Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-gr6zb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-27T10:25:49.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduced Mobility or the Bow and Arrow? Another Look at “Expedient” Technologies and Sedentism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jim A. Railey
Jim A. Railey*
Affiliation:
SWCA Environmental Consultants, 5647 Jefferson Street NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87109 (jrailey@swca.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Parry and Kelly (1987) argued for a causal link between expedient technologies and sedentism, and their explanation has widely influenced lithic analysts. There are some problems with their explanation, however, including disconnects in the reported timing of the shifts to expedient technologies, agricultural intensification, and sedentism. On the other hand, across much of North America the transition to an expedient technology appears to correlate more closely to the arrival of the bow and arrow. This is supported by data from a large excavation project in southern New Mexico, which shows that indicators of the shift to an expedient technology cannot be attributed to reduced mobility or any observable changes in subsistence practices, but do appear to correlate temporally with the appearance of arrow points.

Resumen

Resumen

Parry y Kelly (1987) argumentan un vínculo casual entre tecnologías de mínimo esfuerzo y sedentarismo, y sus explicaciones fueron ampliamente influenciadas por análisis líticos. Sin embargo, hay algunos problemas con sus explicaciones, que incluyen desconexiones en los momentos de cambio reportado para tecnologías mínimas, intensificación agricultura y sedentarismo. Por otro lado, a través de gran parte de Norte América la transición a una tecnología oportuna o mínima parece correlacionarse más estrechamente con la llegada del arco y la flecha. Esto se apoya en los datos de un gran proyecto de excavación en el sur de Nuevo México, el cual muestra que los indicadores de cambios a una tecnología oportuna o mínima no pueden ser atribuidos a la reducida movilidad o cualquier cambio observable en prácticas subsistentes, pero parece correlacionarse temporalmente con la aparición de las puntas de flechas.

Type
Forum
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 259 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ahler, Stanley A. 1989 Mass Analysis of Flaking Debris: Studying the Forest Rather than the Tree. In Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, edited by D. O. Henry and G. H. Odell, pp. 85–118. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 1. American Anthropological Association, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
Aikens, C. Melvin 1970 Hogup Cave. University of Utah Anthropological Papers No. 93. University of Utah, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Aikens, C. Melvin 1976 Cultural Hiatus in the Eastern Great Basin? American Antiquity 41:543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrefsky, William Jr. 2005 Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Analysis. 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachechi, L., Fabbri, P.-F., and Mallegni, F. 1997 An Arrow-Caused Lesion in a Late Upper Paleolithic Human Pelvis. Current Anthropology 38:135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelov, Ilya 2006 Signs of Sedentism and Mobility in an Agro-pastoral community during the Levantine Middle Bronze Age: Interpreting Site Function and Occupation Strategy at Zahrat adh-Dhra’ 1 in Jordan. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 25:117–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettinger, Robert L., and Eerkens, Jelmer 1999 Point Typologies, Cultural Transmission, and the Spread of the Bow-and-Arrow Technology in the Prehistoric Great Basin. American Antiquity 64:231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettinger, Robert L., and Taylor, R. E. 1974 Suggested Revisions in Archaeological Sequences of the Great Basin in Interior Southern California. Nevada Archaeological Survey Research Paper No. 5:1–26.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1979 Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at Curated Technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 35:255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1980 Willow Smoke and Dogs’ Tails: Hunter-gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity 45:4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blitz, John H. 1988 Adoption of the Bow in Prehistoric North America. North American Archaeologist 9(2):123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, Errett 1979 The Basics of Biface Knapping in the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition: A Manual for Flintknappers and Lithic Analysts. Archaeology of Eastern North America 7(1):1–80.Google Scholar
Campbell, Kirsten, and Railey, Jim A. (editors) 2008 Archaeology of the Hondo Valley, Lincoln County, New Mexico: Archaeological Investigations Along US 70 from Ruidoso Downs to Riverside. New Mexico Department of Transportation, Cultural Resource Technical Series 2006-1. SWCA Environmental Consultants and Parsons Brinckerhoff, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Carr, Philip J. 1994 The Organization of Technology: Impact and Potential. In The Organization of Prehistoric North American Chipped-Stone Tool Technologies, edited by Philip J. Carr, pp. 1–8. International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Cattelain, Pierre 1997 Hunting during the Upper Paleolithic: Bow, Spearthrower, or Both? In Projectile Technology, edited by Heidi Knecht, pp. 213–240. Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Jefferson C. 1977 Archaic Period Research in the Lower Tennessee Valley. Report of Investigations No. 18. Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Collins, Michael B. 1975 Lithic Technology as a Means of Processual Inference. In Lithic Technology, Making and Using Stone Tools, edited by Earl Swanson, pp. 14–334. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
Cordell, Linda 1997 Archaeology of the Southwest. 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Corliss, David W. 1972 Neck Width of Projectile Points: an Index of Culture Continuity and Change. Occasional Papers of the Idaho State University Museum 29. Idaho State University, Pocatello.Google Scholar
Crabtree, Don E. 1973 Experiments in Replicating Hohokam Points. Tebiwa 16:10–45.Google Scholar
Damp, Jonathan E., Hall, Stephen A., and Smith, Susan J. 2002 Early Irrigation on the Colorado Plateau near Zuni Pueblo, New Mexico. American Antiquity 67:665–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancey, William S. 1988 The Community Plan of an Early Late Woodland Village in the Middle Scioto River Valley. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 13:223–254.Google Scholar
Davenport, J.W. 1943 Some Experiments in the Use of the Atlatl. Bulletin of the Texas Archaeological and Paleontological Society 15:30–37.Google Scholar
Drass, Richard S. 1998 The Southern Plains Villagers. In Archaeology on the Great Plains, edited by W. Raymond Wood, pp. 415–455. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Ebert, James I. 1979 An Ethnoarchaeological Approach to Reassessing the Meaning of Variability in Stone Tool Assemblages. In Ethno-archaeology: Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology, edited by Carol Kramer, pp. 59–74. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Emerson, Thomas E., McElrath, Dale L., and Fortier, Andrew C. (editors) 2000 Late Woodland Societies: Tradition and Transformation across the Midcontinent. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Esarey, Duane, Sampson, Kelvin, and Suchy, Charles 1984 The Carter Creek Site: A Weaver Phase Ring Midden in the Interior Uplands of West Central Illinois. Wisconsin Archaeologist 65:131–144.Google Scholar
Fawcett, W. B. Jr., and Kornfeld, M. 1980 Projectile Point Neck-Width Variability and Chronology on the Plains. Wyoming Contributions to Anthropology 2:66–79.Google Scholar
Fenenga, Franklin 1953 The Weights of Chipped Stone Points: a Clue to Their Functions. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 9:309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbis, Richard G. 1960 The Old Women’s Buffalo Jump, Alberta Ec-Pl I. Contributions to Anthropology, National Museum of Canada, Bulletin No. 180, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Ford, James A., and Webb, Clarence H. 1956 Poverty Point, a Late Archaic Site in Louisiana. Anthropological Papers Vol. 46, Pt. 1. American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
Fritz, Gayle J. 1993 Early and Middle Woodland Period Paleoethnobotany. In Foraging and Farming in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by Margaret Scarry, pp. 39–56. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Geib, Phil R., and Bungart, Peter W. 1989 Implications of Early Bow Use in Glen Canyon. Utah Archaeology 2(1):32–47.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Dawn 2008a Flaked Stone. In Archaeology of the Hondo Valley, Lincoln County, New Mexico: Archaeological Investigations Along US 70 from Ruidoso Downs to Riverside, edited by Kirsten Campbell and Jim A. Railey, pp. 469–527. New Mexico Department of Transportation, Cultural Resource Technical Series 2006-1. SWCA Environmental Consultants and Parsons Brinckerhoff, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Dawn 2008b Appendix H: Projectile Point Data. In Archaeology of the Hondo Valley, Lincoln County, New Mexico: Archaeological Investigations Along US 70 from Ruidoso Downs to Riverside, edited by Kirsten Campbell and Jim A. Railey, pp. 913–918. New Mexico Department of Transportation, Cultural Resource Technical Series 2006-1. SWCA Environmental Consultants and Parsons Brinckerhoff, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Guernsey, Samuel James 1931 Explorations in Northeastern Arizona: Report on the Archaeological Fieldwork of 1920-23. Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University 12(1):1–123.Google Scholar
Hamilton, T. M. 1982 Native American Bows (Second Edition). Special Publications 5. Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia, Missouri.Google Scholar
Hassig, Ross 1988 Aztec Warfare: Imperial Expansion and Political Control. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Huckell, Bruce B. 1998 An Analysis of the Flaked Stone Artifacts. In Early Farmers of the Sonoran Desert: Archaeological Investigations at the Houghton Road Site, Tucson, Arizona, edited by Richard Ciolek-Torrello, pp. 89–117. Statistical Research, Inc., Technical Series 72, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Hughes, Susan 1998 Getting to the Point: Evolutionary Change in Prehistoric Weaponry. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1:345–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, Richard W. 1996 Hunters and Gatherers after the Ice Age. In Kentucky Archaeology, edited by R. Barry Lewis, pp. 39–77. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington.Google Scholar
Jeffries, Richard W., and Mark Lynch, B. 1983 Dimensions of Middle Archaic Cultural Adaptation at the Black Earth Site, Saline County, Illinois. In Archaic Hunters and Gatherers in the American Midwest, edited by James L. Phillips and James A. Brown, pp. 299–322. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Sissel 1993 Farmers of the Late Woodland. In Foraging and Farming in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by C. Margaret Scarry, pp. 57–77. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jay K. 1989 The Utility of Production Trajectory Modeling as a Framework for Regional Analysis. In Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis, edited by Donald O. Henry and George H. Odell, pp. 119–138. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 1. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Justice, Noel D. 2002 Stone Age Spear and Arrow Points of the Southwestern United States. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Kellar, James H. 1955 The Atlatl of North America. Indiana Historical Society, Prehistory Research Series 3(2). Indiana Historical Society, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Kelly, Robert L. 1988 The Three Sides of a Biface. American Antiquity 53:717–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidder, Alfred V. 1938 Arrow-heads or Dart Points. American Antiquity 4:156–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Steven L. 1994 A Formal Approach to the Design and Assembly of Formal Toolkits. American Antiquity 59:426–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Thomas M. N., and Lewis, Madeline K. 1961 Eva: An Archaic Site. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, Kent G. 1984 The Duncan Project: A Study of the Occupation Duration and Settlement Pattern of an Early Mogollon Pithouse Village. Arizona State University Anthropological Field Studies No. 6. Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Lipe, William D. 1978 The Southwest. In Ancient Native Americans, edited by Jesse D. Jennings, pp. 327–401. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. Lee, VanPool, Todd L., and O’Brien, Michael J. 2009 The Diversity of North American Projectile-point Types, Before and After the Bow and Arrow. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 28:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabry, Jonathan B. 2005 Changing Knowledge and Ideas about the First Farmers in Southeastern Arizona. In The Late Archaic across the Borderlands: From Foraging to Farming, edited by Bradley J. Vierra, pp. 41–83. University of Texas Press, Austin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquardt, Willam H., and Watson, Patty Jo (editors) 2005 Archaeology of the Middle Green River Region, Kentucky. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Mason, Otis T. 1885 Throwing Sticks in the National Museum. Smithsonian Institution Annual Report for 1884, part 2, pp. 279–290, plates 1–16. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Morris, Elizabeth 1980 Basketmaker Caves in the Prayer Rock District, Northeastern Arizona. Anthropological Papers No. 35, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Nassaney, Michael S., and Pyle, Kendra 1999 The Adoption of the Bow and Arrow in Eastern North America: AView from Central Arkansas. American Antiquity 64:243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, George H. 1988 Addressing Prehistoric Hunting Practices through Stone Tool Analysis. American Anthropologist 90:335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odell, George H., and Cowan, Frank 1986 Experiments with Spears and Arrows on Animal Targets. Journal of Field Archaeology 13:195–212.Google Scholar
Parry, William J. 1987 Technological Change: Temporal and Functional Variability in Chipped Stone Debitage. In Prehistoric Stone Technology on Northern Black Mesa, Arizona, edited by William J. Parry and Andre L. Christenson, pp. 199–256. Occasional Paper 12, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Parry, William J., and Kelly, Robert L. 1987 Expedient Core Technology and Sedentism. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by Jay K. Johnson and Carol A. Morrow, pp. 285–304. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Patterson, L. W. 1980 Early Use of the Bow and Arrow in Southern North America. Anthropological Journal of Canada 18(2):7–13.Google Scholar
Patterson, L. W. 1985 Distinguishing Between Arrow and Spear Points on the Upper Texas Coast. Lithic Technology 14:81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasciunas, Mary M. 2007 Bifacial Cores and Flake Production Efficiency: An Experimental Test of Technological Assumptions. American Antiquity 72:334–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railey, Jim A. (editor) 1984 The Pyles Site (15Ms28): A Newtown Village in Mason County, Kentucky. Occasional Paper No. 1. William S. Webb Archaeological Society, Lexington, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Railey, Jim A. 1991 Woodland Settlement Trends and Symbolic Architecture in the Kentucky Bluegrass. In The Human Landscape in Kentucky’s Past: Site Structure and Settlement Patterns, edited by Charles Stout and Christine K. Hensley, pp. 56–77. Kentucky Heritage Council, Frankfort.Google Scholar
Railey, Jim A. 1996 Woodland Cultivators. In Kentucky Archaeology, edited by R. Barry Lewis, pp. 79–125. University of Kentucky Press, Lexington.Google Scholar
Railey, Jim A. 2008a Forget Flake Types: Attribute Analyses of Debitage-Assemblage Variability. Paper presented at the Seventy-third Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Railey, Jim A. 2008b Flaked Stone: Background and Research Potential. In Animas-La Plata Project: Volume XI - Lithic Studies, by Jim A. Railey and Alexander L. Wesson, pp. 1–12. SWCA Anthropological Research Paper Number 10, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Railey, Jim A., and Erhardt, Erik Barry 2008 Analysis of Projectile Points. In Animas-La Plata Project: Volume XI - Lithic Studies, by Jim A. Railey and Alexander L. Wesson, pp. 145–188. SWCA Anthropological Research Paper Number 10, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Railey, Jim A., and Ruscavage-Barz, Samantha 2008 Synthesis and Interpretations. In Archaeology of the Hondo Valley, Lincoln County, New Mexico: Archaeological Investigations Along US 70 from Ruidoso Downs to Riverside, edited by Kirsten Campbell and Jim A. Railey, pp. 707–760. New Mexico Department of Transportation, Cultural Resource Technical Series 2006-1. SWCA Environmental Consultants and Parsons Brinckerhoff, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Railey, Jim A., Lundquist, Lance, and Jia, Liangya 2007 Lithic Artifacts. In Data Recovery at Five Archaeological Sites Along US 491, North of Sheep Springs, San Juan County, New Mexico, edited by Jim A. Railey, pp. 199–260. New Mexico Department of Transportation, Cultural Resource Technical Series 2007-1. SWCA Environmental Consultants, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Reed, Paul F. (editor) 2000 Foundations of Anasazi: The Basketmaker-Pueblo Transition. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Rocek, Thomas R. 1995 Sedentarization and Agricultural Dependence: Perspectives from the Pit House-to-Pueblo Transition in the American Southwest. American Antiquity 60:218–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossen, Jack 1988 Botanical Remains. In Muir (15JS86): An Early Fort Ancient Village in Central Kentucky, edited by Christopher A. Turnbow and William E. Sharp, pp. 243–264. University of Kentucky, Archaeological Report 171, Lexington.Google Scholar
Rossen, Jack 1999 Archaeobotanical Remains. In Woodland Occupations along Clear Creek in Southeastern Kentucky, edited by B. Jo Stokes and Carl R. Shields, pp. 73–86. Research Report No. 2, Kentucky Archaeological Survey, Lexington.Google Scholar
Scarry, C. Margaret 1993 Variability in Mississippian Crop Production Strategies. In Foraging and Farming in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by C. Margaret Scarry, pp. 78–90. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F. 1992 The Bow and Arrow, the Intrusive Mound Complex, and a Late Woodland Jack’s Reef Horizon in the Mid-Ohio Valley. In Cultural Variability in Context: Woodland Settlements of the Mid-Ohio Valley, edited by Mark F. Seeman, pp. 41–51. MCJA Special Paper 7. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 1986 Settlement Mobility and Technological Organization: An Ethnographic Example. Journal of Anthropological Research 42:15–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 1989 Childers and Woods: Two Late Woodland Sites in the Upper Ohio Valley, Mason County, West Virginia. Archaeological Report No. 200. Program for Cultural Resources Assessment, University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 1993 Spears, Darts, and Arrows: Late Woodland Hunting Techniques in the Upper Ohio Valley. American Antiquity 58:425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 1994 Size and Form in the Analysis of Flake Debris: Review and Recent Approaches. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1(1):69–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 1996 Innovation and Selection in Prehistory: A Case Study from the American Bottom. In Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, edited by George H. Odell, pp. 279–309. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shott, Michael J. 1997 Stones and Shaft Redux: The Metric Discrimination of Chipped-stone Dart and Arrow Points. American Antiquity 62:86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sliva, R. Jane 1999 Cienega Points and Late Archaic Period Chronology in the Southern Southwest. Kiva 64(3):339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sliva, R. Jane 2005 Developments in Flaked Stone Technology During the Transition to Agriculture. In Material Cultures and Life-ways of Early Agricultural Communities in Southern Arizona, edited by R. Jane Sliva, pp. 47–98. Anthropological Papers No. 35, Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Steinacher, Terry L., and Carlson, Gayle F. 1998 The Central Plains Tradition. In Archaeology on the Great Plains, edited by W Raymond Wood, pp. 235–268. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Stephens, Denzil 1974 Excavations at the Stoner and Lowe Sites. Papers in Anthropology No. 2. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alan P., and Rozen, Ken C. 1985 Debitage Analysis and Archaeological Interpretation. American Antiquity 50:755–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teltser, Patrice A. 1991 Generalized Core Technology and Tool Use: A Mississippian Example. Journal of Field Archaeology 18:363–375.Google Scholar
Thomas, David Hurst 1978 Arrowheads and Darts: How the Stones got the Shaft. American Antiquity 43:461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Victor D., and Turck, John A. 2009 Adaptive Cycles of Coastal Hunter-Gatherers. American Antiquity 74:255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrence, Robin 1983 Time Budgeting and Hunter-gatherer Technology. In Hunter-Gatherer Economy in Prehistory: A European Perspective, edited by Geoff Bailey, pp. 11–22. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Torres, John A. 2000 Changing Lithic Technology During the Basketmaker-Pueblo Transition: Evidence from the Anasazi Heartland. In Foundations of Anasazi: The Basketmaker-Pueblo Transition, edited by Paul F. Reed, pp. 221–229. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Turnbow, Christopher A. 1997 Projectile Points as Chronological Indicators. In OLE (Volume II: Artifacts), edited by John C. Acklen, pp. 161–230. Public Service Company of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Turner, Ellen Sue, and Hester, Thomas R. 1999 A Field Guide to Stone Artifacts of Texas Indians. Gulf Publishing, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Van Buren, G. E. 1974 Arrowheads and Projectile Points with a Classification Guide for Lithic Artifacts. Arrowhead Publishing, Garden Grove, California.Google Scholar
Van Hoose, Jonathan E., and Lundquist, Lance 2002 Prehistoric Lithic Artifacts. In Across the Desert Floor: Cultural Resource Investigations along US 54, Otero County, New Mexico, edited by Jim A. Railey, pp. 577–651. New Mexico Highway and Transportation Department, Cultural Resource Technical Series 2002-1. TRC and Taschek Environmental Consultants, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
VanPool, Todd L. 2006 The Survival of Archaic Technology in an Agricultural World: How the Atlatl and Dart Endured in the North American Southwest. Kiva 71(4):429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vierra, Bradley J. 2005 Late Archaic Stone Tool Technology Across the Borderlands. In The Late Archaic Across the Borderlands, edited by Bradley Vierra, pp. 187–218. University of Texas Press, Austin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, William S. 1946 Indian Knoll, Site Oh2, Ohio County, Kentucky. Reports in Anthropology and Archaeology, Volume 4, No. 3, Part 1. University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
Webster, Gary S. 1980 Recent Data Bearing on the Question of the Origins of the Bow and Arrow in the Great Basin. American Antiquity 45:63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, John C. 2005 Weapon Trials: The Atlatl and Experiments in Hunting Technology. Electronic document, http://www.worl-datlatl.org/Articles/Atlatl%20Experiments.pdf, accessed March 9, 2009.Google Scholar
Whittaker, John C. 2007 Late Survival of Atlatls in the American Southwest? The Atlatl 20(1):10–11.Google Scholar
Whittaker, John C., and Kaldahl, Eric J. 2001 Where the Waste Went: A Knappers’ Dump at Grasshopper Pueblo. In Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning, edited by William Andrefsky, Jr., pp. 32–60. The University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Winham, R. Peter, and Calabrese, F. A. 1998 The Middle Missouri Tradition. In Archaeology on the Great Plains, edited by W. Raymond Wood, pp. 269–307. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Winters, Howard D. 1967 An Archaeological Survey of the Wabash Valley in Illinois. Report of Investigations No. 10. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Winters, Howard D. 1969 The Riverton Culture. Illinois State Museum, Reports of Investigations No. 13, Springfield.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Regge N. 1996 The Land In Between: Archaic and Formative Occupations along the Upper Rio Hondo of Southeastern New Mexico. Archaeological Notes No. 125. Museum of New Mexico, Office of Archaeological Studies, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Wyckoff, Don G. 1964 The Cultural Sequence of the Packard Site, Mayes County, Oklahoma. Archaeological Site Report, No. 2. Oklahoma River Basin Survey Project, University of Oklahoma Research Institute, Norman.Google Scholar
Wymer, Dee Ann 1992 Trends and Disparities: The Woodland Paleoethnobotanical Record of the Mid-Ohio Valley. In Cultural Variability in Context: Woodland Settlements of the Mid-Ohio Valley, edited by Mark F. Seeman, pp. 65–76. MCJA Special Paper No. 7. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Wymer, Dee Ann 1993 Cultural Change and Subsistence: The Middle Woodland and Late Woodland Transition in the Mid-Ohio Valley. In Foraging and Farming in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by C. Margaret Scarry, pp. 138–156. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Yerkes, Richard W., and Pecora, Albert M. 1991 The Introduction of the Bow and Arrow. In Late Woodland Archaeology at the Parkline Site (46PU99), Putnam County, West Virginia, edited by Charles M. Niquette and Myra A. Hughes, pp. 95–106. Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. Lexington, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Yohe, R. M. II 1998 The Introduction of the Bow and Arrow and Lithic Resource Use at Rose Spring (CA-INY-372). Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 20:26–52.Google Scholar
Young, Lisa C. 1994 Logistic Mobility and Expedient Technology: A Response to Sullivan. Journal of Anthropological Research 50(2):165–167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar