Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:34:07.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Public Policy

Integrating Logics in the Governance of Emerging Technologies

The Case of Nanotechnology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2021

Derrick Mason Anderson  and
Andrew Whitford
Derrick Mason Anderson
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Andrew Whitford
Affiliation:
University of Georgia

Summary

The governance of emerging technologies does not follow a single governance paradigm because of complex interactions between government, industry, and civil actors. In this Element, we will argue that for emerging technologies, governance is a 'convergent paradigm'. We introduce governance issues associated with emerging technologies generally before turning to the specifics of nanotechnology. We then approach governance theory and practice by considering different perspectives on governance by their different orientations with respect to object and process. Finally, we construct a matrix of object and process oriented governance activities observed in the case of nanotechnology in the United States.
Get access

Keywords

governanceemerging technologiespublic policypublic management
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Public Policy
Online ISBN: 9781108592024
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 24 June 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). (2019). Mission and history. AAAS website. www.aaas.org/mission, accessed April 5, 2019.Google Scholar
Ackerman, J. (2004). Co-governance for accountability: Beyond “exit” and “voice.” World Development, 32(3), 447–463. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ACS (American Chemical Society). (2019a). ACS vision and messages. ACS website. www.acs.org/content/acs/en/about.html?sc=180808_GlobalFooter_od, accessed April 5, 2019.Google Scholar
ACS (American Chemical Society). (2019b). Nanotechnology. ACS website. www.acs.org/content/acs/en/policy/nanotechnology.html, accessed April 5, 2019.Google Scholar
Adhikari, B. (2001). Socio-economic heterogeneity and income distribution: Evidence from common property resource management. Journal of Forestry and Livelihoods, 1, 22–24.Google Scholar
AIChE (American Institute of Chemical Engineers). (2019). Overview. AIChE website. www.aiche.org/topics/overview, accessed April 5, 2019.Google Scholar
Anderson, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Agenda setting in emergent R&D policy subsystems: Examining discourse effects of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act. Review of Policy Research, 30(5), 447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D., Slade, C. P., & Karinen, R. (2010). Governance and management of nanotechnology research and development in the United States. Paper presented at the Annual Commercialization of Micro- and Nano- Systems Conference, Albuquerque, NM, September 2.Google Scholar
ANSI (American National Standards Institute). (2016). ANSI nanotechnology standards panel. ANSI website. www.ansi.org/standards_activities/standards_boards_panels/nsp/overview.aspx?menuid=3, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
APS (American Physics Society). (2019). Strategic plan. APS website. www.aps.org/about/strategicplan/index.cfm, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
Arizona State University. (2019). The Center for Nanotechnology in Society: About. Arizona State University website. http://cns.asu.edu/about, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Asghari, H., Van Eeten, M., & Mueller, M. (2013). Internet measurements and public policy: Mind the gap. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2294456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers). (2019a). About ASME. ASME website. accessedApril 8, 2019. www.asme.org/about-asmeGoogle Scholar
ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers). (2019b). Nanotechnology [Search]. ASME website. www.asme.org/search/?q=nanotechnology, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). (2010). Nanotechnology standards. ASTM website. www.astm.org/Standards/nanotechnology-standards.html, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). (2019a). About us. ASTM website. www.astm.org/ABOUT/overview.html, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials). (2019b). Nanotechnology [Search]. ASTM website. www.astm.org/search/fullsite-search.html?query=nanotechnology&resStart=0&resLength=10&toplevel=products-and-services&sublevel=standards-and-publications&dltype=allstd&, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
AVS (American Vacuum Society). (2019). About AVS. AVS website. www.avs.org/about, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
Bagnoli, M., & McKee, M. (1991). Voluntary contribution games: Efficient private provision of public goods. Economic Inquiry, 29(2), 351–366.Google Scholar
Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of governance and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 185–205.Google Scholar
Baron, D. P. (2003). Business and its environment. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bequette, M., Cardiel, C. L. B., Cohn, S., Kollmann, E. K., & Lawrenz, F. (2019). Evaluation capacity building for informal STEM education: Working for success across the field. In A. C. Fu, A. Kannan, & R. J. Shavelson (eds.), Evaluation in Informal Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. New Directions for Evaluation, 161, 107–123. https://doi-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1002/ev.20351Google Scholar
Berger, M. (2007). Debunking the trillion dollar nanotechnology market size hype. Nanowerk, April 19. www.nanowerk.com/spotlight/spotid=1792.php, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., & Varian, H. (1986). On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 29(1), 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T., & Coate, S. (1991). Public provision of private goods and the redistribution of income. The American Economic Review, 81(4), 979–984.Google Scholar
Besley, T., & Coate, S. (2003). Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: A political economy approach. Journal of Public Economics, 87(12), 2611–2637.Google Scholar
Blackman, A. (2008). Can voluntary environmental regulation work in developing countries? Lessons from case studies. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 119–141.Google Scholar
Bolle, F. (1986). On the oligopolistic extraction of non-renewable common-pool resources. Economica, 53(212), 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boon, W., & Moors, E. (2008). Exploring emerging technologies using metaphors: A study of orphan drugs and pharmacogenomics. Social Science and Medicine, 66(9), 1915–1927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.012Google Scholar
Bowman, D. M., & Hodge, G. A. (2007). A small matter of regulation: An international review of nanotechnology regulation. Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, 8(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. (2006). NSF gives Rice $12 M to study nanotech. Rice News, September 21. http://news.rice.edu/2006/09/21/nsf-gives-rice-12m-to-study-nanotechs-impact-on-health-for-next-five-years/, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Boyle, J. (1997). A politics of intellectual property: Environmentalism for the Net?. Duke Law Journal, 8(1), 87–116. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol47/iss1/272:561/Google Scholar
Brabham, D. C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving an introduction and cases. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 14(1), 75–90. http://doi.org/10.1177/1354856507084420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer-Hoffmann, S., Halamoda-Kenzaoui, B., & Borgos, S. E. (2018). Identification of regulatory needs for nanomedicines. Journal of Interdisciplinary Nanomedicine, 3(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jin2.34Google Scholar
Bresnahan, T. F., & Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies “Engines of growth”?. Journal of Econometrics, 65(1),83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, D. W. (1991). Environment and the economy: Property rights and public policy. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003). Contract-management capacity in municipal and county governments. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 153–164.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1965). An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.2307/2552442Google Scholar
Bush, V. (1945). Science: The endless frontier. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 48(3), 231–264. http://doi.org/10.2307/3625196Google Scholar
Cabello, R. S., Vega-Baudrit, J., Zuluaga, R., & Gañán, P. (2019). Statistical approach to regulation of nanotechnology: Need, advantages and disadvantages. Journal of Biomaterials and Nanobiotechnology, 11(1), 14–32.Google Scholar
Cadsby, C. B., & Maynes, E. (1999). Voluntary provision of threshold public goods with continuous contributions: Experimental evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 71(1), 53–73.Google Scholar
CCR (Council for Chemical Research). (2016). Council for Chemical Research reorganizes under AichE. CCR press release. www.aiche.org/about/press/releases/02–02-2016/council-chemical-research-reorganizes-under-aiche, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
CCR (Council for Chemical Research). (2019). Council for Chemical Research. CCR website. http://ccrhq.org/, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). (2019a). Nanotechnology at NIOSH. CDC website. www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nanotech/nanotechnology-research-center.html, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). (2019b). About NIOSH. CDC website. www.cdc.gov/niosh/about/default.html, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Certomà, C., Corsini, F., & Rizzi, F. (2014). Crowdsourcing urban sustainability: Data, people and technologies in participatory governance. Futures, 74, 93–106. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CFS (Center for Food Safety). (2019a). About Center for Food Safety. CFS website. www.centerforfoodsafety.org/about-us, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
CFS (Center for Food Safety). (2019b). About nanotechnology. CFS website. www.centerforfoodsafety.org/issues/682/nanotechnology/about-nanotechnology, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Clunan, A., & Rodine-Hardy, K. (2014). Nanotechnology in a globalized world: Strategic assessments of an emerging technology. Report. Center on Contemporary Conflict. https://calhoun.nps.edu/handle/10945/43101, accessed January 13, 2016.Google Scholar
CNS-ASU (Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University). (2016). About CNS-ASU. CNS-ASU website. http://cns.asu.edu/about/, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
Cornes, R., & Sandler, T. (1996). The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
CRN (Center for Responsible Nanotechnology). (2019a). About us. CRN website. www.crnano.org/about_us.htm, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
CRN (Center for Responsible Nanotechnology). (2019b). Mission. CRN website. www.crnano.org/index.html#Mission, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
DoD (US Department of Defense). (2019). Our story. DoD website. www.defense.gov/Our-Story/, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
Dowling, S. A. (1994). Information access: Public goods or private goods? Social Science Computer Review, 12(3), 333–350. http://doi.org/10.1177/089443939401200301Google Scholar
EDF (Environmental Defense Fund). (2005). Getting nanotechnology right the first time. Balbus, R. Denison, K. Florini, S. Walsh (authors). Issues in Science and Technology. Summer 2005. www.edf.org/sites/default/files/4816_nanotechstatementNAS.pdf, accessed January 13, 2016.Google Scholar
EDF (Environmental Defense Fund). (2019a). About Environmental Defense Fund. EDF website. www.edf.org/about, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
EDF (Environmental Defense Fund). (2019b). Our mission and values. EDF website. www.edf.org/our-mission-and-values, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
EDF (Environmental Defense Fund). (2019c). Past EDF work on nanotechnology policy. EDF website. www.edf.org/health/policy/nanotechnology, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
EDF (Environmental Defense Fund). (2020). Our finances. EDF website. www.edf.org/finances, accessed December 7, 2020.Google Scholar
EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (2009a). Nanotechnology: An EPA research perspective factsheet.Google Scholar
EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (2009b). Nanomaterial research strategy. www.nano.gov/node/980, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). (2019). Our mission and what we do. EPA website. www.epa.gov/aboutepa/our-mission-and-what-we-do, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Epple, D., & Romano, R. E. (1996). Public provision of private goods. Journal of Political Economy, 104(1), 57–84.Google Scholar
ETC Group (Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration). (2001). Rafi becomes ETC Group. ETC Group website. www.etcgroup.org/content/rafi-becomes-etc-group, accessed April 5, 2019.Google Scholar
ETC Group (Erosion, Technology and Concentration). (2016). Nanotechnology. ETC Group website. www.etcgroup.org/issues/nanotechnology, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
ETC Group (Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration). (2019). Mission & current focus. ETC Group website. www.etcgroup.org/mission, accessed April 5, 2019.Google Scholar
ETC Group (Action Group on Erosion Technology and Concentration). (n.d.). Mission & Current focus. ETC Group website. www.etcgroup.org/mission, accessed November 30, 2020.Google Scholar
Exploratorium. (2019a). About us. Exploratorium website. www.exploratorium.edu/about-us, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Exploratorium. (2019b). Visitor research & evaluation [Filter: Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network]. Exploratorium website. www.exploratorium.edu/education/visitor-research/reports?field_pdf_author_target_id=All&field_vre_projects_tid=606&field_vre_study_tid=All&field_vre_content_domain_tid=All&title=, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Fang, H., & Norman, P. (2013). Toward an efficiency rationale for the public provision of private goods. Economic Theory, 56(2), 375–408. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-013–0790-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, H. (2003). Constructing the international foundations of e-commerce: The EU-U.S. Safe Harbor Arrangement. International Organization, 57(02), 277–306. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818303572022Google Scholar
FDA (US Food and Drug Administration). (2009). Nanotechnology Task Force Report 2007. www.fda.gov/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/Nanotechnology/ucm2006659.htmGoogle Scholar
FDA (US Food and Drug Administration). (2010). The Food and Drug Administration, Science and Research, Nanotechnology Program at FDA. www.fda.gov/science-research/science-and-research-special-topics/nanotechnology-programs-fda, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
FDA (US Food & Drug Administration). (2019a). What we do. FDA website. www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WhatWeDo/default.htm, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
FDA (US Food & Drug Administration). (2019b). Nanotechnology Task Force. FDA website. www.fda.gov/scienceresearch/specialtopics/nanotechnology/ucm2006658.htm, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Fisher, F. (2012). Participatory governance: From theory to practice. In Levi-Faur, David (ed.) The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 457–471). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/eae3/b558ee629df8e853320644b515573ee71c99.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, G. (2010). The effects of energy co-governance in Peru. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2234–2244. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.011Google Scholar
Fung, A. & Wright, E. O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovation in empowered participatory governance. Politics & Society, 29(1), 5–41.Google Scholar
Garner, M. C. (2006). ICON NanoEHS research roadmap proposal. International Council on Nanotechnology. http://cohesion.rice.edu/CentersAndInst/ICON/emplibrary/Garner%20-%20ICON%20Research%20Needs%20Roadmap.pdf, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
Garson, G. D. (2003). Toward an information technology research agenda for public administration. In Garson, G. D. (ed.), Public information technology: Policy and management issues (pp. 331–357). IGI Global.Google Scholar
Gbikpi, B., & Grote, J. R. (2002). From democratic governance to participatory governance. In Grote, J. R. & Gbikpi, B. (eds.), Participatory governance: Political and societal implications (pp. 17–34). Springer.Google Scholar
Gehrke, P. J. (2017). Nano-Publics: Communicating nanotechnology applications, risks, and regulations. Springer.Google Scholar
Gray, V., & Lowery, D. (1996). Environmental limits on the diversity of state interest organization systems: A population ecology interpretation. Political Research Quarterly, 49(1),103–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/449043Google Scholar
Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.xGoogle Scholar
Guston, D. H. (1999). Evaluating the first U.S. Consensus Conference: The impact of the citizens’ panel on telecommunications and the future of democracy. Science, Technology & Human Values, 24(4), 451–482. http://doi.org/10.1177/016224399902400402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guston, D. H. (2007). The Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University and the prospects for anticipatory governance. In Cameron, N. & Mitchell, M. E. (eds.), Nanoscale: Issues and Perspectives for the Nano Century (pp. 377–392). Wiley.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, N. L., Hilborn, R., & Defeo, O. (2011). Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature, 470(7334), 386–389.Google Scholar
Hamlett, P., Cobb, M. D., & Guston, D. H. (2013). National citizens’ technology forum: Nanotechnologies and human enhancement. In Hays, S., Robert, J., Miller, C., & Bennett, I. (eds.), Nanotechnology, the Brain, and the Future (pp. 265–283). Springer.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (2007). Ways of knowing: New approaches in the anthropology of knowledge and learning. Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Harvard University. (2019). Center for Nanoscale Systems: About. Center for Nanoscale Systems website. https://cns1.rc.fas.harvard.edu/about/, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Henisz, W. J., & Williamson, O. E. (1999). Comparative economic organization: Within and between countries. Business and Politics, 1(3), 261–277.Google Scholar
Héritier, A. (2002). Common goods: Reinventing European integration governance. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2003). Ideas, artifacts, and facilities: Information as a common pool resource. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66(1/2), 11–135.Google Scholar
HHS (US Department of Health and Human Services). (2019). Research at HHS operating divisions. HHS website. www.hhs.gov/programs/research/research-hhs-operating-divisions.html, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
Hull, M., & Bowman, D. (eds.). (2018). Nanotechnology environmental health and safety: risks, regulation, and management. William Andrew.Google Scholar
IANANO (International Association of Nanotechnology). (2019). About us. IANANO website. www.ianano.org/aboutus.htm, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
ICTA (International Center for Technology Assessment). (2016a). Nanotechnology. ICTA website. www.icta.org/nanotechnology/, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
ICTA (International Center for Technology Assessment). (2016b). Legal actions. ICTA website. www.icta.org/nanotechnology/legal-actions-6/, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). (2019). About the Nanotechnology Council. IEEE website. https://ieeenano.org/about/, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
iGATE Research. (2018). Global nanotechnology market (by component and applications), funding & investment, patent analysis and 27 companies profile & recent developments – forecast to 2024. Report, April. www.researchandmarkets.com/research/zc7qgf/global?w=5Google Scholar
ILSI (International Life Sciences Institute). (2016). Home. ILSI website. https://ilsi.org/, accessed January 16, 2014.Google Scholar
ILSI (International Life Sciences Institute). (2019a). Mission & operating principles. ILSI website. https://ilsi.org/about/mission/, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
ILSI (International Life Sciences Institute). (2019b). Nanotechnology [Search]. ILSI website. https://ilsi.org/search/?k=nanotechnology&ks=1&kt=any, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Inshakova, E., & Inshakov, O. (2017). World market for nanomaterials: Structure and trends. MATEC Web of Conferences, 129. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712902013Google Scholar
INSN (International Nanotechnology and Society Network). (2016). Home. INSN website. www.nanoandsociety.com/, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
IRGC (International Risk Governance Council). (2005). Survey on nanotechnology governance, Volume A: The role of government. IRGC Working Group on Nanotechnology.Google Scholar
IRGC (International Risk Governance Council). (2006), Nanotechnology risk governance, IRGC Working Group on Nanotechnology. https://irgc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/IRGC_white_paper_2_PDF_final_version-2.pdf, accessed January 19, 2021.Google Scholar
IRGC (International Risk Governance Council). (2016). Nanotechnology risk governance – project overview. IRGC website. www.irgc.org/issues/nanotechnology/nanotechnology-risk-governance/, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
IRGC (International Risk Governance Council). (2019a). About IRGC. IRGC website. https://irgc.org/about/, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
IRGC (International Risk Governance Council). (2019b). Nanotechnology. IRGC website. https://irgc.org/issues/nanotechnology/, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (1995). The regulation approach, governance, and post-Fordism: Alternative perspectives on economic and political change? Economy and Society, 24(3), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149500000013Google Scholar
Johnson, T. M., & Hamilton, J. (1994). Self-governance for Indian tribes: From paternalism to empowerment. Connecticut Law Review, 27, 1251.Google Scholar
Kim, O., & Walker, M. (1984). The free rider problem: Experimental evidence. Public Choice, 43(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
Kleinwächter, W. (2003). Global governance in the information age. Development, 46(1), 17–25.Google Scholar
Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). Governance and globalization: Conceptualizing the role of public and private actors. In Heritier, A. (ed.), Common goods: Reinventing European and international governance (pp. 85–104). Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Kolln, K., & Prakash, A. (2002). EMS-based environmental regimes as club goods: Examining variations in firm-level adoption of ISO 14001 and EMAS in U.K., U.S. and Germany. Policy Sciences, 35(1), 43–67. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016071810725Google Scholar
Koppell, J. G. (2010). World rule: Accountability, legitimacy, and the design of global governance. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormendi, R. (1983). Government debt, government spending, and private sector behavior. The American Economic Review, 73(5), 994–1010. www.jstor.org/stable/1814667Google Scholar
Larsson, S., Jansson, M., & Boholm, Å. (2019). Expert stakeholders’ perception of nanotechnology: Risk, benefit, knowledge, and regulation. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 21(3), 57.Google Scholar
Litvinski, O. (2018). Emerging technology: Toward a conceptual definition. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 9(6), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2018.9.6.625Google Scholar
Lux Research. (2014). Nanotechnology update: Corporations up their spending as revenues for nano-enabled products increase. Report, February 17. https://members.luxresearchinc.com/research/report/13748, accessed April 18, 2019.Google Scholar
Lyon, T. P. (2013). The pros and cons of voluntary approaches to environmental regulation. Paper presented at Reflections on Responsible Regulation Conference, Tulane University, March 1–2.Google Scholar
Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. (2000). Voluntary approaches to environmental protection. In Bonser, C. F. (eds.), Security, trade, and environmental policy (pp. 259–265). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4399-2_28Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1992). Ideas, interests and policy change. European University Institute Working Paper No. 92(21). https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/223/1992_EUIWP_SPS_021.pdf?sequence=1Google Scholar
Malkin, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1991). Why the traditional distinction between public and private goods should be abandoned. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(4), 355–378. http://doi.org/10.1177/0951692891003004001Google Scholar
Maloney, W., Smith, G. & Stoker, G. (2000). Social capital and urban governance: Adding a more contextualized “top-down” perspective. Political Studies, 48(4), 802–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00284Google Scholar
MANCEF. (2019). About MANCEF. MANCEF website. www.mancef.org/about/, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Martin, B. R. (1995). Foresight in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 7(2),139–168.Google Scholar
Marwell, G., & Ames, R. E. (1979). Experiments on the provision of public goods: I. Resources, interest, group size, and the free rider problem. American Journal of Sociology, 84(6), 1335–1360.Google Scholar
Maryland State Archives. (2019). Interstate agencies. Maryland.gov website. https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/38inters/defunct/html/14nan.html, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
Maskus, K. E., & Reichman, J. H. (2004). The globalization of private knowledge goods and the privatization of global public goods. Journal of International Economic Law, 7(2), 279–320. http://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.2.279Google Scholar
Maynard, A. D. (2011). Don’t define nanomaterials. Nature, 475(7354), 31.Google Scholar
Maynard, A. D. (2016). Is nanotech failing casual learners?. Nature nanotechnology, 11(9), 734–735.Google Scholar
Maynard, A., Bowman, D., & Hodge, G. (2011). The problem of regulating sophisticated materials. Nature materials, 10(8), 554–557.Google Scholar
Maynard, A. D., & Kidd, J. (2018). Are assumptions of consumer views impeding nano-based water treatment technologies?. Nature nanotechnology, 13(8), 673–674.Google Scholar
McGuire, M. (1974). Group segregation and optimal jurisdictions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 112–132.Google Scholar
McNutt, P. (1999). Public goods and club goods. Encyclopedia of law and economics. http://s1.downloadmienphi.net/file/downloadfile4/147/1389845.pdfGoogle Scholar
Meridian Institute. (2016). International dialogue on responsible research and development of nanotechnology. Report. http://merid.org/Content/Projects/International_Dialogue_on_Responsible_Research_and_Development_of_Nanotechnology.aspx, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
Meridian Institute. (2019a). About Meridian. Meridian Institute website. www.merid.org/About.aspx, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Meridian Institute. (2019b). Nanotechnology and development news. Meridian Institute website. http://merid.org/en/Content/Projects/Nanotechnology_and_Development_News.aspx, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Miernicki, M., Hofmann, T., Eisenberger, I., von der Kammer, F., & Praetorius, A. (2019). Legal and practical challenges in classifying nanomaterials according to regulatory definitions. Nature nanotechnology, 14(3), 208–216.Google Scholar
Molians, J. R. (1998). The impact of inequality, gender, external assistance and social capital on local-level collective action. World Development, 26(3), 413–431.Google Scholar
Morris, J., & Willis, J. (2007). US Environmental Protection Agency nanotechnology white paper. US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
MRS (Materials Research Society). (2018). Letter from MRS president to the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. www.mrs.org/docs/default-source/advocacy-policy/issues/mrs-president-letter-to-eddie-bernice-johnson-cmte-on-science_june2018-r-_.pdf?sfvrsn=93c57010_0, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
MRS (Materials Research Society). (2019). About MRS. MRS website. www.mrs.org/about-mrs, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Murdock, S., Crosby, S., Stein, B., & Swami, N. (2005). Regional, state, and local initiatives in nanotechnology: Report of the National Technology Initiative Workshop: September 30-October 1, 2003. National Nanotechnology Coordination Office.Google Scholar
Museum of Science. (2019a). About us. Museum of Science website. www.mos.org/about-us, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Museum of Science. (2019b). Nanotechnology at the museum. Museum of Science website. www.mos.org/nano, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
NanoBusiness Alliance. (2019). About us. NanoBusiness Alliance website. www.nanobusiness.org/index-php/about/, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Triennial review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23603Google Scholar
National Center for Learning and Teaching in Nanoscale Science and Engineering. (2019). About NCLT. NCLT website. www.nclt.us/about_nclt, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
National Nanomanufacturing Network. (2019). International Nanotechnology and Society Network. InterNano.org website. www.internano.org/node/1124, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L., & Sanderson, S. (1995). Property, politics and wildlife conservation. World Development, 23(8), 1265–1275.Google Scholar
NCLT (National Center for Learning and Teaching in Nanoscale Science and Engineering). (2010). About NCLT. NCLT website. www.nclt.us/about-mission.shtml, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (1989). What is private and what is public about technology? Science, Technology & Human Values, 14(3), 229–241. http://doi.org/10.1177/016224398901400302Google Scholar
Netanel, N. W. (2000). Cyberspace self-governance: A skeptical view from liberal democratic theory. California Law Review, 88(2), 395–498.Google Scholar
Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2009). More input – better output: Does citizen involvement improve environmental governance. In Blühdorn, I. (ed.), Search of Legitimacy: Policy Making in Europe and the Challenge of Complexity, Opladen, Farmington Hills (pp. 205–224). Verlag Barbara Budrich.Google Scholar
NIH (National Institutes of Health). (2016). About the NIH common fund. NIH website. https://commonfund.nih.gov/about, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
NIH (National Institutes of Health). (2017). Cancer and nanotechnology. NIH website. www.cancer.gov/sites/nano/cancer-nanotechnology, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
NIH (National Institutes of Health). (2019). Home. NIH website. www.nih.gov/, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). (2019). Program description, January 16. www.cdc.gov/niosh/programs/nano/description.html, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
NISENet (Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network). (2016). Welcome to the NISE Network. NISENet website. www.nisenet.org/about, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
NISENet (Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network). (2019). NISENet website. www.nisenet.org/nano, accessed November 30, 2020.Google Scholar
NIST (National Institute for Standards and Technology). (2015). Characterization, nanometrology, and nanoscale measurements portal. NIST website. www.nist.gov/characterization-nanometrology-and-nanoscale-measurements-portal.cfm, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). (2019a). NIST mission, vision, core competencies, and core values. NIST website. www.nist.gov/about-nist/our-organization/mission-vision-values, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). (2019b). Nanotechnology [Search results]. NIST website. www.nist.gov/fusion-search?start=0&sort=relevance&s=nanotechnology, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
NNCI (National Nanotechnology Coordinated Infrastructure). (2019). About the NNCI. NNCI website. www.nnci.net/about-nnci, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
NNCO (National Nanotechnology Coordination Office). (2011). National Nanotechnology Initiative strategic plan. www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/2011_strategic_plan.pdf, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
NNI (US National Nanotechnology Initiative). (2014). NNI supplement to the president’s 2015 budget. www.nano.gov/node/1128, accessed January 13, 2016.Google Scholar
NNI (US National Nanotechnology Initiative). (2015). Resources at the regional, state, and local level. www.nano.gov/initiatives/commercial/state-local, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
NNI (US National Nanotechnology Initiative). (2019a). Department of Defense (DoD). Nano.gov website. www.nano.gov/node/144, accessed April 8, 2019.Google Scholar
NNI (US National Nanotechnology Initiative). (2019b). International Council on Nanotechnology (ICON) and Rice University Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology (CBEN) online database of scientific findings related to the benefits and risks of nanotechnology. www.nano.gov/node/121, accessed April 9, 2019.Google Scholar
NNI (US National Nanotechnology Initiative). (2019c). Nanotechnology Environmental and Health Implications (NEHI) working group. Nano.gov website. www.nano.gov/nehi, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
NNI (US National Nanotechnology Initiative). (2019d). National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (NNCO). Nano.gov website. www.nano.gov/about-nni/nnco, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
NNI (US National Nanotechnology Initiative). (2019e.). About the NNI. Nano.gov website.www.nano.gov/about-nni, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
NNIN (National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network). (2015). About NNIN. NNIN website. www.nnin.org/nnin_about.html, accessed August 1, 2015.Google Scholar
NOISH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). (2008). Strategic plan for NIOSH nanotechnology research and guidance. www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nanotech/pdfs/NIOSH_Nanotech_Strategic_Plan.pdf, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
NOISH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). (2009). Approaches to Safe nanotechnology: Managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered nanomaterials. www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2009–125/, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
NRDC (National Resources Defense Council). (2007). Nanotechnologies are here, but questions of safety linger. www.nrdc.org/health/nano.asp, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
NRDC (National Resources Defense Council). (2019a). About us. NRDC website. www.nrdc.org/about, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
NRDC (National Resources Defense Council). (2019b). NRDC advances regulation of nanotechnology to protect human health. Press release. www.nrdc.org/media/2007/070515, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
NSET (Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology, Committee on Technology, National Science and Technology Council). (2007). National Nanotechnology Initiative: Strategic plan.Google Scholar
NSF (National Science Foundation). (2003). Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/Report/NBIC_report.pdf, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
NSF (National Science Foundation). (2005). Press release 05–179: New grants are awarded to inform the public and explore the implications of nanotechnology. http://nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=104505&org=olpa&from=news, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
NSF (National Science Foundation). (2014). Market report on emerging nanotechnology now available. www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=130586, accessed April 18, 2019.Google Scholar
NSTC (National Science and Technology Council). (2014). The national nanotechnology initiative. www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/pub_resource/nni_fy15_budget_supplement.pdf, accessed January 16, 2016.Google Scholar
NTP (National Toxicology Program). (2015). NTP nanotechnology safety initiative. http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/index.cfm?objectid=7E6B19D0-BDB5-82F8-FAE73011304F542A, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action; public goods and the theory of groups (rev. ed.). Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Olson, M. & Zeckhauser, R. (1967). Collective goods, comparative advantage, and alliance efficiency. In McKean, R. (ed.), Issues in Defense Economics. (pp. 25–63). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1989). Microconstitutional change in multiconstitutional political systems. Rationality and Society, 1(1), 11–50.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1991). Rational choice theory and institutional analysis: Toward complementarity. The American Political Science Review, 85(1),237–243. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962889Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review, 86(02), 404–417.Google Scholar
Oszakiewski, R. (2010). H.R. 5786 “Safe Cosmetics Act of 2010” introduced. Technology Law Source, July 26. www.technologylawsource.com/2010/07/articles/nanotechnology/hr-5786-safe-cosmetics-act-of-2010-introduced/, accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
PCAST (President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology). (2010), Report to the president and Congress on the third assessment of the national nanotechnology initiative. www.broadinstitute.org/files/sections/about/PCAST/2010%20pcast-nni.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pew Charitable Trusts. (2019a). Mission & values. Pew Charitable Trusts website. www.pewtrusts.org/en/about/mission-and-values, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Pew Charitable Trusts. (2019b). Project on emerging nanotechnologies. Pew Charitable Trusts website. www.pewtrusts.org/en/projects/archived-projects/project-on-emerging-nanotechnologies, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Jin, X. Y., & Newman, N. C. (2002). Measuring national “emerging technology” capabilities. Science and Public Policy, 29(3), 189–200.Google Scholar
Prakash, A., & Potoski, M. (2006). Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 350–364.Google Scholar
Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. (2019). Mission statement, www.nanotechproject.org, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Radatz, A., Reinsborough, M., Fisher, E., Corley, E., & Guston, D. (2019). An assessment of engaged social science research in nanoscale science and engineering communities. Science and Public Policy, 46(6), 853–865.Google Scholar
Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.xGoogle Scholar
Roco, M. (2004), Nanoscale science and engineering: Unifying and transforming tools. AIChE Journal, 50(5), 890–897.Google Scholar
Roco, M. (2006). National nanotechnology initiative: Past, present, future. In Goddard, W., Brenner, D., Lyshevski, S. E. & Iafrate, G. J. (eds.), Handbook on nanoscience, engineering and technology (2nd ed., pp. 3.1–3.26). Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Roco, M. (2011). The long view of nanotechnology development: The National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years. In Roco, M. C., Hersam, M. C., & Mirkin, C. A. (eds.), Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020 (pp. 1–28). Springer.Google Scholar
Roco, M. (2017). Affirmation of nanotechnology between 2000 and 2030. In Mensah, T. O., Wang, B., Bothun, G., Winter, J., & Davis, V. (eds.), Nanotechnology commercialization: Manufacturing processes and products (pp. 1–23). American Institute of Chemical Engineers. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119371762.ch1Google Scholar
Roco, M. C., Harthorn, B., Guston, G., & Shapira, P. (2011). Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13, 3557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011–0454-4Google Scholar
Roig, A. (2018). Nanotechnology governance: From risk regulation to informal platforms. Nanoethics, 12, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-018–0321-1Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (2000). Schumpeter and the endogeneity of technology: Some American perspectives. Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10054185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotolo, D., Hicks, D., & Martin, B. R. (2015). What is an emerging technology?. Research Policy, 44(10), 1827–1843.Google Scholar
Ruttan, V. W. (2006). Is war necessary for economic growth? Military procurement and technology development. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Sabatier, P. C. (1988). Remark on the three-dimensional mixed impedance potential equation. Inverse Problems, 4, 303. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0266–5611/4/1/521Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389.Google Scholar
Saner, M. A., & Marchant, G. E. (2015). Proactive international regulatory cooperation for governance of emerging technologies. Jurimetrics, 55(2), 147–178Google Scholar
Satalkar, P., Elger, B. S., & Shaw, D. M. (2016). Defining nano, nanotechnology and nanomedicine: why should it matter?. Science and engineering ethics, 22(5), 1255–1276.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. C. (1969). Models of segregation. The American Economic Review, 59(2), 488–493.Google Scholar
Schlager, E. (2002). Rationality, cooperation, and common pool resources. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(5), 801–819.Google Scholar
Schlager, E., Blomquist, W., & Tang, S. Y. (1994). Mobile flows, storage, and self-organized institutions for governing common-pool resources. Land Economics, 70(3), 294–317.Google Scholar
Schneider, H. (1999). Participatory governance for poverty reduction. Journal of International Development, 11(4), 521–534.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099–1328(199906)11:4<521::AID-JID599>3.0.CO;2-JGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy (3rd ed.). Harper.Google Scholar
Science Museum of Minnesota. (2019a). About the museum. Science Museum of Minnesota website. www.smm.org/about, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Science Museum of Minnesota. (2019b). Nano. Science Museum of Minnesota website.www.smm.org/exhibitservices/portfolio/nano, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
SIA (Semiconductor Industry Association). (2015). Nanotechnology research key to big semiconductor breakthroughs. SIA (blog), July 16. www.semiconductors.org/nanotechnology-research-key-to-big-semiconductor-breakthroughs/, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
SIA (Semiconductor Industry Association). (2019). Mission. SIA website. www.semiconductors.org/about/mission/, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
SmartState Program. (2019). An Introduction to the SmartState Program. SmartState website. https://smartstatesc.org/introduction, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Soltani, A. M., & Pouypouy, H. (2019). Standardization and regulations of nanotechnology and recent government policies across the world on nanomaterials. Advances in phytonanotechnology (pp. 419–446). Academic Press.Google Scholar
SRC (Semiconductor Research Corporation). (2019a). SRC vision, mission charter and values. SRC website. www.src.org/about/mission/, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
SRC (Semiconductor Research Corporation). (2019b). Nanotechnology [Search results]. SRC website. www.src.org/texis/search/?mode=&opts=&pr=webprod&dropXSL=html&sq=&prox=page&rorder=500&rprox=500&rdfreq=500&rwfreq=50>0&rlead=500&rdepth=0&sufs=1&order=r&query=nanotechnology, accessed April 10, 2019.0&rlead=500&rdepth=0&sufs=1&order=r&query=nanotechnology,+accessed+April+10,+2019.>Google Scholar
Stevenson, G. G. (1991). Common property economics: A general theory and land use applications. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suominen, A., Li, Y., Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of the development of next generation active nanotechnologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 18(9), 270.Google Scholar
Swindell, D., & Rosentraub, M. S. (1998). Who benefits from the presence of professional sports teams? The implications for public funding of stadiums and arenas. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 11–20.Google Scholar
Tang, S. Y. (1991). Institutional arrangements and the management of common-pool resources. Public Administration Review, 51(1), 42–51.Google Scholar
Tassey, G. (2005a). The disaggregated technology production function: A new model of university and corporate research. Research Policy, 34(3), 287–303. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.012Google Scholar
Townsend, R. E. (1995). Fisheries self-governance: Corporate or cooperative structures?. Marine Policy, 19(1), 39–45.Google Scholar
Tsujinaka, Y., Ahmed, S., & Kobashi, Y. (2013). Constructing co-governance between government and civil society: An institutional approach to collaboration. Public Organization Review, 13(4), 411–426. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013–0260-9Google Scholar
Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S., & Aarts, N. (2010). How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society, 15(4). www.jstor.org/stable/26268213Google Scholar
University of California, Santa Barbara. (2019). About CNS-UCSB. CNS-UCSB website. www.cns.ucsb.edu/about.html, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
University of South Carolina. (2019). Center for Environmental Nanoscience and Risk. University of South Carolina website. www.sc.edu/study/colleges_schools/public_health/research/research_centers/center_for_environmental_nanoscience_and_risk/index.php, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
University of Texas. (2019). Guide to the Rice University Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology department records UA 329. Rice University website. https://legacy.lib.utexas.edu/taro/ricewrc/00765/rice-00765.html, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
US Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2019a). About OSHA. OSHA website. www.osha.gov/about.html, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
US Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2019b). Nanotechnology. OSHA website. www.osha.gov/dsg/nanotechnology/nanotech_standards.html, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Wade, R. (1987). The management of common property resources: Collective action as an alternative to privatisation or state regulation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 11(2), 95–106.Google Scholar
Whitford, A. B., & Tucker, J. A. (2009). Technology and the evolution of the regulatory state. Comparative Political Studies, 42(12), 1567–1590. http://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332153Google Scholar
The White House. (2019a). Office of Science and Technology Policy: NSTC. Whitehouse.gov website. www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/nstc/, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
The White House. (2019b). Office of Science and Technology Policy. Whitehouse.gov website. www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., Foley, R. W., Guston, D. H., & Bernstein, M. J. (2016). Broken promises and breaking ground for responsible innovation–intervention research to transform business-as-usual in nanotechnology innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(6), 639–650.Google Scholar
Wiek, A., Zemp, S., Siegrist, M., & Walter, A.I. (2007). Sustainable governance of emerging technologies: Critical constellations in the agent network of nanotechnology. Technology in Society, 29(4), 388–406.Google Scholar
Wilson Center. (2019). Project on emerging nanotechnologies. www.wilsoncenter.org/publication-series/project-emerging-nanotechnologies, accessed April 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Wilson Center. (2016a). The project on emerging nanotechnologies. Nanotech Project website.Google Scholar
Wilson Center. (2016b). Inventories. Nanotech Project website.Google Scholar
Yan Tang, S. (1991). Institutional arrangements and the management of common-pool resources. Public Administration Review, 51(1), 42–51.Google Scholar
Youtie, J., Iacopetta, M., & Graham, S. (2008). Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 315–329.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (2005). Socio-economic impact of nanoscale science: Initial results and nanobank. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. w11181). www.nber.org/papers/w11181Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Integrating Logics in the Governance of Emerging Technologies
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Integrating Logics in the Governance of Emerging Technologies
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Integrating Logics in the Governance of Emerging Technologies
Available formats
×