Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:31:49.068Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Hit-and-Run” Archaeology: A Rejoinder to Jett

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert C. Euler
Robert C. Euler*
Affiliation:
Prescott College, Prescott, Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper “Grand Canyon Dam, Split-Twing Figurines, and ‘Hit-and-Run Archaeology,’ ” by Stephen C. Jett, which appeared in the July 1968 number of American Antiquity is replied to relative to the importance of “salvage” as opposed to “hit-and-run” archaeology, the fallacy of assuming archaeological knowledge on the basis of numbers of sites recorded in a region, and the value of proper popularization of archaeological data.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 509 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jett, Stephen 1968 Grand Canyon Dams, Split-Twig Figurines, and “Hit-and-Run” Archaeology. American Antiquity, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 341–51. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar