Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:40:26.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Historical Theory and Practice

The Fabric of Historical Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2023

Zoltán Boldizsár Simon  and
Marek Tamm
Zoltán Boldizsár Simon
Affiliation:
Universität Bielefeld, Germany
Marek Tamm
Affiliation:
Tallinn University, Estonia

Summary

Historical time is a notoriously elusive notion. Yet, as societies attempt to make sense of rapidly changing worlds, it gains a new significance in the twenty-first century. This Element sketches a theory of historical time as based on a distinction between temporality and historicity. It approaches the fabric of historical time as varying relational arrangements and interactions of multiple temporalities and historicities. In the fabric, kinds of temporalities and historicities emerge, come to being, fade out, transform, cease to exist, merge, coexist, overlap, arrange and rearrange in constellations, and clash and conflict in a dynamic without a predetermined plot. The Element pays special attention to the more-than-human temporalities of the Anthropocene, the technology-fueled historicities of runaway changes, and the conflicts in the fabric of historical time at the intersections of technological, ecological, and social change.
Get access

Keywords

historical timemultiple historicitiesmultiple temporalitiessynchronizationtime conflicts
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Historical Theory and Practice
Online ISBN: 9781009103947
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 07 September 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agarwal, Anil, and Narain, Sunita (1991). Global Warming in an Unequal World: A Case of Environmental Colonialism. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis, and Balibar, Étienne (1970). Reading “Capital”. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, Frank (2006). “Presence” and Myth. History and Theory 45(3): 328–336.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, Frank (2021). The Thorn of History: Unintended Consequences and Speculative Philosophy of History. History and Theory 60(2): 187–214.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1961). The Concept of History: Ancient and Modern. In Hannah Arendt, Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking Press, 41–90.Google Scholar
Assmann, Aleida (2020). Is Time Out of Joint? On the Rise and Fall of the Modern Time Regime. Trans. Sarah Clift. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Assmann, Jan (1997). Moses the Egyptian: The Memory of Egypt in Western Monotheism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azhar, Azeem (2021). Exponential: How Accelerating Technology Is Leaving Us behind and What to Do about It. London: Random House Business.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Prathama (2006). Politics of Time: “Primitives” and History-Writing in a Colonial Society. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bantigny, Ludivine (2013). Historicités du 20e siècle: Quelques jalons sur une notion. Vingtième Siècle: Revue d’histoire 117: 13–25.Google Scholar
Barak, On (2013). On Time: Technology and Temporality in Modern Egypt. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barkan, Elazar (2009). Introduction: Historians and Historical Reconciliation. American Historical Review 114(4): 899–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baschet, Jérôme (2018). Défaire la tyrannie du présent: Temporalités émergentes et futurs inédits. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Baschet, Jérôme (2021). Basculements: Mondes émergents, possibles désirables. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Baschet, Jérôme (2022). Reopening the Future: Emerging Worlds and Novel Historical Futures. History and Theory 61(2): 183–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashir, Shahzad (2022). A New Vision for Islamic Pasts and Futures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://islamic-pasts-futures.org.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Ruha (2019). Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Berger, Stefan (2022). History and Identity: How Historical Theory Shapes Historical Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bergwik, Staffan, and Ekström, Anders (2022). Introduction: Dividing Times. In Ekström, Anders and Bergwik, Staffan, eds., Times of History, Times of Nature: Temporalization and the Limits of Modern Knowledge. New York: Berghahn, 1–16.Google Scholar
Bevernage, Berber (2008). Time, Presence, and Historical Injustice. History and Theory 47(2): 149–167.Google Scholar
Bevernage, Berber (2011). History, Memory, and State-Sponsored Violence: Time and Justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bevernage, Berber (2016). Tales of Pastness and Contemporaneity: On the Politics of Time in History and Anthropology. Rethinking History 20(3): 352–374.Google Scholar
Bevernage, Berber, and Lorenz, Chris (2013). Breaking Up Time: Negotiating the Borders between Present, Past, and Future. Storia della Storiografia 63: 31–50.Google Scholar
Bloch, Ernst (1985). Erbschaft dieser Zeit. Werkausgabe, vol. 4. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bodei, Remo (1979). Multiversum: Tempo e storia in Ernst Bloch. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Bonaldo, Rodrigo, and Carolina Barbosa Pereira, Ana (2023). Potential History: Reading Artificial Intelligence from Indigenous Knowledges. History and Theory 62(1): 3–29.Google Scholar
Bonneuil, Christophe (2020). Der Historiker und der Planet: Planetaritätsregimes an der Schnittstelle von Welt-Ökologien, ökologischen Reflexivitäten und Geo-Mächten. In Adloff, Frank and Neckel, Sighard, eds., Gesellschaftstheorie im Anthropozän. Frankfurt: Campus, 55–92.Google Scholar
Bos, Jacques (2021). Presence. In van den Akker, Chiel, ed., The Routledge Companion to Historical Theory. London: Routledge, 573–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouton, Christophe (2018). Dealing with Deep Time: The Issue of Ancestrality from Kant to Hegel. Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics 69–70: 38–51.Google Scholar
Bouton, Christophe (2022). L’Accélération de l’histoire: Des Lumières à l’Anthropocène. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi (2019). The Posthuman Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand (1958). Histoire et sciences sociales: La longue durée. Annales: Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 13(4): 725–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, Tamara L. (2018). Archaeology, Temporal Complexity, and the Politics of Time. In Swenson, Edward and Roddick, Andrew, eds., Constructions of Time and History in the Pre-Columbian Andes. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 263–278.Google Scholar
Browne, Victoria (2014). Feminism, Time, and Nonlinear History: A Polytemporal Approach. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter (2011). Exemplarity and Anti-exemplarity in Early Modern Europe. In Lianeri, Alexandra, ed., The Western Time of Ancient History: Historiographical Encounters with the Greek and Roman Pasts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 48–59.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2021). The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Connell, Raewyn (2018). Decolonizing Sociology. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 47(4): 399–407.Google Scholar
Conrad, Sebastian (2018). “Nothing Is the Way It Should Be”: Global Transformations of the Time Regime in the Nineteenth Century. Modern Intellectual History 15(3), 821–848.Google Scholar
Coole, Diana, and Frost, Samantha, ed. (2010). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Anwen, Garrow, Duncan, Gibson, Catriona, Giles, Melanie, and Wilkin, Neil (2022). Grave Goods: Objects and Death in Later Prehistoric Britain. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Kate, Crawford (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Crist, Eileen, and Kopnina, Helen (2014). Unsettling Anthropocentrism. Dialectical Anthropology 38(4): 387–396.Google Scholar
Davis, Heather, and Todd, Zoe (2017). On the Importance of a Date, or Decolonizing the Anthropocene. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 16(4): 761–780.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathleen (2008). Periodization and Sovereignty: How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
De Baets, Antoon (2011). Historical Imprescriptibility. Storia della Storiografia 59–60: 128–149.Google Scholar
Décultot, Elizabeth, and Fulda, Daniel, eds. (2016). Sattelzeit: Historiogra-phiegeschichtliche Revisionen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (2006). Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deutsch, David (1998). The Fabric of Reality: The Science of Parallel Universes – and Its Implications. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Devun, Leah, and Tortorici, Zeb (2018). Trans, Time, and History. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly 5(4): 518–539.Google Scholar
Didi-Huberman, Georges (2002). L’image survivante: Histoire de l’art et temps des fantômes selon Aby Warburg. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Dodd, Nigel, and Wajcman, Judy (2017). Simmel and Benjamin: Early Theorists of the Acceleration Society. In Wajcman, Judy and Dodd, Nigel, eds., The Sociology of Speed: Digital, Organizational, and Social Temporalities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13–24.Google Scholar
Domanska, Ewa (2010). Beyond Anthropocentrism in Historical Studies. Historein 10: 118–130.Google Scholar
Dube, Saurabh, and Banerjee-Dube, Ishita, eds. (2006). Unbecoming Modern: Colonialism, Modernity, Colonial Modernities. New Delhi: Social Science Press.Google Scholar
Dürbeck, Gabriele, and Hüpkes, Philip, eds. (2022). Narratives of Scale in the Anthropocene: Imagining Human Responsibility in an Age of Scalar Complexity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edelstein, Dan, Geroulanos, Stefanos, and Wheatley, Natasha, eds. (2020a). Power and Time: Temporalities in Conflict and the Making of History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Edelstein, Dan, Geroulanos, Stefanos, and Wheatley, Natasha (2020b). Chronocenosis: An Introduction to Power and Time. In Edelstein, Dan, Geroulanos, Stefanos, and Wheatley, Natasha, eds., Power and Time: Temporalities in Conflict and the Making of History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1–49.Google Scholar
Ekström, Anders, and Bergwik, Staffan, eds. (2022). Times of History, Times of Nature: Temporalization and the Limits of Modern Knowledge. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Esposito, Fernando, ed. (2017). Zeitenwandel: Transformationen geschichtlicher Zeitlichkeit nach dem Boom. Gottingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Fareld, Victoria (2018). History, Justice and the Time of the Imprescriptible. In Helgesson, Stefan and Svenungsson, Jayne, eds., The Ethos of History: Time and Responsibility. New York: Berghahn, 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fareld, Victoria (2019). Coming to Terms with the Present: Exploring the Chrononormativity of Historical Time. In Tamm, Marek and Olivier, Laurent, eds., Rethinking Historical Time: New Approaches to Presentism. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 57–70.Google Scholar
Fareld, Vitoria (2022a) Time. In van den Akker, Chiel, ed., The Routledge Companion to Historical Theory. London: Routledge, 558–572.Google Scholar
Fareld, Victora (2022b). Framing the Polychronic Present. In Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár and Deile, Lars, eds., Historical Understanding: Past, Present, and Future. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 25–33.Google Scholar
Fernández-Sebastian, Javier (2016). A World in the Making: Discovering the Future in the Hispanic World. Contributions to the History of Concepts 11(2): 110–132.Google Scholar
Ferrando, Francesca (2019). Philosophical Posthumanism. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Friedman, Susan Stanford (2019). Alternatives to Periodization: Literary History, Modernism, and the “New” Temporalities. Modern Language Quarterly 80(4): 379–402.Google Scholar
Frieman, Catherine J. (2023). Archaeology As History: Telling Stories from a Fragmented Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fryxell, Allegra F. P. (2019). Time and the Modern: Current Trends in the History of Modern Temporalities. Past and Present 243: 285–298.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Anne (2019). Precarious Times: Temporality and History in Modern German Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Anne (2022). Chronic Crisis Novels and the Quest for “the Good-Enough Life”: Kathrin Röggla’s Die Alarmbereiten, Kristine Bilkau’s Die Glücklichen, and Thorsten Nagelschmidt’s Arbeit. Seminar: A Journal of Germanic Studies 58(3): 328–348.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Iason (2020). Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment. Minds and Machines 30: 411–437.Google Scholar
González-Ruibal, Alfredo (2006). The Past Is Tomorrow: Towards an Archaeology of the Vanishing Present. Norwegian Archaeological Review 39(2): 110–125.Google Scholar
González-Ruibal, Alfredo (2016). Archaeology and the Time of Modernity. Historical Archaeology 50(3): 144–164.Google Scholar
Ghosh, Amitav (2021). The Nutmeg’s Curse: Parables for a Planet in Crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, Ranjan, and Kleinberg, Ethan, eds. (2013). Presence: Philosophy, History, and Cultural Theory for the Twenty-First Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay (1987). Time’s Arrow, Time’s Cycle: Myth and Metaphor in the Discovery of Geological Time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grave, Johannes (2019). Pictorial Temporality and the Times of History: On Seeing Images and Experiencing Time. In Tamm, Marek and Olivier, Laurent, eds., Rethinking Historical Time: New Approaches to Presentism. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 117–130.Google Scholar
Gray, Mary L., and Suri, Siddharth (2019). Ghost Work: How to Stop Silicon Valley from Building a New Global Underclass. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Greene, Brian (2004). The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Grinspoon, David (2016). Earth in Human Hands: Shaping Our Planet’s Future. New York: Grand Central.Google Scholar
Grosfoguel, Ramón (2000). Developmentalism, Modernity, and Dependency Theory in Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South 1(2): 347–374.Google Scholar
Guha, Ranajit (2002). History at the Limit of World-History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich (2004). Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich (2014). Our Broad Present: Time and Contemporary Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gurvitch, Georges (1958). La multiplicité des temps sociaux. Paris: Centre de documentation universitaire.Google Scholar
Gurvitch, Georges (1964). The Spectrum of Social Time. Trans. Myrtle Korenbaum. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, Maurice (1950). La mémoire collective. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hamann, Byron Ellsworth (2016). How to Chronologize with a Hammer, Or, The Myth of Homogeneous, Empty Time. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(1): 261–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Harmanşah, Ömür (2020). Deep Time and Landscape History: How Can Historical Particularity Be Translated? In Wiggin, Bethany, Fornoff, Carolyn, and Kim, Patricia Eunji, eds., Timescales: Thinking across Ecological Temporalities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 39–53.Google Scholar
Harootunian, Harry (2015). Marx after Marx: History and Time in the Expansion of Capitalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Olivia (2004). Braudel: Historical Time and the Horror of Discontinuity. History Workshop Journal 57(1): 161–174.Google Scholar
Hartog, François (2015). Regimes of Historicity: Presentism and Experiences of Time. Trans. Saskia Brown. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, François (2022). Chronos: The West Confronts Time. Trans. Sam Gilbert. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, Robert (2009). Empires of Speed: Time and the Acceleration of Politics and Society. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Helgesson, Stefan (2014). Radicalizing Temporal Difference: Anthropology, Postcolonial Theory, and Literary Time. History and Theory 53(4): 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellerma, Juhan (2020). Koselleck on Modernity, Historik, and Layers of Time. History and Theory 59(2): 188–209.Google Scholar
Hellerma, Juhan (2021). History on the Move: Reimagining Historical Change and the (Im)Possibility of Utopia in the 21st Century. Journal of the Philosophy of History 15(2): 249–262.Google Scholar
Henry, Charles P. (2003). The Politics of Racial Reparations. Journal of Black Studies 34(2): 131–152.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried (1998). “Eine Metakritik zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft,” in Schriften zur Literatur und Philosophie 1792–1800. Berlin: Deutscher Klassiker.Google Scholar
Hesketh, Ian (2023). A History of Big History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Eric, and Stewart, Charles (2005). Introduction: Ethnographies of Historicity. History and Anthropology 16(3): 261–274.Google Scholar
Hochkirchen, Britta (2021). Beyond Representation: Pictorial Temporality and the Relational Time of the Event. History and Theory 60(1): 102–116.Google Scholar
Hölscher, Lucian (2016). Die Entdeckung der Zukunft. Gottingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Hölscher, Lucian (2020). Zeitgärten. Zeitfiguren in der Geschichte der Neuzeit. Gottingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Hong, Sun-ha (2022). Predictions without Futures. History and Theory 61(3): 371–390.Google Scholar
Horn, Eva, and Bergthaller, Hannes (2019). The Anthropocene: Key Issues for the Humanities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian (1968 [1957]). Transhumanism. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 8(1): 73–76.Google Scholar
Iheka, Cajetan (2021). African Ecomedia: Network Forms, Planetary Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Inoue, Cristina Aoki, Yumie (2018). Worlding the Study of Global Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene: Indigenous Voices from the Amazon. Global Environmental Politics 18(4): 25–42.Google Scholar
Irvine, Richard D. G. (2020). An Anthropology of Deep Time: Geological Temporality and Social Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jordheim, Helge (2014). Introduction: Multiple Times and the Work of Synchronization. History and Theory 53(4): 498–518.Google Scholar
Jordheim, Helge (2022a). In Sync/Out of Sync. In Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár and Deile, Lars, eds., Historical Understanding: Past, Present, and Future. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 45–56.Google Scholar
Jordheim, Helge (2022b). Mending Shattered Time: 22 July in Norwegian Collective Memory. In Bangstad, Torgeir Rinke and Pétursdóttir, Þóra, eds., Heritage Ecologies. London: Routledge, 185–207.Google Scholar
Jordheim, Helge (2022c). Natural Histories for the Anthropocene: Koselleck’s Theories and the Possibility of a History of Lifetimes. History and Theory 61(3): 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordheim, Helge, and Wigen, Einar (2018). Conceptual Synchronisation: From Progress to Crisis. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 46(3): 421–439.Google Scholar
Jordheim, Helge, and Ytreberg, Espen (2021). After Supersynchronisation: How Media Synchronise the Social. Time & Society 30(3): 402–422.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Dolly (2022). Extinction and the End of Futures. History and Theory 61(2): 209–218.Google Scholar
Jung, Theo (2010/11). Das Neue der Neuzeit ist ihre Zeit: Reinhart Kosellecks Theorie der Verzeitlichung und ihre Kritiker. Moderne: Kulturwissenschaf-tliches Jahrbuch 6: 172–184.Google Scholar
Karlholm, Dan (2018). Is History to Be Closed, Saved, or Restarted? Considering Efficient Art History. In Karlholm, Dan and Moxey, Keith, eds., Time in the History of Art: Temporality, Chronology, and Anachrony. London: Routledge, 13–25.Google Scholar
Kashwan, Prakash, Biermann, Frank, Gupta, Aarti, and Okereke, Chukwumerije (2020). Planetary Justice: Prioritizing the Poor in Earth System Governance. Earth System Governance 6: 100075.Google Scholar
Kleinberg, Ethan (2013). Prologue. In Ghosh, Ranjan and Kleinberg, Ethan, eds., Presence: Philosophy, History, and Cultural Theory for the Twenty-First Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1–7.Google Scholar
Kleinberg, Ethan (2017). Haunting History: For a Deconstructive Approach to the Past. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart (1967). Preussen zwischen Reform und Revolution. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart (2000). Zeitschichten: Studien zur Historik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart (2004). Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Trans. Keith Tribe. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart (2018). Sediments of Time. On Possible Histories. Trans. and ed. Franzel, Sean and Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, Ray (2004). The Law of Accelerating Returns. In Teuscher, Christof, ed., Alan Turing: Life and Legacy of a Great Thinker. Berlin: Springer, 381–416.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, Ray (2005). The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Kverndokk, Kyrre, Bjærke, Marit Ruge, and Eriksen, Anne, eds. (2021). Climate Change Temporalities: Explorations in Vernacular, Popular, and Scientific Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kyung-Sup, Chang (2022). The Logic of Compressed Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Laki, László (2021). A “Színlelt” Szocializmusból, A “színlelt” Kapitalizmusba. Edited by Békés, Zoltán. Szeged: Belvedere Meridionale.Google Scholar
Landwehr, Achim, ed. (2012). Frühe Neuen Zeiten: Zeitwissen zwischen Reformation und Revolution. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
Landwehr, Achim (2016). Die anwesende Abwesenheit der Vergangenheit. Essay zur Geschichtstheorie. Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar
Landwehr, Achim (2018). Nostalgia and the Turbulence of Times. History and Theory 57(2): 251–268.Google Scholar
Landwehr, Achim (2020). Diesseits der Geschichte: Für eine andere Historiographie. Gottingen: Wallstein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenton, Timothy M., Held, Hermann, Kriegler, Elmar et al. (2008). Tipping Elements in the Earth’s Climate System. PNAS 105(6): 1786–1793.Google Scholar
Lenton, Timothy M., Rockström, Johan, Gaffnex, Owen et al. (2019). Climate Tipping Points – Too Risky to Bet Against. Nature 575: 592–595.Google Scholar
Lianeri, Alexandra, ed. (2011). The Western Time of Ancient History: Historiographical Encounters with the Greek and Roman Pasts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Livingston, Julie (2019). Self-Devouring Growth: A Planetary Parable As Told from South Africa. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Locher, Fabien, and Fressoz, Jean-Baptiste (2012). Modernity’s Frail Climate: A Climate History of Environmental Reflexivity. Critical Inquiry 38(3): 579–598.Google Scholar
Lochery, Emma (2022). Situating Extraction in Capitalism: Blueprints, Frontier Projects, and Life-Making. Extractive Industries and Society 11: 101–137.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Chris (2010). Unstuck in Time. Or: The Sudden Presence of the Past. In Tilmans, Karin, van Vree, Frank, and Winter, Jay, eds., Performing the Past: Memory, History, and Identity in Modern Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 67–102.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Chris (2017). “The Times They Are a-Changin”: On Time, Space and Periodization in History. In Carretero, Mario, Berger, Stefan, and Grever, Maria, eds., Palgrave Handbook of Research in Culture and Education. London: Palgrave, 109–131.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Chris (2019). Out of Time? Some Critical Reflections on François Hartog’s Presentism. In Tamm, Marek and Olivier, Laurent, eds., Rethinking Historical Time: New Perspectives on Presentism. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 23–42.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Chris (2021). Taking Plural Times Seriously: Comments on Ethan Kleinberg’s Koselleck lecture (Unpublished paper presented at the Institut für soziale Bewegungen, Bochum, December 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Lorenz, Chris (2022). Probing the Limits of a Metaphor: On the Stratigraphic Model in History and Geology. In Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár and Deile, Lars, eds., Historical Understanding: Past, Present, and Future. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 203–215.Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri (2009). Culture and Explosion. Trans. Wilma Clark. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri (2019). Culture, Memory and History: Essays in Cultural Semiotics. Edited by Tamm, Marek, trans. Brian James Baer. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
MacCormack, Patricia (2012). Posthuman Ethics: Embodiment and Cultural Theory. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Maffesoli, Michel (2003). L’instant éternel. Paris: La Table Ronde.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1972). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
McEwan, Cheryl (2021). Decolonizing the Anthropocene. In Chandler, David, Müller, Franziska, and Rothe, Delf, eds., International Relations in the Anthropocene: New Agendas, New Agencies and New Approaches. Cham: Palgrave, 77–94.Google Scholar
McPhee, John (1981). Basin and Range. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Meghji, Ali (2021). Decolonizing Sociology: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Mendieta, Eduardo (2020). Anthropocenic Temporalities: The Time of the End and the End of Time. Environmental Philosophy 17(1): 125–141.Google Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn (1980). The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Merchant, Carolyn (2020). The Anthropocene and the Humanities: From Climate Change to a New Age of Sustainability. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter D. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. (2020). The Chronopolitics of Racial Time. Time & Society 29(2): 297–317.Google Scholar
Mink, L. O. (1987). Historical Understanding. Edited by Fay, Brian, Golob, Eugene O., and Vann, Richard T.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Jason W., ed. (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland, CA: Kairos.Google Scholar
More, Max, and Vita-More, Natasha, eds. (2013). The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Morfino, Vittorio (2018). On Non-contemporaneity: Marx, Bloch, Althusser. In Morfino, Vittorio and Thomas, Peter D., eds., The Government of Time: Theories of Plural Temporality in the Marxist Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 117–147.Google Scholar
Morfino, Vittorio, and Thomas, Peter D. (2018). Introduction: Tempora multa. In Morfino, Vittorio and Thomas, Peter D., eds., The Government of Time: Theories of Plural Temporality in the Marxist Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 1–19.Google Scholar
Mudrovcic, María Inés (2021). Regimes of Historicity. In Bloomsbury History: Theory and Method. London: Bloomsbury. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350970854.055.Google Scholar
Alexander, Nagel, and Wood, Christopher S. (2010). Anachronic Renaissance. New York: Zone.Google Scholar
Nandy, Ashis (1995). History’s Forgotten Doubles. History and Theory 34(2): 44–66.Google Scholar
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, Sabelo J. (2018). Rhodes Must Fall. In Ndlovu-Gatsheni, Sabelo J., ed., Epistemic Freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and Decolonization. London: Routledge, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
On-cho, Ng, and Edward Wang, Q. (2005). Mirroring the Past: The Writing and Use of History in Imperial China. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Noble, Safiya Umoja (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Nordblad, Julia (2021). On the Difference between Anthropocene and Climate Change Temporalities. Critical Inquiry 47(2): 328–348.Google Scholar
Nowotny, Helga (1988). From the Future to the Extended Present: Time in Social Systems. In Kirsch, Guy, Nijkamp, Peter, and Zimmermann, Klaus, eds., The Formulation of Time Preferences in a Multi-disciplinary Perspective: Their Consequences for Individual Behaviour and Collective Decision-Making. Aldershot: Gower, 17–31.Google Scholar
Nowotny, Helga (1994). Time: The Modern and Postmodern Experience. Trans. Neville Plaice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, Emily, and Gaynor, Andrea (2020). More-Than-Human Histories. Environmental History 25(4): 711–735.Google Scholar
Olivier, Laurent (1999). The Hochdorf “Princely” Grave and the Question of the Nature of Archaeological Funerary Assemblages. In Murray, Tim, ed., Time and Archaeology. London: Routledge, 109–138.Google Scholar
Olivier, Laurent (2004). The Past of the Present. Archaeological Memory and Time. Archaeological Dialogues 10(2): 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, Laurent (2013). Time. In Graves-Brown, Paul, Harrison, Rodney, and Piccini, Angela, eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Contemporary World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 167–177.Google Scholar
Oppermann, Serpil (2018). The Scale of the Anthropocene. Mosaic: Interdisciplinary Critical Journal 51(3): 1–17.Google Scholar
Osborne, Peter (1995). The Politics of Time: Modernity and Avant-Garde. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Pereira, Mateus H. F., and Araujo, Valdei (2020). Updatism: Gumbrecht’s Broad Present, Hartog’s Presentism and Beyond. Diacronie. Studi di Storia Contemporanea 43(3): 1–20.Google Scholar
Pérez, Moira (2022). Caught between Past and Future: On the Uses of Temporal Figurations for Political Exclusion. In Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár and Deile, Lars, eds., Historical Understanding: Past, Present, and Future. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 35–43.Google Scholar
Pernau, Margrit (2019). Fluid Temporalities: Saiyid Ahmad Khan and the Concept of Modernity. History and Theory 57(4): 107–131.Google Scholar
Pernau, Margrit (2021). Emotions and Temporalities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pettai, Eva-Clarita (2018). Historical Expert Commissions and Their Politics. In Bevernage, Berber and Wouters, Nico, eds., The Palgrave Handbook of State-Sponsored History after 1945. London: Palgrave, 687–712.Google Scholar
Pinder, Wilhelm (1926). Das Problem der Generation in der Kunstgeschichte. Berlin: Frankfurter Verlags-Anstalt.Google Scholar
Pomian, Krzysztof (1984). L’ordre du temps. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Ramalho, Walderez (2020). Historical Time between Chronos and Kairos: On the Historicity of The Kairos Document Manifesto, South Africa, 1985. Rethinking History 24(3–4): 465–480.Google Scholar
Rampley, Matthew (2022). Linear, Entangled, Anachronic: Periodization and the Shapes of Time in Art History. In Kallestrup, Shona, Kunińska, Magdalena, Mihail, Mihnea Alexandru, Adashinskaya, Anna, and Minea, Cosmin, eds., Periodization in the Art Historiographies of Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Routledge, 14–28.Google Scholar
Rao, Velcheru Narayana, Shulman, David, and Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (2003). Textures of Time: Writing History in South India 1600–1800. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Geneviève, Sieber, Renée, and Blackned, Sammy (2020). Visions of Time in Geospatial Ontologies from Indigenous Peoples: A Case Study with the Eastern Cree in Northern Quebec. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 34(12): 2335–2360.Google Scholar
Retz, Tyson (2022). Progress and the Scale of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riofrancos, Thea (2017). Extractivismo Unearthed: A Genealogy of a Radical Discourse. Cultural Studies 31(2–3): 277–306.Google Scholar
Robin, Libby (2013). Histories for Changing Times: Entering the Anthropocene? Australian Historical Studies 44(3): 329–340.Google Scholar
Rockström, Johan, Steffen, Will, Noone, Kevin et al. (2009). Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society 14(2): 32. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32.Google Scholar
Rosa, Hartmut (2013). Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. Trans. Jonathan Trejo-Mathys. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rosa, Hartmut (2020). The Uncontrollability of the World. Trans. James C. Wagner. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Rovelli, Carlo (2018). The Order of Time. New York: Riverhead.Google Scholar
Runia, Eelco (2014) Moved by the Past: Discontinuity and Historical Mutation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Satia, Priya (2020). Time’s Monster: How History Makes History. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Stephen W. (2015). Time after Time: Narratives of the Longue Durée in the Anthropocene. Transatlantica 1. http://transatlantica.revues.org/7344.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Zachary Sayre (2011). The Birth of the Past. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Frederic J. (2001). Ernst Bloch and Wilhelm Pinder: Out of Sync. Grey Room 3: 54–89.Google Scholar
Serres, Michel, with Latour, Bruno (1995). Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time. Trans. Roxanne Lapidus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg (2002). The Metropolis and Mental Life. In Bridge, Gary and Watson, Sophie, eds., The Blackwell City Reader. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 11–19.Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár (2019a). History in Times of Unprecedented Change: A Theory for the 21st Century. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár (2019b). The Transformation of Historical Time: Processual and Evental Temporalities. In Tamm, Marek and Olivier, Laurent, eds., Rethinking Historical Time: New Approaches to Presentism. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 71–84.Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár (2019c). The Story of Humanity and the Challenge of Posthumanity. History of the Human Sciences 32(2): 101–120.Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár (2019d). Two Cultures of the Posthuman Future. History and Theory 58(2): 171–184.Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár (2020). The Epochal Event: Transformations in the Human, Technological, and Natural Worlds. Cham: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár (2021). Domesticating the Future through History. Time and Society 30(4): 494–516.Google Scholar
Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár, and Tamm, Marek (2021). Historical Futures. History and Theory 60(1): 3–22.Google Scholar
Smocovitis, V. B. (1992). Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Journal of the History of Biology 25(1): 1–65.Google Scholar
Sörlin, Sverker (2022). Environmental Times: Synchronizing Human-Earth Temporalities from Annales to Anthropocene, 1920s–2020s. In Ekström, Anders and Bergwik, Staffan, eds., Times of History, Times of Nature: Temporalization and the Limits of Modern Knowledge. New York: Berghahn, 64–101.Google Scholar
Sörlin, Sverker, and Isberg, Erik (2021). Synchronizing Earthly Timescales: Ice, Pollen, and the Making of Proto-Anthropocene Knowledge in the North Atlantic Region. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111(3): 717–728.Google Scholar
Sorokin, Pitirim A., and Merton, Robert K. (1937). Social Time: A Methodological and Functional Analysis. American Journal of Sociology 42(5): 615–629.Google Scholar
Santos, Sousa, Boaventura de, (2009). A Non-Occidentalist West? Learned Ignorance and Ecology of Knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society 26(7–8): 103–125.Google Scholar
Steffen, Will, Broadgate, Wendy, Deutsch, Lisa, Gaffney, Owen, and Ludwig, Cornelia. (2015a). The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration. Anthropocene Review 2(1): 81–98.Google Scholar
Steffen, Will, Katherine, Richardson, Johan, Rockström et al. (2015b). Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet. Science 347(6223): 1259855.Google Scholar
Steffen, Will, Reinhold, Leinfelder, Jan, Zalasiewicz et al. (2016). Stratigraphic and Earth System Approaches to Defining the Anthropocene. Earth’s Future 4: 324–345.Google Scholar
Steffen, Will, Katherine, Richardson, Johan, Rockström et al. (2020). The Emergence and Evolution of Earth System Science. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 1: 54–63.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, Willibald, Boldizsár Simon, Zoltán, and Postoutenko, Kirill (2021). Temporal Comparisons: Evaluating the World through Historical Time. Time & Society 30(4): 447–461.Google Scholar
Edward, Swenson, and Roddick, Andrew P. (2018). Introduction: Rethinking Temporality and Historicity from the Perspective of Andean Archaeology. In Swenson, Edward and Roddick, Andrew, eds., Constructions of Time and History in the Pre-Columbian Andes. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, 3–43.Google Scholar
Taillandier, Apolline (2021). “Staring into the Singularity” and Other Posthuman Tales: Transhumanist Stories of Future Change. History and Theory 60(2): 215–233.Google Scholar
Táíwò, Olúfẹ́mi O. (2022). Reconsidering Reparations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tamm, Marek (2015). Introduction: Afterlife of Events: Perspectives on Mnemohistory. In Tamm, Marek, ed., Afterlife of Events: Perspectives on Mnemohistory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–23.Google Scholar
Tamm, Marek (2019). Introduction: Juri Lotman’s Semiotic Theory of History and Cultural Memory. In Tamm, Marek, ed., Juri Lotman. Culture, Memory and History: Essays in Cultural Semiotics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–26.Google Scholar
Tamm, Marek (2022a). Future-Oriented History. In Simon, Zoltán Boldizsár and Deile, Lars, eds., Historical Understanding: Past, Present, and Future. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 131–140.Google Scholar
Tamm, Marek (2022b). Lotman and Cultural History. In Tamm, Marek and Torop, Peeter, eds., The Companion to Juri Lotman: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 334–349.Google Scholar
Tamm, Marek, and Olivier, Laurent (2019). Introduction: Rethinking Historical Time. In Tamm, Marek and Olivier, Laurent, eds., Rethinking Historical Time: New Approaches to Presentism. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 1–20.Google Scholar
Tamm, Marek, and Boldizsár Simon, Zoltán (2020). Historical Thinking and the Human: Introduction. Journal of the Philosophy of History 14(3): 285–309.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Stefan (2019). History without Chronology. Amherst, MA: Lever Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Julia Adeney (2014). History and Biology in the Anthropocene: Problems of Scale, Problems of Value. American Historical Review 119(5): 1587–1607.Google Scholar
Thomas, Julia Adeney (2019). Why the “Anthropocene” Is Not “Climate Change” and Why It Matters. Asia Global Online, January 10. www.asiaglobalonline.hku.hk/anthropocene-climate-change.Google Scholar
Thomas, Julia Adeney, ed. (2022). Altered Earth: Getting the Anthropocene Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Peter D. (2017). The Plural Temporalities of Hegemony. Rethinking Marxism 29(2): 281–302.Google Scholar
Tomba, Massimiliano (2013). Marx’s Temporalities. Trans. Peter D. Thomas and Sara R. Farris. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Torpey, John (2003). Introduction: Politics and the Past. In Torpey, John, ed., Politics and the Past: On Repairing Historical Injustices. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1–34.Google Scholar
Torres, Felipe (2022). Temporal Regimes: Materiality, Politics, Technology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Urry, John (2000). Sociology beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Veland, Siri, and Lynch, Amanda H. (2016). Scaling the Anthropocene: How the Stories We Tell Matter. Geoforum 72: 1–5.Google Scholar
Vinge, Vernor (1993). The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-human Era. In Vision-21: Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in the Era of Cyberspace. Proceedings of a Symposium Cosponsored by the NASA Lewis Research Center and the Ohio Aerospace Institute, Westlake, Ohio, March 30–31, 1993, 11–22. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19940022856.Google Scholar
Virilio, Paul (1986). Speed and Politics: An Essay on Dromology. Trans. Mark Polizzotti. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Virilio, Paul (2010). The Futurism of the Instant: Stop-Eject. Trans. Julie Rose. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Virilio, Paul (2012). The Great Accelerator. Trans. Julie Rose. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Wajcman, Judy (2015). Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Cheryl B. (2003). Colonial Violence and the Rhetoric of Evasion: Tocqueville on Algeria. Political Theory 31(2): 235–264.Google Scholar
West-Pavlov, Russell (2013). Temporalities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whyte, Kyle (2017). Indigenous Climate Change Studies: Indigenizing Futures, Decolonizing the Anthropocene. English Language Notes 55(1–2): 153–162.Google Scholar
Wiggin, Bethany, Fornoff, Carolyn, and Eunji Kim, Patricia (2020). Introduction: Environmental Humanities across Times, Disciplines, and Research Practices. In Wiggin, Bethany, Fornoff, Carolyn, and Kim, Patricia Eunji, eds., Timescales: Thinking across Ecological Temporalities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, vii–xxviii.Google Scholar
Witmore, Christopher (2006). Vision, Media, Noise and the Percolation of Time. Journal of Material Culture 11(3): 267–292.Google Scholar
Woolf, Daniel (2021). Getting Back to Normal: On Normativity in History and Historiography. History and Theory 60(3): 469–512.Google Scholar
Zalasiewicz, Jan, Waters, Colin N., Ellis, Erle C., Head, Martin J., Vidas, Davor, Steffen, Will et al. (2021). The Anthropocene: Comparing Its Meaning in Geology (Chronostratigraphy) with Conceptual Approaches Arising in Other Disciplines. Earth’s Future 9(3): 1–25.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Fabric of Historical Time
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Fabric of Historical Time
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Fabric of Historical Time
Available formats
×