Element contents
Series: Elements in American Politics
Why Bad Policies Spread (and Good Ones Don't)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2021
Summary
Building on a deep theoretical foundation and drawing on numerous examples, we examine how policies spread across the American states. We argue that for good policies to spread while bad policies are pushed aside, states must learn from one another. The three ingredients for this positive outcome are observable experiments, time to learn, and favorable incentives and expertise among policymakers. Although these ingredients are sometimes plentiful, we also note causes for concern, such as when policies are complex or incompatible with current practices, when policymakers give in to underlying political biases, or when political institutions lack the capacity for cultivating expertise. Under such conditions, states may rely on competition, imitation, and coercion, rather than learning, which can allow bad policies, rather than good ones, to spread. We conclude with lessons for reformers and policymakers and an assessment of our overall argument based on state responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in American PoliticsOnline ISBN: 9781108956123Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 23 September 2021
References
Adolph, Christopher, Amano, Kenya, Bang-Jensen, Bree, Fullman, Nancy, and Wilkerson, John. 2021. Pandemic politics: Timing state-level social distancing responses to COVID-19. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 46(2): 211–233.Google Scholar
Alciati, Marianne H., Marcy Frosh, Sylvan B. Green, Ross C. Brownson, Peter H. Fisher, Robin Hobart, Adele Roman, Russell C. Sciandra, and Shelton, Dana M.. 1998. State laws on youth access to tobacco in the United States: Measuring their extensiveness with a new rating system. Tobacco Control 7: 345–352.Google Scholar
Anderson, Sarah E., DeLeo, Rob A., and Taylor, Kristin. 2020. Policy entrepreneurs, legislators, and agenda setting: Information and influence. Policy Studies Journal 48(3): 587–611.Google Scholar
Bailey, Michael A., and Rom, Mark C.. 2004. A wider race? Interstate competition across health and welfare programs. Journal of Politics 66(2): 326–347.Google Scholar
Bednar, Jenna. 2015. The Resilience of the American Federal System. In Tushnet, Mark, Graber, Mark A., and Levinson, Sanford, eds., pp. 283–302, The Oxford Handbook of the US Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William D.. 1990. State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review 84(2): 395–415.Google Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William D.. 1992. Tax innovation in the states: Capitalizing on political opportunity. American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 715–742.Google Scholar
Billard, Côme, Creti, Anna, and Mandel, Antoine. 2020. How environmental policies spread: A network approach to diffusion in the U.S. FAERE Working Paper, 2020.12.Google Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J., and Skinner, Paul. 2012. State policy innovativeness revisited. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 12(3): 303–329.Google Scholar
Bouché, Vanessa, and Volden, Craig. 2011. Privatization and the diffusion of innovations. Journal of Politics 73(2): 428–442.Google Scholar
Boushey, Graeme. 2010. Policy Diffusion Dynamics in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bramson, Heidi, Des Jarlais, Don C., Arasteh, Kamyar, Nugent, Ann, Guardino, Vivian, Feelemyer, Jonathan, and Hodel, Derek. 2015. State laws, syringe exchange, and HIV among persons who inject drugs in the United States: History and effectiveness. Journal of Public Health Policy 36(2): 212–230.Google Scholar
Brandeis, Louis Dembitz. 1932. Dissenting opinion. New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 US 262, 311.Google Scholar
Bricker, Christine, and Scott, LaCombe. 2021. The ties that bind us: The influence of perceived state similarity on policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly 74(2): 377–387.Google Scholar
Bromley-Trujillo, Rebecca, and Karch, Andrew. 2019. Salience, scientific uncertainty, and the agenda-setting power of science. Policy Studies Journal. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/psj.12373.Google Scholar
Bucchianeri, Peter, Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan E.. 2020. Legislative effectiveness in the American states. Working paper: Center for Effective Lawmaking, https://thelawmakers.orgGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., Craig Volden, Adam M. Dynes, and Shor, Boris. 2017. Ideology, learning, and policy diffusion: Experimental evidence. American Journal of Political Science 61(1): 37–49.Google Scholar
Callander, Steven. 2011. Searching for good policies. American Political Science Review 105(4): 643–662.Google Scholar
Cammisa, Anne Marie. 1995. Governments as Interest Groups: Intergovernmental Lobbying and the Federal System. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
McCann, Clouser, Pamela, J., and Shipan, Charles R.. How many major laws delegate to federal agencies? (Almost) all of them. Political Science Research and Methods. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
McCann, Clouser, Pamela, J., Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2015. Top-down federalism: State policy responses to national government discussions. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 45(4): 495–525.Google Scholar
Enns, Peter K. 2014. The public’s increasing punitiveness and its influence on mass incarceration in the United States. American Journal of Political Science 58(4): 857–872.Google Scholar
Eshbaugh-Soha, Matthew. 2006. The conditioning effects of policy salience and complexity on American political institutions. Policy Studies Journal 34(2): 223–243.Google Scholar
Fay, Daniel L., and Wenger, Jeffrey B.. 2016. The political structure of policy diffusion. Policy Studies Journal 44(3): 349–365.Google Scholar
Frean, Molly, Gruber, Jonathan, and Sommers, Benjamin D.. 2017. Premium subsidies, the mandate, and Medicaid expansion: Coverage effects of the Affordable Care Act. Journal of Health Economics 53: 72–86.Google Scholar
Füglister, Katharina. 2012. Where does learning take place? The role of intergovernmental cooperation in policy diffusion. European Journal of Political Research 51(3): 316–349.Google Scholar
Garrett, Kristin N., and Jansa, Joshua M.. 2015. Interest group influence in policy diffusion networks. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 15(3): 387–417.Google Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio, Shipan, Charles R., and Bruno, Wüest. 2021. Policy diffusion: The issue definition stage. American Journal of Political Science 65(1): 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average citizens. Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1990. Organization of informative committees by a rational legislature. American Journal of Political Science 34(2): 531–564.Google Scholar
Glick, David M. 2012. Learning by mimicking and modifying: A model of policy knowledge diffusion with evidence from legal implementation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 30(2): 339–370.Google Scholar
Glick, Henry R., and Hays, Scott P.. 1991. Innovation and reinvention in state policymaking: Theory and the evolution of living will laws. Journal of Politics 53(3): 835–850.Google Scholar
Graham, Erin R., Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2013. The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science. British Journal of Political Science 43(3): 673–701.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia. 1973. Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review 67(4): 1174–1185.Google Scholar
Grossback, Lawrence J., Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Peterson, David A.. 2004. Ideology and learning in policy diffusion. American Politics Research 67(4): 521–545.Google Scholar
Hall, Andrew B. 2019. Who Wants to Run? How the Devaluing of Political Office Drives Polarization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Oliver, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W.. 1997. The proper scope of government: Theory and an application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4): 1127–1161.Google Scholar
Huber, John D., and Shipan, Charles R.. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jansa, Joshua M., Hansen, Eric R., and Gray, Virginia H.. 2019. Copy and paste lawmaking: Legislative professionalism and policy reinvention in the states. American Politics Research 47(4): 739–767.Google Scholar
Karch, Andrew. 2007. Democratic Laboratories: Policy Diffusion Among the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Karch, Andrew. 2012. Vertical diffusion and the policy-making process: The politics of embryonic stem cell research. Political Research Quarterly 65(1): 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karch, Andrew, and Cravens, Matthew. 2014. Rapid diffusion and policy reform: The adoption and modification of three strikes laws. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 14(4): 461–491.Google Scholar
Karch, Andrew, Nicholson-Crotty, Sean C., Woods, Neal D., and Bowman, Ann O’M. 2016. Policy diffusion and the pro-innovation bias. Political Research Quarterly 69(1): 83–95.Google Scholar
Kingdon, John. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kollman, Ken, Miller, John H., and Page, Scott E.. 2000. Decentralization and the search for policy solutions. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 16(1): 102–128.Google Scholar
Koski, Chris. 2010. Greening America’s skylines: The diffusion of low-salience policies. Policy Studies Journal 38(1): 93–117.Google Scholar
Kruzel, John. 2020. Doctor behind “flatten the curve” urges bipartisan response to outbreak. The Hill, March 20. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/488559-doctor-behind-flatten-the-curve-urges-bipartisan-response-to-outbreakGoogle Scholar
LaCombe, Scott, and Boehmke, Frederick J.. 2020. Evaluating Approaches for Modeling Learning within Diffusion Episodes. Sage Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science and International Relations, eds. Carini, Luigi and Franzese, Robert, pp. 311–328. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001. Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science 45(4): 951–971.Google Scholar
Leiser, Stephanie. 2017. The diffusion of state tax incentives for business. Public Finance Review 45(3): 334–363.Google Scholar
Linder, Fridolin, Desmarais, Bruce, Burgess, Matthew, and Giraudy, Eugenia. 2020. Text as policy: Measuring policy similarity through bill text reuse. Policy Studies Journal 48(2): 546–574.Google Scholar
Maggetti, Martino, and Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2016. Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms. Journal of Public Policy 36(1): 87–107.Google Scholar
Makse, Todd, and Volden, Craig. 2011. The role of policy attributes in the diffusion of innovations. Journal of Politics 73(1): 108–124.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Daniel J. 2016. Building a better speed trap: Measuring policy adoption speed in the American states. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 16(1): 98–120.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Daniel J. 2021. Who are your neighbors? The role of ideology and decline of geographic proximity in the diffusion of policy innovations. Policy Studies Journal 49(1): 67–88.Google Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest. 1998. Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McConnell, Allan. 2010. Policy success, policy failure, and grey areas in-between. Journal of Public Policy 30(3): 345–362.Google Scholar
Meseguer, Covadonga. 2006. Rational learning and bounded learning in the diffusion of policy innovations. Rationality and Society 18(1): 35–66.Google Scholar
Miler, Kristina C. 2010. Constituency Representation in Congress: The View from Capitol Hill. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael. 1997. Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 738–770.Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael. 2019. So you want to be a policy entrepreneur? Policy Design and Practice 2(4): 307–323.Google Scholar
Mintrom, Michael, and Vergari, Sandra. 1998. Policy networks and innovation diffusion: The case of state education reforms. Journal of Politics 60(1): 126–148.Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z. 2001. Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Political Research Quarterly 54(1): 103–124.Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z. 2020. The Study of U.S. State Policy Diffusion: What Hath Walker Wrought? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Sean. 2009. The politics of diffusion: Public policy in the American states. Journal of Politics 71(1): 192–205.Google Scholar
Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Carley, Sanya. 2016. Effectiveness, implementation, and policy diffusion: Or “Can we make that work for us?” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 16(1): 78–97.Google Scholar
Noll, Roger G., and Zimbalist, Andrew. 2011. Sports, Jobs, and Taxes: The Economic Impact of Sports Teams and Stadiums. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Oates, Wallace E. 1999. An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature 37(3): 1120–1149.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Julianna. 2012. The social contagion model: Exploring the role of public opinion on the diffusion of anti-smoking legislation across the American states. Journal of Politics 74(1): 187–202.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Julianna, and Maltby, Elizabeth. 2017. The role of public opinion – does it influence the diffusion of ACA decisions? Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law 42(2): 309–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, Scott E. 2008. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Parinandi, Srinivas. 2020. Policy inventing and borrowing among state legislatures. American Journal of Political Science 64(4): 852–868.Google Scholar
Peterson, Paul E., and Rom, Mark C.. 1990. Welfare Magnets: A New Case for a National Standard. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Posner, Paul L. 1998. The Politics of Unfunded Mandates: Whither Federalism? Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett. 2003. The Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Schram, Sanford F., and Soss, Joe. 2001. Success stories: Welfare reform, policy discourse, and the politics of research. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 577(1): 49–65.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Joanna M. 2002. Police, prosecutors, criminals, and determinate sentencing: The truth about truth-in-sentencing laws. The Journal of Law and Economics 45(2): 509–533.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2006. Bottom-up federalism: The diffusion of antismoking policies from U.S. cities to states. American Journal of Political Science 50(4): 825–843.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2008. The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 840–857.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2014. When the smoke clears: Expertise, learning, and policy diffusion. Journal of Public Policy 34(3): 357–387.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1947. Administrative Behavior, A Story of Decision Processes in Business Organization. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2007. Measuring state legislative professionalism: The Squire Index revisited. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7(2): 211–227.Google Scholar
Stemen, Don, and Rengifo, Andres F.. 2011. Policies and imprisonment: The impact of structured sentencing and determinate sentencing on state incarceration rates, 1978–2004. Justice Quarterly 28(1): 174–201.Google Scholar
Tiebout, Charles M. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64(5): 416–424.Google Scholar
Trounstine, Jessica. 2018. Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1973. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 5(2): 207–232.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2002. The politics of competitive federalism: A race to the bottom in welfare benefits? American Journal of Political Science 46(2): 352–363.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2006. States as policy laboratories: Emulating success in the Children’s Health Insurance Program. American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 294–312.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2016. Failures: Diffusion, learning, and policy abandonment. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 16(1): 44–77.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1969. The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review 63(3): 880–899.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt G. 2005. Theories of policy diffusion: Lessons from Latin American pension reform. World Politics 57(2): 262–295.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt G. 2007. Bounded Rationality and Policy Diffusion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilde, James A. 1971. Grants-in-aid: The analytics of design and response. National Tax Journal 24(2): 143–155.Google Scholar
Willison, Charley. 2021. Ungoverned and Out of Sight: Public Health and the Political Crisis of Homelessness in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, Alan E., and Ellig, Jerry. 2007. The politics of wine: Trade barriers, interest groups, and the Commerce Clause. Journal of Politics 69(3): 859–875.Google Scholar
Yu, Jinhai, Jennings, Edward T., and Butler, J. S.. 2020. Lobbying, learning, and policy reinvention: An examination of the American states’ drunk driving laws. Journal of Public Policy 40(2): 259–279.Google Scholar
- 16
- Cited by