No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Statistical Device for Comparing Trait Lists
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
A comparison of Adena and Hopewell trait lists by a correlation scatterplot based on the Q technique is offered as an illustration of the use of a descriptive statistic to reduce the degree of similarity between two cultures to an index which defines a point on a dissimilarity-similarity continuum.
- Type
- Facts and Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1961
References
Cole, Fay-Cooper and Deuel, Thorne
1937. Rediscovering Illinois.
University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Deuel, Thorne (Editor) 1952. Hopewellian Communities in Illinois. Scientific Papers of the Illinois State Museum, Vol. 5. Springfield.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B.
1958. The Chronological Position of the Hopewellian Culture in the Eastern United States. Anthropological Papers, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, No. 12. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B. (Editor) 1952. Archeology of Eastern United States.
University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Martin, P. S., Quimby, G. I., and Collier, Donald
1947. Indians Before Columbus.
University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Spaulding, A. C.
1952. The Origin of the Adena Culrure of the Ohio Valley. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 260–8. Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Stephenson, W.
1953. The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and Its Methodology.
University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Webb, W. S. and Baby, R. S.
1957. The Adena People — No. 2.
Ohio State University Press, Columbus.Google Scholar
Webb, W. S. and Snow, C. E.
1945. The Adena People. University of Kentucky Reports in Anthropology and Archaeology, Vol. 6. Lexington.Google Scholar