female orgasm.” Evolution & Development 10(4): 393–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00247.xGoogle Scholar
Hrdy, S. B. 2005. “Cooperative breeders with an ace in the hole,” In Voland E., A. Chasiotis, and W. Schiefenhövel (eds.) Grandmotherhood: The evolutionary significance of the second half of female life. 295–317.Google Scholar
“Inkscape tutorial: tracing bitmaps | Inkscape.” n.d. Accessed November 29, 2018. https://inkscape.org/doc/tutorials/tracing/tutorial-tracing.htmlGoogle Scholar
Inside Nature’s Giants | PBS. n.d. Accessed November 29, 2018. www.pbs.org/show/inside-natures-giants/Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 2008. “Species selection: Theory and data.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39(1): 501–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, D., and Hunt, G.. 2006. “Larval ecology, geographic range, and species survivorship in Cretaceous mollusks: Organismic versus species‐level explanations.” The American Naturalist 168(4): 556–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/507994CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, F. 1977. Evolution and tinkering. Science 196(4295): 1161–66.Google Scholar
Kerr, B., and Godfrey-Smith, P.. 2002. “Individualist and multi-level perspectives on selection in structured populations.” Biology and Philosophy 17(4): 477–517.Google Scholar
Ketterson, E. D., and Nolan, V. Jr. 1999. “Adaptation, exaptation, and constraint: A hormonal perspective.” The American Naturalist 154 (S1): S4–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/303280.Google Scholar
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., and Gebhard, P. H.. 1953. Sexual behavior in the human female. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Komisaruk, B., Beyer-Flores, C., and Whipple, B.. 2006. The science of orgasm. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Komisaruk, B. R., Wise, N., Frangos, E., Liu, W., Allen, K., and Brody, S.. 2011. “Women’s clitoris, vagina, and cervix mapped on the sensory cortex: FMRI evidence.” The Journal of Sexual Medicine 8(10): 2822–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02388.xGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., and Feldman, M. W.. 2000. “Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(1): 131–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00002417.Google Scholar
Lemmon, W. B., and Allen, M. L.. 1978. “Continual sexual receptivity in the female chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).” Folia Primatologica 30, no. 1: 80–88.Google Scholar
Levin, R. J. 2011. “Can the controversy about the putative role of the human female orgasm in sperm transport be settled with our current physiological knowledge of coitus?” The Journal of Sexual Medicine 8(6): 1566–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02162.x.Google Scholar
Levin, R. J. 2014. “Should the clitoris become a vestigial organ by personal psychological clitoridectomy? A critical examination of the literature.” Journal of Womens Health, Issues and Care. https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9795.1000159Google Scholar
Levin, R. J. 2015. “Recreation and procreation: A critical view of sex in the human female.” Clinical Anatomy 28(3): 339–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22495.Google Scholar
Levins, R. 1966. “The strategy of model building in population biology.” American Scientist 54(4): 421–31.Google Scholar
Lewens, T. 2009. “Seven types of adaptationism.” Biology & Philosophy 24 (2): 161–82 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-008-9145-7.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1978. “Adaptation.” Scientific American 239(3): 213–31.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1983. “Gene, Organism and Environment.” In Bendal, D. S. (ed.) Evolution from molecules to men. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C., and Dunn, L. C.. 1960. “The evolutionary dynamics of a polymorphism in the house mouse.” Genetics 45(6): 705–22.Google Scholar
Li, D., and O’Loughlin, R.. Manuscript. “Tractability assumptions, holism, and model robustness.” Submitted.Google Scholar
Linde-Medina, M. 2011. “Adaptation or exaptation? The case of the human hand.” Journal of Biosciences 36(4): 575–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-011-9102-5Google Scholar
Linquist, S. P. 2006. “Sometimes an orgasm is just an orgasm.” Metascience 15(2): 411–19.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. 1983. “The nature of Darwin’s support for the theory of natural selection.” Philosophy of Science 50 (1): 112–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/289093Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. 1988/1994. The structure and confirmation of evolutionary theory. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. 2001. “Units and levels of selection: An anatomy of the units of selection debates.” In Rama, S., Krimbas, C. B., Beatty, J., and Paul, D. B. (eds.). Thinking about evolution: Historical, philosophical, and political perspectives (2): 267–91. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. 2005a. The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. 2005b. “Why the gene will not return.” Philosophy of Science 72(2). 287–310.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. 2013. “Stephen J. Gould and adaptation: San Marco 33 years later.” In Stephen J. Gould: The Scientific Legacy. Springer, Milano. 21–35Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. 2015a. “Adaptationism and the logic of research questions: How to think clearly about evolutionary causes.” Biological Theory 10(4): 343–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-015-0214-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. 2015b. “Model robustness as a confirmatory virtue: The case of climate science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49: 58–68.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. 2017. “Units and levels of selection,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/selection-units/Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A., and Gould, S. J.. 1993. “Species selection on variability.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 90(2): 595–99. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.2.595Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A., and Gould, S. J.. 2017. “Exaptation revisited: Changes imposed by evolutionary psychologists and behavioral biologists.” Biological Theory 12(1): 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-016-0258-yGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, E. A., Lewontin, R. C., and Feldman, M. W.. 2008. “The generational cycle of state spaces and adequate genetical representation.” Philosophy of Science 75(2), 140–56.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A., and Wade, M. J.. 2019. “Criteria for holobionts from community genetics.” Biological Theory 14(3): 151–70. 10.1007/s13752-019–00322-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, E. A., Wilson, D. S., and Sober, E.. 2011. “Evolutionary mismatch and what to do about it.” The Evolution Institute (blog). November 13, 2012. https://evolution-institute.org/evolutionary-mismatch-and-what-to-do-about-it/Google Scholar
Losos, J. B. 2011. “Seeing the forest for the trees: The limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology.” The American Naturalist 177(6): 709–27. https://doi.org/10.1086/660020Google Scholar
Love, A. C. 2003. “Evolutionary morphology, innovation, and the synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology.” Biology and Philosophy 18(2): 309–45.Google Scholar
Love, A. C. 2006. “Evolutionary morphology and evo-devo: Hierarchy and novelty.” Theory in Biosciences 124(3): 317–33. Google Scholar
Marshall Cavendish Corporation. 2010. Mammal anatomy: An illustrated guide. Illustrated edition. New York: Cavendish Square.Google Scholar
Martins, E. P. 2000. “Adaptation and the Comparative Method.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15(7): 296–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01880-2.Google Scholar
Masters, W. H. and Johnson, V. E.. 1965. “The sexual response of the human female.” In Money, J. (ed.). Sex Research: New Developments. 53–112. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Masters, W. H. and Johnson, V. E.. 1966. The human sexual response. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1978. “Models in ecology.” CUP Archive.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1993. The theory of evolution. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1983. “How to carry out the adaptationist program?” The American Naturalist 121(3): 324–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/284064Google Scholar
Medeyko, V. 1986. The Collins Encyclopedia of Animal Evolution. Berry, R. J. and Hallam, A. (eds.). London: Collins.Google Scholar
Millstein, R. L. 2008. “Distinguishing drift and selection empirically: ‘The great snail debate’ of the 1950s.” Journal of the History of Biology 41(2): 339–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-007-9145-5.Google Scholar
Muller, G. B., & Wagner, G. P. 1991. “Novelty in evolution: restructuring the concept.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22(1): 229–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, C. G. 1998. “Interaction-independent sexual election and the mechanisms of sexual selection.” Evolution 52 (1): 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb05133.xGoogle Scholar
Newman, S. A. 1988. “Lineage and pattern in the developing vertebrate limb.” Trends in Genetics 4 (12): 329–32.Google Scholar
Newman, S. A., and Bhat, R.. 2008. “Dynamical patterning modules: Physico-genetic determinants of morphological development and evolution.” Physical Biology 5 (1): 015008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/5/1/015008Google Scholar
Newman, S. A., and Bhat, R.. 2011. “Lamarck’s dangerous idea.” In Jablonka, E. and Gissis, S. B. (eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: From subtle fluids to molecular biology. 157–70. Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Nijhout, F. H. 1991. The development and evolution of butterfly wing patterns. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. H., Vaccaro, C. M., Crisp, C. C., Estanol, M. V., Fellner, A. N., Kleeman, S. D., and Pauls, R. N.. 2014. “Clitoral size and location in relation to sexual function using pelvic MRI.” The Journal of Sexual Medicine 11(4): 1013–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12450.Google Scholar
Odenbaugh, J. 2018. “Emotions.” Ch. 4 Manuscript.Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., and Feldman, M. W.. 2003. Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Orzack, S. H., and Sober, E.. 2001. Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pavličev, M., Zupan, A. M., Barry, A., Walters, S., Milano, K. M., Kliman, H. J., and Wagner, G. P.. 2019. “An experimental test of the ovulatory homolog model of female orgasm.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(41). 20267–73.Google Scholar
Pavličev, M., and Wagner, G. P.. 2016. “The evolutionary origin of female orgasm.” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 326(6): 326–37.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 1999. “How the mind works.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 882: 119–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puts, D. A., Dawood, K., and Welling, L. L. M.. 2012a. “Why women have orgasms: An evolutionary analysis.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 41 (5): 1127–43.Google Scholar
Puts, D. A., Welling, L. M., Burriss, R. P., and Dawood, K.. 2012b. “Men’s masculinity and attractiveness predict their female partners’ reported orgasm frequency and timing.” Evolution and Human Behavior 33(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.03.003.Google Scholar
Raff, R. A. 1996. The shape of life: Genes, development and the evolution of animal form. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Raff, R. A., and Raff, E. C.. 2009. “Evolution in the light of embryos: Seeking the origins of novelties in ontogeny.” In Laubichler, M. D. and Maienschein, J. (eds.) Form and function in developmental evolutions. 83–111. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, H. K., and Sherman, P. W.. 1993. “Adaptation and the goals of evolutionary research.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 68(1): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1086/417909Google Scholar
Reznick, D., and Travis, J. 1996. “The empirical study of adaptation in natural populations.” In Rose, M. R., and Lauder, G. V. (eds.), Adaptation. 243–89, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rose, M. R., and Lauder, V.. 1996. Adaptation. Academic Press. https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/47/3/538/1703769.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1919. Introduction to mathematical philosophy. McMillan.Google Scholar
Sagan[Margulis], L. 1967. “On the origin of mitosing cells.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 14 (3): 225-IN6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(67)90079-3Google Scholar
Sansom, R. 2003. “Constraining the adaptationism debate.” Biology and Philosophy 18 (4): 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025581622161Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., and Pilcher, J. J.. 2004. “Evaluating evidence of psychological adaptation: How do we know one when we see one?” Psychological Science 15(10): 643–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00734.xGoogle Scholar
Seger, J, and Stubblefield, J. W.. 1996. “Optimization and adaptation.” In Rose, M. R., and Lauder, G. V. (eds.) Adaptation. 93–102. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, P. W. 1989. “The clitoris debate and the levels of analysis.” Animal Behaviour 37(4): 697–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(89)90052-3.Google Scholar
Shpak, M., and Wagner, G. P.. 2000. “Asymmetry of configuration space induced by unequal crossover: implications for a mathematical theory of evolutionary innovation.” Artificial Life 6(1): 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1162/106454600568302.Google Scholar
Sinervo, Barry, and Basolo, A. L.. 1996. “Testing adaptation using phenotypic manipulations.” In Rose, M. R., and Lauder, G. V. (eds.) Adaptation. 149–185.Google Scholar
Smith, D. 2005. “A critic takes on the logic of female orgasm.” The New York Times, May 17, 2005, sec. Science Times. www.nytimes.com/2005/05/17/science/a-critic-takes-on-the-logic-of-female-orgasm.html.Google Scholar
Smith, M. J. 1978. “Optimization theory in evolution.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 9:31–56.Google Scholar
Song, N., Lin, A, and Zhao, X.. 2018. “Insight into higher-level phylogeny of Neuropterida: Evidence from secondary structures of mitochondrial rRNA genes and mitogenomic data.” PLOS ONE 13 (1): e0191826. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191826. ISSN 1932–6203.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K., and Kitcher, P.. 1988. “The return of the gene.” The Journal of Philosophy. 85(7): 339–361.Google Scholar
Suárez, J., and Triviño, V.. 2020. “What is a hologenomic adaptation? Emergent individuality and inter-identity in multispecies systems.” Frontiers in Psychology. 11.Google Scholar
Sunquist, F. 2006. “Malaysian mystery leopards.” National Wildlife. www.nwf.org/en/Magazines/National-Wildlife/2007/Malasian-Mystery.Google Scholar
Symons, D. 1979. The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Symons, D. 1990. “Adaptiveness and adaptation.” Ethology and Sociobiology 11(4): 427–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(90)90019-3.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R. 1990. “The study of adaptation.” In Bekoff, M., and Jamieson, D. (eds.) Readings in Animal Cognition. 31–62. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., and Cosmides, L.. 1997. “Letter to the editor of the New York Review of Books on Stephen Jay Gould’s ‘Darwinian fundamentalism.’” New York Review of Books, June 26, 1997. http://cogweb.ucla.edu/Debate/CEP_Gould.html.Google Scholar
Vaccaro, C. M. 2015. “The use of magnetic resonance imaging for studying female sexual function: A review.” Clinical Anatomy 28 (3): 324–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22531Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, B. C. 1977. “The pragmatics of explanation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (2): 143–50.Google Scholar
Wade, M. J. 1978. “A critical review of the models of group selection.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 53 (2): 101–14. https://doi.org/10.1086/410450Google Scholar
Wade, M. J. 2016. Adaptation in metapopulations: How interaction changes evolution. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, G. P. 2015. “Evolutionary innovations and novelties: Let us get down to business!” Zoologischer Anzeiger-A Journal of Comparative Zoology 256: 75–81.Google Scholar
Wagner, G. P. 2000. “What is the promise of developmental evolution? Part i: Why is developmental biology necessary to explain evolutionary innovations?” Journal of Experimental Zoology 288 (2): 95–98.Google Scholar
Wake, D. B. 1991. “Homoplasy: The result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitations?” The American Naturalist 138 (3): 543–67. https://doi.org/10.1086/285234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wake, D. B. 2009. “What salamanders have taught us about evolution.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40 (1): 333–52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173552Google Scholar
Wallen, K., and Lloyd, E. A.. 2011. “Female sexual arousal: Genital anatomy and orgasm in intercourse.” Hormones and Behavior, Special Issue on Research on Sexual Arousal 59(5): 780–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.12.004.Google Scholar
Wallen, K., Lloyd, E. A., and Myers, P. Z.. 2012. “Zietsch & Santtila’s study is not evidence against the by-product theory of female orgasm.” Animal Behaviour 84(5): e1–e4.Google Scholar
Weisberg, M. 2006. “Robustness analysis.” Philosophy of Science 73(5): 730–42.Google Scholar
Wheatley, J. R., and Puts, D. A.. 2015. “Evolutionary science of female orgasm.” In Shackelford, T. K., and Hansen, R. D. (eds.) The evolution of sexuality. Springer International Publishing. 123–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09384-0_7Google Scholar
Wikelski, M., Carrillo, V., and Trillmich, F.. 1997. “Energy limits to body size in a grazing reptile, the Galapagos marine iguana.” Ecology 78 (7): 2204–17.Google Scholar
Wikelski, M., and Thom, C.. 2000. “Marine iguanas shrink to survive El Niño.” Nature 403 (6765): 37–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/47396Google Scholar
Wikimedia Commons contributors. 2018. “File:GiraffaRecurrRu.Svg.” https://Commons.Wikimedia.Org. November 29, 2018. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:GiraffaRecurrRu.svg&oldid=278005938Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. 2006. “Some varieties of robustness.” Journal of Economic Methodology 13(2): 219–40.Google Scholar
Wright, L. 1973. “Functions.” The Philosophical Review 82(2): 139–68. doi:10.2307/2183766Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1931. “Evolution in Mendelian populations.” Genetics 16 (2): 97–159.Google Scholar
Zietsch, B. P., and Santtila, P.. 2011. “Genetic analysis of orgasmic function in twins and siblings does not support the by-product theory of female orgasm.” Animal Behaviour 82 (5): 1097–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.08.002Google Scholar
Zietsch, B. P., and Santtila, P.. 2013. “No direct relationship between human female orgasm rate and number of offspring.” Animal Behaviour 86 (2): 253–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.011Google Scholar
Zuk, M. 2006. “The case of the female orgasm (review).” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 49 (2): 294–98.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Adaptation
  • Elisabeth Lloyd, Indiana University, Bloomington
  • Online ISBN: 9781108634953
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Adaptation
  • Elisabeth Lloyd, Indiana University, Bloomington
  • Online ISBN: 9781108634953
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Adaptation
  • Elisabeth Lloyd, Indiana University, Bloomington
  • Online ISBN: 9781108634953
Available formats
×