Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:29:05.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘ZIMBABWEANS ARE FOOLISHLY LITIGIOUS’: EXPLORING THE LOGIC OF APPEALS TO A POLITICIZED LEGAL SYSTEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2016

Susanne Verheul
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I focus on the narratives of two men, Patrick and Father Marko Mkandla. I ask whether their continued interactions with, and appeals to, Zimbabwe's politicized legal system were ‘foolish’. The two men inhabited different geographic regions and diverged in their economic positions, political engagement, and ties to Zimbabwe's human rights networks. They nonetheless both started their accounts by recollecting that they persisted in reporting cases of political violence to the Zimbabwe Republic Police. Their accounts show us that imagining, invoking and interacting with the law in Zimbabwe was often an ambiguous, occasionally dangerous, and very contradictory exercise. Under ZANU-PF's rule, judicial institutions were increasingly politicized as instruments for repression. The men nevertheless continued to interact with the state and its officials as if these were bound by rules. This allowed Patrick and Father Mkandla to perform their rights-based citizenship, to experience occasional ‘successes’, and to differentiate themselves from the ‘unprofessional’ politicized civil servants they encountered during their appeals. Rather than ‘foolishly’ invoking the law, some Zimbabwean citizens engaged it as a shared language through which they could articulate their imagination of, hopes for, and belonging to a rule-bound state in the future.

Résumé

Cet article s'intéresse aux récits de deux hommes, Patrick et le prêtre Marko Mkandla. Il se demande si leurs interactions persistantes avec le système juridique politisé du Zimbabwe, et leurs appels auprès de celui-ci, étaient menées « bêtement ». Les deux hommes vivaient dans des régions géographiques différentes et présentaient des divergences en termes de situation économique, d'engagement public et de liens avec les réseaux des droits de l'homme au Zimbabwe. Tous deux ont néanmoins commencé leurs récits en remémorant leur persistance à déclarer des cas de violence politique à la police de la République du Zimbabwe. Ces récits nous montrent que l'acte d'imaginer, d'invoquer et d'interagir avec la loi au Zimbabwe était souvent un exercice ambigu, occasionnellement dangereux, et très contradictoire. Sous le régime de la ZANU-PF, les institutions judiciaires étaient de plus en plus politisées en tant qu'instruments de répression. Les deux hommes ont néanmoins continué à interagir avec l’État et ses agents comme si ceux-ci étaient tenus au respect de règles. Ceci a permis à Patrick et au prêtre Mkandla d'exercer leur citoyenneté sur la base de droits, de connaître des « succès » occasionnels et de se démarquer des fonctionnaires politisés « peu professionnels » qu'ils ont rencontrés à l'occasion de leurs appels. Plutôt que d'invoquer « bêtement » la loi, certains citoyens zimbabwéens s'en sont servis comme langage commun par lequel ils ont pu exprimer leur imagination, leurs espoirs et leur appartenance à ce qui serait à l'avenir un État tenu à des règles.

Type
Law and Social Order in Africa
Information
Africa , Volume 86 , Issue 1 , February 2016 , pp. 78 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © International African Institute 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, J. (2010) ‘The political imaginaries and social lives of political prisoners in post-2000 Zimbabwe’, Journal of Southern African Studies 36 (2): 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J. (2011a) ‘Nationalism and self-government in Rhodesian detention: Gonakudzingwa, 1964–1974’, Journal of Southern African Studies 37 (3): 551–69.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. (2011b) ‘Rethinking the state and political opposition through the prism of the prison’, Critical African Studies 4 (6): 69–83.Google Scholar
Alexander, J., McGregor, J. and Ranger, T. (2000) Violence and Memory: one hundred years in the ‘dark forests’ of Matabeleland. Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
BHRC (2008) ‘A Place in the Sun’, Zimbabwe: a report of the state of the rule of law in Zimbabwe after the Global Political Agreement of September 2008. London: Bar Human Rights Committee (BHRC).Google Scholar
CCJP and LRF (1997) Report on the 1980s Disturbances in Matabeleland and the Midlands. Harare: Catholic Commission for Justice and Peace (CCJP) and Legal Resources Foundation (LRF).Google Scholar
Chanock, M. (1985) Law, Custom and Social Order: the colonial experience in Malawi and Zambia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chanock, M. (2001) The Making of South African Legal Culture, 1902–1936: fear, favour and prejudice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, J. L. (2001) ‘Colonialism, culture and the law: a foreword’, Law and Social Inquiry 26 (2): 305–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk Moore, S. (1986) Social Facts and Fabrications: customary law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Falk Moore, S. (1998) ‘Systematic judicial and extra-judicial injustice: preparations for future accountability’ in Werbner, R. P. (ed.) Memory and the Postcolony: African anthropology and the critique of power. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Government of Zimbabwe (2005) Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act. Harare: Government Printer.Google Scholar
HRW (2008a) ‘Bullets for Each of You’: state sponsored violence since Zimbabwe's March 29 elections. New York NY: Human Rights Watch (HRW).Google Scholar
HRW (2008b) ‘They Beat Me like a Dog’: political persecution of opposition activists and supporters in Zimbabwe. New York NY: Human Rights Watch (HRW).Google Scholar
HRW (2008c) ‘Our Hands are Tied’: erosion of the rule of law in Zimbabwe. New York NY: Human Rights Watch (HRW).Google Scholar
IBA (2001) Report of IBA Zimbabwe Mission 2001. London: International Bar Association (IBA).Google Scholar
Lazarus-Black, M. and Hirsch, S. F. (eds) (1994) Contested States: law, hegemony, and resistance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mann, K. and Roberts, R. (eds) (1991) Law in Colonial Africa. London: James Currey.Google Scholar
Merry, S. E. (1986) ‘Everyday understandings of the law in working-class America’, American Ethnologist 13 (2): 253–70.Google Scholar
Merry, S. E. (1988) ‘Legal pluralism’, Law and Society Review 22 (5): 869–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, S. E. (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: legal consciousness among working-class Americans. Chicago IL and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moustafa, T. and Ginsburg, T. (eds) (2008) Rule by Law: the politics of courts in authoritarian regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
PTUZ (2011) Every School Has a Story to Tell: a study into teacher's experiences with elections in Zimbabwe. Harare: Progressive Teachers Union Zimbabwe (PTUZ).Google Scholar
PTUZ and RAU (2012) Political Violence and Intimidation Against Teachers in Zimbabwe. Harare: Progressive Teachers Union Zimbabwe (PTUZ) and Research and Advocacy Unit (RAU).Google Scholar
SPT (2005) ‘Subverting Justice’: the role of the judiciary in denying the will of the Zimbabwean electorate since 2000. Johannesburg: Solidarity Peace Trust (SPT).Google Scholar
SPT (2006) ‘Policing the State’: an evaluation of 1,981 political arrests in Zimbabwe 2000–2005. Johannesburg: Institute of Justice and Reconciliation and Solidarity Peace Trust (SPT).Google Scholar
Sundar, N. (2011) ‘The rule of law and citizenship in central India: post-colonial dilemmas’, Citizenship Studies 15 (3–4): 419–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E. P. (1975) Whigs and Hunters: the origin of the Black Act. New York NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Verheul, S. (2013) ‘“Rebels” and “good boys”: patronage, intimidation and resistance in Zimbabwe's Attorney General's Office after 2000’, Journal of Southern African Studies 39 (4): 765–82.Google Scholar
Werbner, R. P. (1998) ‘Smoke from the barrel of a gun: postwars of the dead, memory and reinscription in Zimbabwe’ in Werbner, R. P. (ed.) Memory and the Postcolony: African anthropology and the critique of power. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum (2002) Teaching Them a Lesson: a report on the attack on Zimbabwean teachers. Harare: Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum.Google Scholar
Zimudzi, T. B. (2004) ‘African women, violent crime and the criminal law in colonial Zimbabwe, 1900–1952’, Journal of Southern African Studies 30 (3): 499–517.Google Scholar