Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:22:13.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of reduced-tillage cropping systems for sustainable grain production in Maryland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

J.R. Teasdale ,
R.C. Rosecrance ,
C.B. Coffman ,
J.L. Starr ,
I.C. Paltineanu ,
Y.C. Lu  and
B.K. Watkins
J.R. Teasdale*
Affiliation:
Plant Physiologist, USDAARS, Beltsville, MD 20705.
R.C. Rosecrance
Affiliation:
Research Associate, USDAARS, Beltsville, MD 20705.
C.B. Coffman
Affiliation:
Agronomist, USDAARS, Beltsville, MD 20705.
J.L. Starr
Affiliation:
Soil Scientists, USDAARS, Beltsville, MD 20705.
I.C. Paltineanu
Affiliation:
Soil Scientists, USDAARS, Beltsville, MD 20705.
Y.C. Lu
Affiliation:
Economists, USDAARS, Beltsville, MD 20705.
B.K. Watkins
Affiliation:
Economists, USDAARS, Beltsville, MD 20705.
*
Corresponding author is J.R. Teasdale (teasdale@ba.ars.usda.gov).
Get access

Abstract

Sustainable production systems are needed to maintain soil resources and reduce environmental contamination on erodible lands that are incompatible with tillage-intensive operations. A long-term cropping systems comparison was established at Beltsville, Maryland, on a site with 2 to 15% slope to evaluate the efficacy of sustainable strategies compatible with reduced-tillage systems. All systems followed a 2-year rotation of corn the first year and winter wheat followed by soybean the second year. Treatments included (1) no-tillage system with recommended fertilizer and herbicide inputs, (2) crownvetch living mulch system with similar inputs to the no-tillage system, (3) cover crop system including a hairy vetch cover crop before corn and a wheat cover crop before soybean with reduced fertilizer and herbicide inputs, and (4) manure system including crimson clover green manure plus cow manure for nutrient sources, chisel plow/disk for incorporating manure, and rotary hoe plus cultivation for weed control. Results from the initial 4 years demonstrated the relative productivity of these systems. Corn yields were similar in the no-tillage and cover crop systems in each year; both systems averaged 7.8 Mg ha-1 compared to 5.7 Mg ha-1 in both the crownvetch and manure systems. Wheat yields were highest in the manure system in the first 2 years and in the crownvetch system in the last 2 years. Soybean yields were highest in the cover crop system in all years. The manure system usually had lower yields than the highest yielding systems, partly because of competition from uncontrolled weeds. Several measures of the efficiency of grain production were evaluated. The no-tillage system produced the most grain per total vegetative biomass throughout the rotation. The cover crop system produced the most grain per unit of external nitrogen input and, along with the no-tillage system, had the highest corn water-use efficiency. The cover crop system also recycled the most vegetative residues and nutrients of all systems. No single system performed best according to all measures of comparison, suggesting that trade-offs will be required when choosing production systems.

Keywords

corncover cropscrimson clovercrownvetchhairy vetchliving mulchesmanureresiduessoybeanweedswheat
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 79 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Baldock, J., Cunningham, L., Doll, J., Forsythe, D., Griffith, K., Hall, J., Mueller, D., Mulder, T., Posner, J., Saxby, R., and Schmid, J.. 1996. The Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial, Sixth Report. University of Wisconsin, Agronomy Dept., Madison.Google Scholar
2.Clark, A.J., Decker, A.M., Meisinger, J.J., Mulford, F.R., and McIntosh, M.S.. 1995. Hairy vetch kill date effects on soil water and corn production. Agron. J. 87:579–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Decker, A.M., Clark, A.J., Meisinger, J.J., Mulford, F.R., and McIntosh, M.S.. 1994. Legume cover crop contributions to notillage corn production. Agron. J. 86:126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Denton, H.P., and Wagger, M.G.. 1992. Interaction of tillage and soil type on available water in a corn-wheat-soybean rotation. Soil Tillage Res. 23:27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Dick, W.A., McCoy, E.L., Edwards, W.M., and Lal, R.. 1991. Continuous application of no-tillage to Ohio soils. Agron. J. 83:65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Drinkwater, L.E., Letourneau, D.K., Workneh, F., Van Bruggen, A.H.C., and Shennan, C.. 1995. Fundamental differences between conventional and organic tomato agroeosystems in California. Ecol. Applic. 5:1098–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Drinkwater, L.E., Wagoner, P., and Sarrantonio, M.. 1998. Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature 396:262–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Fawcett, R.S., Christensen, B.R., and Tierney, D.P.. 1994. The impact of conservation tillage on pesticide runoff into surface water: A review and analysis. J. Soil Water Conserv. 49:126–135.Google Scholar
9.Frederick, J.R., and Bauer, P.J.. 1996. Winter wheat responses to surface and deep tillage on the southeastern Coastal Plain. Agron. J. 88:829–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Hall, J.K., Hartwig, N.L., and Hoffman, L.D.. 1984. Cyanazine losses in runoff from no-tillage corn in “living” and dead mulches vs. unmulched, conventional tillage. J. Environ. Qual. 13:105–110.Google Scholar
11.Hammel, J.E. 1995. Long-term tillage and crop rotation effects on winter wheat production in northern Idaho. Agron. J. 87:16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hanson, J.C., Lichtenberg, E., and Peters, S.E.. 1997. Organic versus conventional grain production in the mid-Atlantic: An economic and farming system overview. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 12:2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Harris, G.H., Hesterman, O.B., Paul, E.A., Peters, S.E., and Janke, R.R.. 1994. Fate of legume and fertilizer nitrogen-15 in a long-term cropping systems experiment. Agron. J. 86:910–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Isensee, A.R., Nash, R.G., and Helling, C.S.. 1990. Effect of conventional vs. notillage on pesticide leaching to shallow groundwater. J. Environ. Qual. 19:434–440.Google Scholar
15.Isensee, A.R., and Sadeghi, A.M.. 1993. Impact of tillage practice on runoff and pesticide transport. J. Soil Water Conserv. 48:523–527.Google Scholar
16.Johnson, R.R. 1994. Influence of no-till on soybean cultural practices. J. Prod. Agric. 7:43–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Karlen, D.L., Wollenhaupt, N.C., Erbach, D.C., Berry, E.C., Swan, J.B., Eash, N.S., and Jordahl, J.L.. 1994. Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10 years of no-till corn. Soil Tillage Res. 31:149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.King, L.D., and Buchanan, M.. 1993. Reduced chemical input cropping systems in the southeastern United States. I. Effect of rotations, green manure crops and nitrogen fertilizer on crop yields. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 8:58–77.Google Scholar
19.Liebhardt, W.C., Andrews, R.W., Culik, M.N., Harwood, R.R., Janke, R.R., Radke, J.K., and Rieger-Schwartz, S.L.. 1989. Crop production during conversion from conventional to low-input methods. Agron. J. 81:150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Lu, Y., Watkins, B., and Teasdale, J.. 1999. Economic analysis of sustainable agricultural cropping systems for mid-Atlantic states. J. Sustainable Agric. 15:77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Mahboubi, A.A., Lal, R., and Faussey, N.R.. 1993. Twenty-eight years of tillage effects on two soils in Ohio. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 57:506–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Pallant, E., Lansky, D.M., Rio, J.E., Jacobs, L.D., Schuler, G.E., and Whimpenny, W.G.. 1997. Growth of corn roots under low-input and conventional farming systems. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 12:173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Paltineanu, I.C., and Starr, J.L.. 1997. Real-time soil water dynamics using multisensor capacitance probes: Laboratory calibration. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 61:1576–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Serotkin, N., and Tibbets, S.. (eds.). 1999. Cover crops and conservation tillage for erosion control on crop land. Penn State Agronomy Guide 1999–2000. Pennsylvania State University Extension Service, University Park. p. 211–231.Google Scholar
25.Shipitalo, M.J., Edwards, W.M., and Owens, L.B.. 1997. Herbicide losses in runoff from conservation-tilled watersheds in a corn-soybean rotation. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 61:267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Smil, V. 1999. Crop residues: Agriculture's largest harvest—Crop residues incorporate more than half of the world's agricultural phytomass. BioScience 49:299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Smolik, J.D., and Dobbs, T.L.. 1991. Crop yields and economic returns accompanying the transition to alternative farming systems. J. Prod. Agric. 4:153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Starr, J.L., and Paltineanu, I.C.. 1998. Soil water dynamics using multisensor capacitance probes in nontraffic interrows of corn. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 62:114–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Stinner, B.R., Odum, E.P., and Crossley, D.A. Jr., 1983. Nutrient uptake by vegetation in relation to other ecosystem processes in conventional tillage, no-tillage and old-field systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 10:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Teasdale, J.R. 1998. Cover crops, smother plants, and weed management. In Hatfield, J.L., Buhler, D.D., and Stewart, B.A. (eds.). Integrated Weed and Soil Management. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI. p. 247–270.Google Scholar
31.Temple, S.R., Somasco, O.A., Kirk, M., and Friedman, D.. 1994. Conventional, low-input and organic farming systems compared. California Agric. 48(5):14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar