Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:16:37.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Words Cannot be Found: German Colonial Rule in Namibia. An Annotated Reprint of the 1918 Blue Book, by Jeremy Silvester and Jan-Bart Gewald. Sources for African History vol. 1. Leiden, Brill, 2003, xxxvii, 366 pp. ISBN 9004129812. _49/US $49.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2022

Marion Wallace*
Affiliation:
British Library
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © African Research & Documentation 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The first of these reports is Union of South Africa, Report on the Natives of South-West Africa and their Treatment by Germany HMSO, London, 1918; Cd 9146). The second (see also n. 23p. xvii) is Great Britain, Correspondence relating to the Wishes of the Natives of the German Colonies as to their Future Government (HMSO, London, 1918; Parliamentary Papers XVII, 17, Cd 9210).

2 See, for example, Jürgen Zimmerer, “Krieg, KZ und Völkermord in Südwestafrika: Der erste deutsche Genozid” in Jürgen Zimmerer and Joachim Zeller (eds), Völkermord in Duetsch- Südwestafrika: Der Kolonialkreig (1904-1908) in Namibia und seine Folgen (Berlin, Links, 2003), pp. 45-63. Note that the argument that genocide occurred in Namibia does not rest solely or mainly on the evidence of the Blue Book.

3 Item no. 6 (pp. 7-10) of this command paper is a telegram, dated 15 Feb 1918, from the governorgeneral of South Africa concerning the future of SWA; item no. 7 (pp. 10-21) is a longer report from him on the same subject, dated 9 Feb 1918 and quoting the opinions of African leaders in Namibia.

4 The editors attempt to deflect criticism of this republication as anti-German: “Colonialism and colonial rule, be it that of Germany, Great Britain, The Netherlands, or any other colonising power, was fundamentally cruel, unjust, and disrespective [sic] of fundamental human rights.” (p. xxix)

5 For example, Colonial Office files contain statements from mine labourers forced into service by the Boers after the mines had closed. TNA, CO 179/207, Natal, original correspondence, Governor's despatches, 10 and 29 Nov 1899.