Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:01:10.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a cyber-physical manufacturing metrology model for industry 4.0

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2020

Slavenko M. Stojadinovic Open the ORCID record for Slavenko M. Stojadinovic [Opens in a new window] ,
Vidosav D. Majstorovic  and
Numan M. Durakbasa
Slavenko M. Stojadinovic*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department for Production Engineering, University of Belgrade, Kraljice Marije 16, 11120Belgrade 35 PF 34, Serbia
Vidosav D. Majstorovic
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department for Production Engineering, University of Belgrade, Kraljice Marije 16, 11120Belgrade 35 PF 34, Serbia
Numan M. Durakbasa
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Department for Interchangeable Manufacturing and Industrial Metrology, Vienna University of Technology, 1060 Wien, Getreidemarkt 9/311-01-4, BA09, Austria
*
Author for correspondence: Slavenko M. Stojadinovic, E-mail: sstojadinovic@mas.bg.ac.rs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Industry 4.0 represents high-level methodologies for the development of new generation manufacturing metrology systems, which are more intelligent (smart), autonomous, flexible, high-productive, and self-adaptable. One of the systems capable of responding to these challenges is a cyber-physical manufacturing metrology system (CP2MS) with techniques of artificial intelligence (AI). In general, CP2MS systems generate Big data, horizontally by integration [coordinate measuring machines (CMMs)] and vertically by control. This paper presents a cyber-physical manufacturing metrology model (CP3M) for Industry 4.0 developed by applying AI techniques such as engineering ontology (EO), ant-colony optimization (ACO), and genetic algorithms (GAs). Particularly, the CP3M presents an intelligent approach of probe configuration and setup planning for inspection of prismatic measurement parts (PMPs) on a CMM. A set of possible PMP setups and probe configurations is reduced to optimal number using developed GA-based methodology. The major novelty is the development of a new CP3M capable of responding to the requirements of an Industry 4.0 concept such as intelligent, autonomous, and productive measuring systems. As such, they respond to one smart metrology requirement within the framework of Industry 4.0, referring to the optimal number of PMPs setups and for each setup defines the configurations of probes. The main contribution of the model is productivity increase of the measuring process through the reduction of the total measurement time, as well as the elimination of errors due to the human factor through intelligent planning of probe configuration and part setup. The experiment was successfully performed using a PMP specially designed and manufactured for the purpose.

Keywords

Cyber-physicalGAIndustry 4.0intelligent planningmetrology
Type
Research Article
Information
AI EDAM , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 20 - 36
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, JB, Fernandez, P, Rico, CJ, Mateos, S and Suarez, MC (2008) Accessibility analysis for automatic inspection in CMMs by using bounding volume hierarchies. International Journal of Production Research 46, 5797–5826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthold, J and Imkamp, D (2013) Looking at the future of manufacturing metrology: roadmap document of the German VDI/VDE Society for Measurement and Automatic Control. Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems 2, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, HC and Lin, AC (2010) Automatic inspection of turbine blades using 5-axis coordinate measurement machine. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 23, 1071–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, HC and Lin, AC (2011) Five-axis automated measurement by coordinate measuring machine. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 55, 657–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, YM and Chen, FL (1999) CMM probing accessibility in a single slot. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 15, 261–267.Google Scholar
ElMaraghy, AH and Gu, HP (1987) Expert system for inspection planning. Annals of the CIRP 36, 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germani, M, Mandorli, F, Mengoni, M and Raffaeli, R (2010) CAD-based environment to bridge the gap between product design and tolerance control. Precision Engineering 34, 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussien, AH, Youssefy, MA and Shoukryz, KM (2012) Automated inspection planning system for CMMs. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Technology. Cairo: IEEE, pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, J and Park, KD (1998) Probe orientation for coordinate measuring machine systems using design models. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 14, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, JY and Chen, KJ (2007) Localization of parts with irregular shape for CMM inspection. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 32, 1188–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazzari, А, Pou, J, Dubois, C and Leblond, L (2017) Smart metrology: the importance of metrology of decisions in the big data era. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine 20, 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liangsheng, Q, Guanhua, X and Guohua, W (1998) Optimization of the measuring path on a coordinate measuring machine using genetic algorithms. Measurement 23, 159–170.Google Scholar
Lim, PC and Menq, HC (1994) CMM feature accessibility path generation. International Journal of Production Research 32, 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limaiem, A and ElMaraghy, HA (1998) Automatic path planning for coordinate measuring machine. Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 887–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limaiem, A and Maraghy, HE (1997) A general method for analysing the accessibility of features using concentric spherical shells. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 13, 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, GC, Morton, D, Wu, HM and Myler, P (1999) Genetic algorithm modelling and solution of inspection path planning on a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 15, 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majstorovic, V, Stojadinovic, S and Sibalija, T (2015) Development of a knowledge base for the planning of prismatic parts inspection on CMM. Acta IMEKO 42, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majstorović, V, Stojadinovic, S, Zivkovic, S, Djurdjanovic, D, Jakovljevic, Z and Gligorijevic, N (2017) Cyber-physical manufacturing metrology model (CPM3) for sculptured surfaces – turbine blade application. Procedia CIRP 63, 658–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majstorovic, V, et al. (2019) Advanced manufacturing metrology in context of industry 4.0 model. In Majstorovic VD and Durakbasa NM (eds), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Measurement and Quality Control - Cyber Physical Issue. Springer International Publishing, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metrology for the Digitalization of the Economy and Society (2017) Report of the German Council of Science and Humanities. Available at https://www.bipm.org/cc/PARTNERS/Allowed/2017_October/2017-Metrology-for-the-Digitalisation-of-Economy-and-Society.pdf (accessed June 2019).Google Scholar
Osanna, HP (1997) Intelligent production metrology - A powerful tool for intelligent manufacturing. e&i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 114, 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravishankar, S, Dutt, HNV and Gurumoorthy, B (2010) Automated inspection of aircraft parts using a modified ICP algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 46, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, O and Nyman, R (2013) Efficiently Vectorized Code for Population Based Optimization Algorithms. UCL Department of Computer Science, Research Note.Google Scholar
Rico, CJ, Valino, G, Mateous, S, Cuesta, E and Suarez, MC (2002) Accessibility analysis for star probes in automatic inspection of rotational parts. International Journal of Production Research 40, 1493–1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, U, Xu, Y and Wang, L (1994) Development of an intelligent inspection planning system in an object oriented programming environment. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 7, 240–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitz, NS, Spyridi, JA and Requicha, GAA (1999) Accessibility analysis for planning of dimensional inspection with coordinate measuring machines. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 15, 714–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojadinovic, S (2016) Intelligent Concept for the Inspection Planning of Prismatic Parts on Measuring Machine (PhD thesis (on Serbian language)). University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering.Google Scholar
Stojadinovic, S and Majstorovic, V (2012) Towards the development of feature-based ontology for inspection planning system on CMM. Journal of Machine Engineering 12, 89–98.Google Scholar
Stojadinovic, S and Majstorovic, V (2014) Developing engineering ontology for domain coordinate metrology. FME Transactions 42, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojadinovic, MS and Majstorovic, DV (2019) An Intelligent System for CMM Inspection Planning of Prismatic Parts. Springer Nature Switzerland AG: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojadinovic, S, Majstorovic, V, Durakbasa, N and Sibalija, T (2016 a) Towards an intelligent approach for CMM inspection planning of prismatic parts. Measurement. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.06.037 (ISSN 0263-2241).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojadinovic, S, Majstorovic, V, Durakbasa, N and Sibalija, T (2016 b) Ants colony optimization of the measuring path of prismatic parts on a CMM. Metrology and Measurement Systems. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mms-2016-0011 (ISSN 0860-8292).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Y, Liu, S and Zhang, G (2004) Improvement of coordinate measuring machine probing accessibility. Precision Engineering 28, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yau, HT and Menq, CH (2005) Automated CMM path planning for dimensional inspecton of dies and molds having complex surface. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 35, 861–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, SG, Ajmal, A, Wootton, J and Chisholm, A (2000) A feature based inspection process planning system for co-ordinate measuring machine (CMM). Journal of Materials Processing Technology 107, 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y, Xu, X, Kramer, T, Proctor, F and Horst, J (2011) Dimensional metrology interoperability and standardization in manufacturing systems. Computer Standards and Interfaces 33, 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, H, Kruth, JP, Gestel, NV, Boeckmans, B and Bleys, P (2012) Automated dimensional inspection planning using the combination of laser scanner and tactile probe. Measurement 45, 1057–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziemian, CW and Medeiros, DJ (1997) Automated feature accessibility for inspection on a coordinate measuring machine. International Journal of Production Research 35, 2839–2856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziemian, W and Medeiros, JD (1998) Automating probe selection and part setup planning for inspection on a coordinate measuring machine. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 11, 448–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar