Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:39:33.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Living Arrangements and ‘Successful’ Ageing among Ever-Married American White Women 77–87 Years of Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Alice T. Day  and
Lincoln H. Day
Alice T. Day
Affiliation:
Successful Ageing, ACT, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia.
Lincoln H. Day
Affiliation:
Department of Demography, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Data on a nationally representative sample of ever-married white American women born in 1900–1910 show living arrangements to be closely associated with the quality of the ageing experience (with, that is, whether these women were ageing ‘successfully’). The proportions ageing ‘successfully’ were highest among those living only with their husbands, and lowest among those living with kin other than their husbands. In between, but much closer in position to the women living only with their husbands, were those who were living alone. The paper looks at explanations accounting for these differences and considers some of the policy implications of these findings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 365 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brody, J. A. 1985. Prospects for an ageing population. Nature, 06 6: 463–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, M. H. 1983. Strain among caregivers: A study of experience in the United States, The Gerontologist. 23, 434–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chappell, N. and Badger, M. 1989. Social isolation and well-being. Journal of Gerontology, 44 (5), S169–S176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cherlin, A. J. and Furstenberg, F. F. Jr., 1986. The New American Grandparent: A Place in the Family, A Life Apart. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Dawson, D. A., Meny, D. J. and Ridley, J. C. 1980. Fertility control in the United States before the contraceptive revolution. Family Planning Perspectives, 12 (2), 76–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, A. T. 1985a. ‘We Can Manage’– Expectations about Care and Varieties of Family Support among People 75 Years and Over. Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Day, A. T. 1985b. Who Cares? Demographic Trends Challenge Family Care for the Elderly. Population Trends and Public Policy Paper No. 9. Population Reference Bureau, Washington.Google Scholar
Day, A. T. 1989. Kinship networks and informal support in the later years. In Grebenik, E., Höhn, C. and Mackensen, R. (eds.), Later Phases of the Family Life Cycle: Demographic Aspects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 183–207.Google Scholar
Day, A. T. 1991. Remarkable Survivors: Insights into Successful Aging among Women. The Urban Institute Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Day, L. H. 1992. The Future of Low-Birthrate Populations. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
Dykstra, P. A. 1990. Next of (Non)kin: The Importance of Primary Relationships for Older Adults' Well-Being. Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Litwak, E. 1985. Helping Older People: The Complementary Roles of Informal Networks and Formal Systems. Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
Longino, C. F. Jr., 1987. The Social and Economic Characteristics of Very Old Men and Women in the United States. Paper presented to the Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Washington, D.C., 11.Google Scholar
Matthews, S. H. 1985. Sampling issues in surveys of ageing and intergenerational relations. Paper presented at a symposium on Methodological Issues in the Study of Ageing and Intergenerational Relations, Gerontology Research Centre, University of Guelph, Ontario.Google Scholar
Rodin, J. 1986. Aging and health: Effects of a sense of control. Science, 233, 1271–1275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rowland, D. T. 1986. Family structure. In Kendig, H. L. (ed.), Ageing and Families: A Support Networks Perspective, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp. 17–37.Google Scholar
Rook, K. S. 1984a. The negative side of social interaction: Impact on psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 145–154.Google Scholar
Rook, K. S. 1984b. Strategies for helping the lonely and socially isolated. American Psychologist, 39: 1389–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, K. S. 1989. Strains in older adults' friendships. In Adams, R. G. and Blieszner, R. (eds.), Older Adult Friendship: Structure and Process. Sage, London, pp. 166–194.Google Scholar
Rosenmayr, L. and Kockeis, E. 1968. Propositions for a sociological theory of aging and the family. International Social Science Journal, 15, 410–426.Google Scholar
Shanas, E. 1979. The family as a social support system in old age. American Sociological Review, 19, 169–174.Google ScholarPubMed
Soldo, B.J., Wolf, D. A. and Agree, E. M. 1986. Family, household and care arrangements of disabled older women: A structural analysis. Paper presented at annual scientific meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Chicago, 11 14–21.Google Scholar
Stone, R., Cafferata, G. L. and Sangl, J. 1987. Caregivers of the frail elderly: A national profile. The Gerontologist, 27 (5), 616–626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streib, G. G. 1983. The frail elderly: Research dilemmas and research opportunities. The Gerontologist, 23 (1), 40–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellman, B. and Hall, A. 1986. Social networks and social support: Implications for later life. In Marshall, V. (ed.), Later Life: The Social Psychology of Aging. Sage, London, pp. 191–231.Google Scholar
Wolf, D. A. 1984. Kin availability and the living arrangements of older women. Social Science Research, 13 (1), 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar