Postcognitivist Beckett

Olga Beloborodova

doi:10.1017/9781108771108

Series: Elements in Beckett Studies

Postcognitivist Beckett

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2020

Olga Beloborodova

Show author details

Olga Beloborodova: Affiliation:
Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium

Summary

The aim of this Element is to offer a reassessment of Beckett's alleged Cartesianism using the theoretical framework of extended cognition – a cluster of present-day philosophical theories that question the mind's brain-bound nature and see cognition primarily as a process of interaction between the human brain and the environment it operates in. The principal argument defended here is that, despite the Cartesian bias introduced by early Beckett scholarship, Beckett's fictional minds are not isolated 'skullscapes'. Instead, they are grounded in interaction with their fictional storyworlds, however impoverished those may have become in the later part of his writing career.

Element contents

Summary
References

Get access

Keywords

Beckett studies extended cognition postcognitivism fictional minds Cartesian dualism

Type: Element
Information: Series: Elements in Beckett Studies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108771108 [Opens in a new window]

Online ISBN: 9781108771108

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication: 04 June 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, H. Porter (1996), Beckett Writing Beckett: The Author in the Autograph, Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, H. Porter(2013), Real Mysteries: Narrative and the Unknowable, Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Admussen, Richard L. (1979), The Samuel Beckett Manuscripts: A Study, Boston: G. K. Hall.Google Scholar

Banfield, Ann (2003), ‘Beckett’s Tattered Syntax’, Representations, 84:1, pp. 6–29.Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel (1964), Play: A Play in One Act, in Play and Two Short Pieces for Radio. London: Faber and Faber, pp. 9–24.Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel (1965), Proust and Three Dialogues with Georges Duthuit, London: John Calder.Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel (1984), Disjecta, ed. Cohn, Ruby, New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel (1986), The Complete Dramatic Works, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel (2009a), Company, Ill Seen Ill Said, Worstward Ho, Stirrings Still, ed. Hulle, Dirk Van, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel (2009b), Molloy, ed. Weller, Shane, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel (2009c), Murphy, ed. Mays, J. C. C., London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel (2009d), Watt, ed. Ackerley, C. J., London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel (2010a), ‘Dante and the Lobster’, in More Pricks Than Kicks, ed. Nelson, Cassandra, London: Faber and Faber, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel (2010b), Malone Dies, ed. Boxall, Peter, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel (2010c), Texts for Nothing and Other Shorter Prose, 1950–1967, ed. Nixon, Mark, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel (2010d), The Unnamable, ed. Connor, Steven, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Beloborodova, Olga (2018), The ‘Inward Turn’ of Modernism in Samuel Beckett’s Work: A Postcognitivist Reassessment. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar

Ben-Zvi, Linda (1986), Samuel Beckett, Boston: Twaine.Google Scholar

Bernini, Marco (2014), ‘Gression, Regression and Beyond: A Cognitive Reading of The Unnamable’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 26, pp. 193–210.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Peter (1996), Language, Thought and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, David J. (1996), The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chatman, Seymour. 1978. Story and Discourse, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Andy (1997), Being There. Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, Andy and Chalmers, David [1998] (2010), ‘The Extended Mind’, in Menary, Richard (ed.), The Extended Mind, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 27–42.Google Scholar

Cohn, Ruby (1962), Samuel Beckett: The Comic Gamut, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Cohn, Ruby (1965), ‘Philosophical Fragments in the Works of Samuel Beckett’, in Esslin, Martin (ed.), Samuel Beckett: A Collection of Critical Essays, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, pp. 169–177.Google Scholar

Cohn, Ruby (1980), Just Play, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cohn, Ruby, Van Duyn, Mona, Thurston, Jarvis, and Hartman, Carl (eds.) (1959), Perspective: A Quarterly of Literature and the Arts, 11:3.Google Scholar

Craig, George Dow Fehsenfeld, Martha, Gunn, Dan, and More Overbeck, Lois (2011), The Letters of Samuel Beckett, vol. II, 1941–1956, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel (1993), Consciousness Explained, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Di Paolo, Ezequiel A., Rohde, Marieke, and De Jaegher, Hanne (2010), ‘Horizons for the Enactive Mind: Values, Social Interaction, and Play’, in Stewart, John, Gapenne, Olivier, and Di Paolo, Ezequiel A. (eds), Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 33–87.Google Scholar

Dow Fehsenfeld, Martha and More Overbeck, Lois (eds) (2009), The Letters of Samuel Beckett, vol. I, 1929–1940, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Esslin, Martin (ed.) (1965), Samuel Beckett: A Collection of Critical Essays, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Esslin, Martin (1986), ‘Samuel Beckett and the Art of Radio’, in Gontarski, S. E. (ed.), On Beckett: Essays and Criticism, New York: Grove Press, pp. 360–84.Google Scholar

Feldman, Matthew (2006), Beckett’s Books: A Cultural History of Samuel Beckett’s ‘Interwar’ Notes, New York/London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Feldman, Matthew, and Mamdani, Karim (eds.) (2015), Beckett / Philosophy, Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag.Google Scholar

Fifield, Peter (2015), ‘“Of being – and remaining”: Beckett’s Early Greek Philosophy’, in Feldman, Matthew and Mamdani, Karim (eds.), Beckett / Philosophy, Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag, pp. 127–50.Google Scholar

Fletcher, John (1964), The Novels of Samuel Beckett, London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar

Fletcher, John and Spurling, John (1972), Beckett. A Study of his Plays, London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Gauker, Christopher (1990), ‘How to learn a language like a chimpanzee’, Philosophical Psychology, 3:1, pp. 31–53.Google Scholar

Gontarski, S. E. (1985), The Intent of Undoing in Samuel Beckett’s Dramatic Texts, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alice, and Hamilton, Kenneth (1976), ‘The Guffaw of the Abderite: Samuel Beckett’s Use of Democritus’, Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 9:2, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Herman, David (2011), ‘Re-minding Modernism’, in Herman, David, (ed.), The Emergence of Mind. Representations of Consciousness in Narrative Discourse in English, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 243–72.Google Scholar

Hesla, David (1971), The Shape of Chaos: An Interpretation of the Art of Samuel Beckett, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Hutto, Daniel D. and Myin, Erik (2013), Radicalizing Enactivism. Basic Minds without Content, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

James, William [1904] (1996), ‘Does “Consciousness” Exist?’, in Taylor, Eugene and Wozniak, Robert (eds.), Pure Experience. The Responses to William James, Bristol: Thoemmes Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Katz, Daniel (1999), ‘Saying I no more’: Subjectivity and Consciousness in the Prose of Samuel Beckett, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Kenner, Hugh (1961), Samuel Beckett: A Critical Study, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Knowlson, James (1996), Damned to Fame. The Life of Samuel Beckett, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Kroll, Jeri (1977), ‘The Surd as Inadmissible Evidence: The Case of Attorney General v. Henry McCabe’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 2, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar

Lane, Richard (ed.) (2002), Beckett and Philosophy, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Maude, Ulrika (2009), Beckett, Technology and the Body, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Menary, Richard (2007), ‘Writing as Thinking’, Language Sciences, 29:5, pp. 621–32.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice [1945] (1962), Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mintz, Samuel (1959), ‘Beckett’s Murphy: A Cartesian Novel’, Perspective: A Quarterly of Literature and the Arts, 11:3, pp. 156–65.Google Scholar

Mooney, Michael E. (1982), ‘Presocratic Scepticism: Samuel Beckett’s Murphy Reconsidered’, ELH [English Literary History], 49:1, pp. 214–34.Google Scholar

Moran, Dermot (2006), ‘Beckett and Philosophy’, in Murray, Christopher (ed.), Samuel Beckett: 100 Years: Centenary Essays, Dublin: New Island Publishers, pp. 93–109.Google Scholar

Morot-Sir, Edouard (1976), ‘Samuel Beckett and Cartesian Emblems’, in Morot-Sir, Edouard, Harper, Howard, and McMillan III, Dougald (eds.), Samuel Beckett and the Art of Rhetoric, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Department of Romance Languages, pp. 25–104.Google Scholar

Norman, Donald (1993), Things that Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine, Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

O’Reilly, Édouard Magessa, Dirk Van Hulle, and Pim Verhulst, (2017), The Making of Samuel Beckett’s ‘Molloy’, Brussels and London: University Press Antwerp and Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Pattie, David (2000), Samuel Beckett, London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pilling, John (1999), Beckett’s ‘Dream’ Notebook, Reading: Beckett International Foundation.Google Scholar

Pilling, John (2011), Samuel Beckett’s ‘More Pricks Than Kicks’: In A Strait Of Two Wills, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Pothast, Ulrich (2008), The Metaphysical Vision: Arthur Schopenhauer’s Philosophy of Art and Life and Samuel Beckett’s Own Way to Make Use of It, New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Pountney, Rosemary (1988), Theatre of Shadows: Samuel Beckett’s Drama 1956–1976, Gerrards Cross: Colin Smythe.Google Scholar

Rodaway, Paul (1994), Sensuous Geographies: Body, Sense, and Place, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rowlands, Mark (2010), The New Science of the Mind, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rowlands, Mark (2015), ‘Consciousness Unbound’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22:3–4, pp. 34–51.Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert [1949] (2000), The Concept of Mind, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Salisbury, Laura (2008), ‘“What Is the Word”: Beckett’s Aphasic Modernism’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 17: 1–2, pp. 78–126.Google Scholar

Scruton, Roger (1983), ‘Beckett and the Cartesian Soul’, in The Aesthetic Understanding: Essays in the Philosophy of Art and Culture, London/New York: Methuen, pp. 222–41.Google Scholar

Shainberg, Lawrence (1987), ‘Exorcising Beckett’, The Paris Review, 29:104, pp. 100–36.Google Scholar

Sheehan, Paul (2017), ‘Scenes of Writing: Beckett and the Technology of Inscription’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 29:1, pp. 138–49.Google Scholar

Stewart, John (2010), ‘Foundational Issues in Enaction as a Paradigm for Cognitive Science’, in Stewart, John, Gapenne, Olivier, and Di Paolo, Ezequiel A. (eds.), Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Tajiri, Yoshiki (2007), Samuel Beckett and the Prosthetic Body, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Tucker, David (2012), Samuel Beckett and Arnold Geulincx, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Van Hulle, Dirk (2012), ‘The Extended Mind and Multiple Drafts: Beckett’s Models of the Mind and the Postcognitivist Paradigm’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 24:1, pp. 277–90.Google Scholar

Van Hulle, Dirk (2014a), Modern Manuscripts. The Extended Mind and Creative Undoing from Darwin to Beckett and Beyond, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Van Hulle, Dirk (2014b), ‘The Obidil and the Man of Glass’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 26:1, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar

Van Hulle, Dirk (2018), ‘Authors’ Libraries and the Extended Mind: The Case of Joyce’s Books’, in Belluc, Sylvain and Benejam, Valerie (eds.), Cognitive Joyce, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar

Van Hulle, Dirk, and Nixon, Mark (2013), Samuel Beckett’s Library, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van Hulle, Dirk, and Verhulst, Pim (2017), The Making of Samuel Beckett’s ‘Malone meurt’/‘Malone Dies’, Brussels and London: University Press Antwerp and Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Van Hulle, Dirk, and Weller, Shane (2014), The Making of Samuel Beckett’s ‘L’Innommable’/‘The Unnamable’, Brussels and London: University Press Antwerp and Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan, and Rosch, Eleonor (1991), The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Weller, Shane (2018), ‘From Language Revolution to Literature of the Unword: Beckett as Late Modernist’, in Beloborodova, Olga, Van Hulle, Dirk, and Verhulst, Pim (eds.), Beckett and Modernism, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 37–52.Google Scholar

Woolf, Virginia [1917] (2000), ‘The Mark on the Wall’, in Selected Short Stories, London: Penguin Modern Classics.Google Scholar

Worth, Katherine (1981), ‘Beckett and the Radio Medium’, in Drakakis, John (ed.), British Radio Drama, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 191–217.Google Scholar

Zilliacus, Clas (1976), Beckett and Broadcasting: A Study of the Works of Samuel Beckett for and in Radio and Television, Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar

Element contents

Postcognitivist Beckett

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save element to Kindle

Save element to Dropbox

Save element to Google Drive