Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:46:57.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Net Gains from 'Net Purchases? Farmers’ Preferences for Online and Local Input Purchases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Marvin T. Batte  and
Stan Ernst
Marvin T. Batte
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics at the Ohio State University
Stan Ernst
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics at the Ohio State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

E-commerce represents both threats to and opportunities for rural communities. This study addresses one element of the issue: farmers’ willingness to substitute online merchants or national farm input stores for local businesses. Results of a conjoint analysis of contingent choice experiments suggest that farmers are willing to purchase from online or national stores outside their communities if compensated with lower prices or greater services. Results also demonstrate that the context of the input purchase, such as time constraints, was very important not only in valuing these services, but, more broadly, in terms of the farmer's loyalty to a local merchant.

Keywords

e-commercefarm input purchasewillingness to paycontingent choicerural communities
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , April 2007 , pp. 84 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American City Business Journals. 2003. “The Internet Economic Indicators Facts and Figures.” Available online at www.internetindicators.com/facts/html (accessed July 18, 2003).Google Scholar
Batte, M. T. 2004. “Computer Adoption and Use by Ohio Farmers.” Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers 67(1): 108–111.Google Scholar
Batte, M. T. 2006. “Shopping at the Farm Office: What Is the Future of Farm E-commerce?” Journal of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers 69(1): 100–105.Google Scholar
Batte, M. T., Jones, E., and Schnitkey, G. D. 1990 “Computer Use by Ohio Commercial Farmers.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72(4): 935–945.Google Scholar
Batte, M. T., Schnitkey, G. D., Rister, M. E., and Frank, G. 1995 “Farm Information Systems’ Design and Use.” In Batte, M. T., ed., Adoption and Use of Farm Information Systems. North Central Regional Research Publication No. 339, OARDC (Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center) Special Circular No. 149 (November).Google Scholar
Bejjani, G. 2000. “Venture Capital Perspectives on the Ag.com Industry.” Presentation at the CARD 2000 Agricultural Forum entitled “E-commerce: The Net Effect on Agribusiness” at the Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) in Ames, Iowa, February 28, 2000. Available online at www.agforum.org/2000/home.html (accessed May 1, 2001).Google Scholar
Castle, E. N. 1998. “Agricultural Industrialization in the American Countryside.” Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture Policy Studies Report No. 11 (October).Google Scholar
Fox, S. 2005. “Digital Divisions.” Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, D. C. Available online at www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/165/report_display.asp (accessed January 15, 2006).Google Scholar
Hanemann, M., and Loomis, J. 1991. “Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73(4): 1255–1263.Google Scholar
Lemoux, N., Wortman, M. S. Jr., and Mathias, E. D. 2001. “Dominant Factors Impacting the Development of Business-to-Business (B2B) E-commerce in Agriculture.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 4(2): 205–218.Google Scholar
Lusk, J.L., and Hudson, D. 2004. “Willingness-to-Pay Estimates and Agribusiness Decision Making.” Review of Agricultural Economics 26(2): 152–169.Google Scholar
Lyman, P., and Varian, H. R. 2003. “How Much Information.” Available online at www.sims.berkeley.edu/how-much-info-2003/ (accessed January 15, 2006).Google Scholar
National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). 2005. “Farm Computer Usage and Ownership.” U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. Available online at usda.mann[-]lib.cornell.edu/usda/current/FarmComp/FarmComp-08-12-2005.pdf (accessed November 22, 2006).Google Scholar
Park, T., and Mishra, A. 2003. “Internet Usage by Farmers: Evidence from a National Survey.” Selected paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada, July 27-30, 2003.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. 2001. “Strategy and the Internet.” Harvard Business Review 79(3): 63–78.Google Scholar
Putler, D. S., and Zilberman, D. 1988. “Computer Use in Agriculture: Evidence from Tulare County, California.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70(4): 790–802.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: McMillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Rush, L. 2003. “U. S. E-commerce to See Significant Growth by 2008.” Cyberatlas (August 7). Available online at cyberatlas.internet.com/markets/retailing/print/0,6061_2246041,00.html (accessed November 13, 2003).Google Scholar
U. S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy. 1999a. E-commerce: Small Businesses Venture Online (July). Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
U. S. Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy. 1999b. Rural and Urban Areas by Firm Size, 1990–1995 (March). Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Wheatley, W.P., B., Buhr, and D., DiPietre. 2001. “E-Commerce in Agriculture: Development, Strategy and Market Implications.” Staff Paper No. POI-6, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota (July).Google Scholar