Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T06:31:10.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of family formation on the build-up of pension rights among minority ethnic groups and native women in Belgium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

KAREL NEELS*
Affiliation:
Centre for Longitudinal & Life Course Studies, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
DAVID DE WACHTER
Affiliation:
Centre for Longitudinal & Life Course Studies, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
HANS PEETERS
Affiliation:
Federal Planning Bureau (this article was written during a previous employment at the Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven).
*
Address for correspondence: Karel Neels, Centre for Longitudinal & Life Course Studies, University of Antwerp, Sint Jacobstraat 2, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium E-mail: Karel.Neels@uantwerpen.be

Abstract

Gender penalties in pension outcomes are widely acknowledged and have been documented for majority populations in various settings. A recurring finding is that the gendered impact of family formation on work–care trajectories adversely affects women's accumulation of pension rights over the lifecourse relative to men. Although maternal employment is particularly low in migrant populations, few papers have explicitly addressed pension protection of migrant women. Using longitudinal microdata from the Belgian Social Security Registers, we analyse whether entry into parenthood differentially affected the build-up of first pillar pension rights of working-age migrant women compared to natives between 1998 and 2010, further distinguishing by origin group and migrant generation. The results show that native women are most likely to build up pension rights through full-time employment both before and after parenthood. In contrast, first-generation women and women of Turkish and Moroccan origin are more likely to build up pension rights though assimilated periods or rely on derived pension rights after parenthood, even when controlling for type of pension build-up before parenthood. We conclude that policies reinforcing individualisation of pension rights based on employment or decreasing the importance of derived rights may erode pension protection of groups having limited access to the labour market, and require co-ordination with employment and family policies that support the combination of work and care responsibilities.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, G. 1991. A Treasise on the Family. Enlarged edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettio, F., Tinios, P. and Betti, G. 2013. The Gender Gap in Pensions in the EU. Directorate-General for Justice, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
Bonnet, C., Buffeteau, S. and Godefroy, P. 2006. Effects of pension reforms on gender inequality in France. Population, 61, 1/2, 4575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, C., Meurs, D. and Rapoport, B. 2015. Gender-based pension inequality in the public and private sectors: a distribution analysis. Revue De l'Ires, 87, 4, 3561.Google Scholar
Corijn, M. and Lodewijckx, E. 2009. De start van de gezinsvorming bij de Turkse en Marokkaanse tweede generatie in het Vlaams gewest. Een analyse op basis van Rijksregistergegevens [The Start of Family Formation Among the Turkish and Moroccan Second Generation in the Flemish Region. An Analysis Based on the National Register]. Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering, Brussels.Google Scholar
Corluy, V. and Verbist, G. 2014. Can education bridge the gap? Education and the employment position of immigrants in Belgium. Improve Working Paper Series, Volume 14–02, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.Google Scholar
Davies, H., Joshi, H. and Peronaci, R. 2000. Foregone income and motherhood: what do recent British data tell us? Population Studies, 54, 3, 293305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggerickx, T., Kesteloot, C. and Poulain, M. 1999. Algemene Volks- en Woningtelling op 1 maart 1991. De allochtone bevolking in België [The Census of March 1st 1991. The Migrant Population in Belgium]. Ministerie van Economische Zaken, Nationaal Instituut voor de Statistiek, Brussels.Google Scholar
Even, W. E. and Macpherson, D. A. 1994. Gender differences in pensions. Journal of Human Resources, 29, 2, 555–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federaal Planbureau 2013. Bevolkingsvooruitzichten 2012–2060 [Population Prospects 2012–2060]. Federaal Planbureau en Algemene Directie Statistiek, Brussels.Google Scholar
Frericks, P., Maier, R. and De Graaf, W. 2007. European pension reforms: individualization, privatization and gender pension gaps. Social Politics, 14, 2, 212–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginn, J. and Arber, S. 1993. Pension penalties – the gendered division of occupational welfare. Work, Employment and Society, 7, 1, 4770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginn, J. and Arber, S. 2001. Pension prospects of minority ethnic groups: inequalities by gender and ethnicity. British Journal of Sociology, 52, 3, 519–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grady, J. 2015. Gendering pensions: making women visible. Gender, Work and Organization, 22, 5, 445–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, A. F., Rothon, C. and Kilpi, E. 2008. The second generation in Western Europe: education, unemployment, and occupational attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 211–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersch, J. and Whitemeans, S. 1993. Employer-sponsored health and pension benefits and the gender/race wage gap. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 4, 851–66.Google Scholar
Holland, J. and de Valk, H. 2013. The employment of Turkish second generation women in Europe in comparative perspective. European Commission, Brussels (www.neujobs.eu).Google Scholar
Kil, T., Neels, K., Van den Berg, L. and De Valk, H. 2015. Arbeidsmarkttrajecten van vrouwen met een migratie-achtergrond voor en na de geboorte van een eerste kind. [Labour market trajectories of migrant women before and after the birth of a first child]. Over.werk, 25, 2, 127–34.Google Scholar
