Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:21:32.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disaster or Catastrophe: Human Adaptation to High- and Low-Frequency Landscape Processes—A Reply to Ensor, Ensor, and Devries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael R. Waters  and
John C. Ravesloot
Michael R. Waters
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4352
John C. Ravesloot
Affiliation:
Cultural Resource Management Program, Department of Land and Water Resouces P.O. Box 2140, Gila River Indian Community, Sacaton, AZ 85247
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A regional episode of erosion between A.D. 1020 and 1160 coincides with social, political, economic, and demographic changes in the Hohokam culture. This regional erosional event was of such magnitude that it accelerated cultural changes that were already underway. The Ensor et al. (2003) commentary and attempt to layer a number of hypotheses on our original interpretations are fraught with problems.

Résumé

Résumé

Un episodio regional de erosión sucedido entre los años 1060 y 1160 d.C. coincidió con cambios socials, políticos, económicos, y demográficos en la cultura Hohokam. Este evento erosivo regional fue de tal magnitud que aceleró los cambios culturales ya iniciados. Los comentarios de Ensor et. al. (2003) y sus intentos de conectar una serie de hipótesis con nuestra interpretación original están plagados de errores.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , April 2003 , pp. 400 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Blanton, R. E., Kowalewski, S. E., Feinman, G. M., and Appel, J. 1981 Ancient Mesoamerica: A Comparison of Change in Three Regions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butzer, K. W. 2002 Archaeology as Human Ecology: Method and Theory for a Contextual Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Crumley, C. L. 1994 Historical Ecology: A Multidimensional Ecological Orientation. In Historical Ecology: Culural Knowledge and Changing Landscapes, edited by Crumley, C. L., pp. 1–16. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Darling, J. A., Ravesloot, J. C., and Waters, M. R. 2002 Village Drift, Riverine Settlement, and the Case for Hohokam-Piman Continuity. Paper Presented at the Symposium entitled Visible Archaeology on the Gila River Indian Reservation, 67th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Denver.Google Scholar
Dean, J.S. 1988 A Model of Anasazi Behavioral Adaptation. In The Anasazi in a Changing Environment, edited by Gumerman, G. J., pp. 25–14. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eiselt, B. S., Woodson, M. K., Touchin, J., and Davis, E. 2002 A Cultural Resources Assessment of the Casa Blanca Management Area, Pima-Maricopa Irrigation Project (P- MIP), Gila River Indian Community, Arizona. P-MIP Report No. 8. Cultural Resource Management Program, Gila River Indian Community, Sacaton, Arizona.Google Scholar
Eiselt, B. S. and Woodson, M. K. 2002 The Organization of Two Hohokam Platform Mound Communities Along the Casa Blanca Canal System: An Example from the Middle Gila Valley. Paper Presented at the Symposium entitled Visible Archaeology on the Gila River Indian Reservation, 67th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Denver.Google Scholar
Ensor, B. E., Ensor, M., and De Vries, G. W. 2003 Hohokam Political Ecology and Vulnerability: Comments on Waters and Ravesloot. American Antiquity 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, S. K. Fish, P. R., and Madsen, J. H. (editors) 1992 The Marana Community in the Hohokam World. Anthropological Papers 56. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Gumerman, G. J. 1991 Understanding the Hohokam. In Exploring the Hohokam: Prehistoric Desert Peoples of the American Southwest, edited by Gumerman, G. J., pp. 1–27. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Hall, S. A. 1990 Channel Trenching and Climate Change in the Southern U.S. and Great Plains. Geology 9:342–345.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1945 The Excavation of Los Muertos and Neighboring Ruins in the Salt River Valley, Southwestern Arizona. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology 24. Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Haury, E. W. 1976 The Hohokam: Desert Farmers and Craftsmen. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loendorf, C., and Rice, G. E. 2002 Archaic and Formative Land-Use on the Middle Gila. Paper Presened at the Symposium entitled Visible Archaeology on the Gila River Indian Reservation, 67th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Denver.Google Scholar
Oliver-Smith, A., and Hoffman, S. M. (editors) 1999 The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective. Routledge, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, K., Vincent, E., and Rice, G. E. 2002 Who Used the Area Between the Rivers? Employing Ceramic Temper Analysis to Study the Boundary Between the Gila and Salt River. Paper Presented at the Symposium entitled Visible Archaeology on the Gila River Indian Reservation, 67th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Denver.Google Scholar
Randolph, B. G., Darling, J. A., Loendorf, C., and Rockette, B. 2002 Historic Piman Site Structure and the Evolution of the Sacate Site (GR-909), Gila River Indian Community. Paper Presented at the Symposium entitled Visible Archaeology on the Gila River Indian Reservation, 67th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Denver.Google Scholar
Ravesloot, J. C., and Waters, M. R. 2002 A Geoarchaeological Approach to Interpreting Site Patterning on the Middle Gila River Valley, Arizona. Paper Presented at the Symposium entitled Visible Archaeology on the Gila River Indian Reservation, 67th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Denver.Google Scholar
Reycraft, R. M., and Bawden, G. (editors) 2000 Environmental Disaster and the Archaeology of Human Response. Maxwell Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Paper No. 7. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Rice, G. E., and Ravesloot, J. C. 2002 Hohokam Public Architecture and Settlement Systems on the Middle Gila River. Paper presented at the Symposium entitled Visible Archaeology on the Gila River Indian Reservation, 67th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Denver.Google Scholar
Ritter, D. F. Craig, R., and Miller, J. R. 1995 Process Geomorphology. Wm. C. Brown, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Waters, M. R., and Haynes, C. V. 2001 Late Quaternary Arroyo Formation and Climate Change in the American Southwest. Geology 29:399–402.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, M. R., and Ravesloot, J. C. 2000 Late Quaternary Geology of the Middle Gila River, Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona. Quaternary Research 54:49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, M. R., and Ravesloot, J. C. 2001 Landscape Change and the Cultural Evolution of the Hohokam Along the Middle Gila River and Other River Valleys in South-Central Arizona. American Antiquity 66:285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodson, K. W. and Rice, G. E. 2002 The Hegemony of the Casa Grande Platform Mound Community. Paper Presented at the Symposium entitled Visible Archaeology on the Gila River Indian Community, 67th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Denver.Google Scholar