Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:10:43.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of a Calibration Method for Quantitative X-ray Powder Diffraction of Size-Segregated Aerosols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Robert D. Giauque ,
Joseph M. Jaklevic  and
Linda E. Sindelar
Robert D. Giauque
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California Berkeley, CA 94720
Joseph M. Jaklevic
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California Berkeley, CA 94720
Linda E. Sindelar
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory University of California Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Extract

X-ray powder diffraction (XPD) is an important tool for the chemical characterization of atmospheric aerosol samples particularly when combined with elemental analysis obtained from X-ray fluorescence (XRF) measurements of the same specimen. Aerosol samples obtained in typical monitoring studies consist of thin, uniform deposits of particles corresponding to a known size distribution with aerodynamic equivalent diameters of less than 10 microns.This is an ideal form for X-ray fluorescence analysis since absorption and matrix enhancement effects are minimized. However, the ability to perform quantitative X-ray powder diffraction without the use of internal standards is restricted by several factors which affect the linearity of response between diffracted intensity and sample concentration. In addition to the normal photoelectric absorption due to passage of the X-rays through the sample, XPD intensities can be affected by primary and secondary extinction due to diffraction of the incident beam, particle size effects and preferred orientation of particles.

Type
VIII. Qualitative and Quantiative Phase Analysis by XRD
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 34: Thirty-Ninth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, July 30 - August 3, 1990 , 1990 , pp. 395 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dzubay, T. C. and Stevens, R. K., Sampling and Analysis Methods for Ambient PM-10 Aerosol, to be published in “Receptor Modeling in Air Quality Management,” P. K. Hopke, ed., Elsevier Science Publishers, New YorK.Google Scholar
2. Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L. E., “X-Ray Diffraction Procedures,” John Wiley & Sons, New York, 139 (1974).Google Scholar
3. Cline, J. P. and Snyder, R. L., The Dramatic Effect of Crystallite Size on X-ray Intensities, in “Advances in X-Ray Analysis,” C. R. Hubbard, C. S. Barrett, P. K. Predecki and D. E. Leyden, eds., Plenum Publishing, New York, 26: 111–117 (1983).10.1154/S0376030800012362Google Scholar
4. Cline, J. P. and Snyder, R. L., Sample Characteristics Affecting Quantitative Analysis by X-ray Powder Diffraction, Mater. Sci. Res., (Adv. Mater. Charact. 2), 19: 131 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Cline, J. P. and Snyder, R. L., The Effects of Extinction on X— ray Powder Diffraction Intensities, in “Advances in X-Ray Analysis,” C. S. Barrett, J. V. Gilfrich, R. Jenkins, D. E. Leyden, J. C. Russ and P. K. Predecki, eds., Plenum Publishing, New York, 30: 447–456 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Nakairmra, T., Quantitative Determination by X-ray Diffractometry of Calcium Sulfate and Calcium Carbonate, Powder Diff., 3(2) :86 (1988).Google Scholar
7. Kohyama, N., A New X-ray Diffraction Method for the Quantitative Analysis of Free Silica in the Airborne Dust in Working Environment, Ind. Health. 23(3):221 (1985).10.2486/indhealth.23.221Google Scholar
8. Smith, S. T., Snyder, R. L. and Brownell, W. E., Minimization of Preferred Orientation in Powders by Spray Drying, in “Advances in X-Ray Analysis,” G. J. McCarthy, C. S. Barrett, D. E. Leyden, J. B. Newkirk and C. O. Rudd, eds., Plenum Publishing, New York, 22: 77–87 (1979).10.1154/S0376030800016426Google Scholar
9. O'Connor, B. H. and Jaklevic, J. M., X-ray Diffractometry of Airborne Particulates Deposited on Membrane Filters, X-Ray Spect., 9(2):60 (1980).10.1002/xrs.1300090207Google Scholar
10. Davis, B. L., and Johnson, L. R., On the Use of Various Filter Substrates for Quantitative Particulate Analysis by X-ray Diffraction, Atmos. Environ., 16(2):273 (1982).10.1016/0004-6981(82)90443-7Google Scholar
11. Jaklevic, J. M., Goulding, F. S., Jarrett, B. V. and Meng, J. M., Application of X-ray Fluorescence Techniques to Measure Elemental Composition of Particles in the Atmosphere, in “Analytical Methods Applied to Air Pollution Measurements, “ R. K. Stevens and W. F. Herget, eds., Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, 123 (1974).Google Scholar
12. McMaster, W. H., Del Grande, N. K., Mallett, J. H. and Hubbell, J. H., Compilation of X-Ray Cross Sections, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Report UCRL-50174, Section II, Revision 1 (1969).Google Scholar
13. Thompson, A. C., Jaklevic, J. M., O'Connor, B. H. and Morris, C. M., X-ray Powder Diffraction System for Chemical Speciation of Particulate Aerosol Samples, Nucl. Inst. Meth., 198: 539 (1982).10.1016/0167-5087(82)90297-6Google Scholar