Kogan, I. 2007. A study of immigrants’ employment careers in West Germany using the sequence analysis technique. Social Science Research, 36, 2, 491511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, S. 2001. Sex and gender discrimination within EU pension systems. Journal of European Social Policy, 11, 2, 99115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. 2001. The decline of the male breadwinner model: implications for work and care. Social Politics, 8, 2, 152–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liefbroer, A. C. and Corijn, M. 1999. Who, what, where, and when? Specifying the impact of educational attainment and labour force participation on family formation. European Journal of Population, 15, 1, 4575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodewijckx, E. 2013. Recente immigranten in Vlaanderen. Wie zijn ze? [Recent immigrants in Flanders. Who are they?]. SVR-Webartikel 2013/1, Studiedienst van de Vlaamse Regering, Brussels.Google Scholar
Marier, P. 2007. Affirming, transforming, or neglecting gender? Conceptualizing gender in the pension reform process. Social Politics, 14, 2, 182211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marier, P. and Skinner, S. 2008. The impact of gender and immigration on pension outcomes in Canada. Canadian Public Policy – Analyse de Politiques, 34, Supplement 1, S59S78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, T. and Bridgen, P. 2008. Class, gender and chance: the social division of welfare and occupational pensions in the United Kingdom. Ageing & Society, 28, 3, 353–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münz, R., Straubhaar, T., Vadeau, F. and Vadeau, N. 2007. What Are the Migrants’ Contributions to Employment and Growth? A European Approach. HWWI Migration Research Group, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
O'Rand, A. M. and Shuey, K. M. 2007. Gender and the devolution of pension risks in the US. Current Sociology, 55, 2, 287304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2008. The labour market integration of immigrants and their children in Belgium. In Jobs for Immigrants. Volume 2: Labour Market Integration in Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Portugal. OECD Publishing, Paris, 43108.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2010. International Migration Outlook: SOPEMI 2010. OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2011 a. Doing Better for Families. OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2011 b. International Migration Outlook: SOPEMI 2011. OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
Peeters, H. 2016. The devil is in the detail. Delving into Belgian pension adequacy. PhD dissertation, Centre for Sociological Research, Leuven, Belgium.Google Scholar
Price, D. 2007. Closing the gender gap in retirement income: what difference will recent UK pension reforms make? Journal of Social Policy, 36, 4, 561–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendall, M. S., Tsang, F., Rubin, J. K., Rabinovich, L. and Janta, B. 2010. Contrasting trajectories of labor-market integration between migrant women in Western and Southern Europe. European Journal of Population – Revue Europeenne De Demographie, 26, 4, 383410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renga, S., Molnar-Hidassy, D. and Tisheva, G. 2010. Direct and Indirect Gender Discrimination in Old-age Pensions in 33 European Countries. Directorate-General for Justice, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
Rubin, J., Randall, M. S., Rabinovich, L., Tsang, F., Van Oranje Nassau, C. and Janta, B. 2008. Migrant Women in the European Labour Force. RAND Europe, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Samek Lodovici, M., Crepaldi, C., Corsi, M. and Naaf, S. 2011. The Socio-economic Impact of Pension Systems on the Respective Situations of Women and Men and the Effects of Recent Trends in Pension Reforms. Directorate-General for Justice, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
Sigle-Rushton, W. and Waldfogel, J. 2007. Motherhood and women's earnings in Anglo-American, Continental European, and Nordic countries. Feminist Economics, 13, 2, 5591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmerman, C., Vanderwaeren, E. and Crul, M. 2003. The second generation in Belgium. International Migration Review, 37, 4, 1065–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urso, G. and Schuster, A. 2013. Migration, Employment and Labour Market Integration Policies in the European Union. International Organization for Migration, Brussels.Google Scholar
Van Lancker, W., Ghysels, J. and Cantillon, B. 2012. De impact van kinderbijslagen op het armoederisico van alleenstaande moeders: België in vergelijkend perspectief [The Impact of Child Benefits on the Poverty Risk of Lone Mothers. Belgium from a Comparative Perspective]. Centrum voor Sociaal Beleid Herman Deleeck, Antwerpen, Belgium.Google Scholar
Vause, S. 2013. Migraties en migrantenpopulaties in België. Statistisch en demografisch verslag 2013 [Migration and Migrant Populations in Belgium. Statistical and Demographic Report 2013]. Centre de Recherche en démographie et sociétés (DEMO) and Centrum voor Gelijkheid van Kansen en voor Racismebestrijding, Brussels.Google Scholar
Vlachantoni, A. 2010. Gender and pension individualisation: the case of Greece. South European Society and Politics, 15, 2, 225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlachantoni, A., Feng, Z., Evandrou, M. and Falkingham, J. C. 2015. Ethnicity and occupational pension membership in the UK. Social Policy and Administration, 49, 7, 801–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wall, K. and Jose, S. J. 2004. Managing work and care: a difficult challenge for migrant families. Social Policy and Administration, 38, 6, 591621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, J., Neels, K. and Kil, T. 2014. The educational gradient of childlessness and cohort parity progression in 14 low fertility countries. Demographic Research, 31, 46, 1365–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar