Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:37:05.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Support in New England for certification and labelling of produce grown using integrated pest management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Craig S. Hollingsworth ,
M. J. Paschall ,
Nancy L. Cohen  and
William M. Coli
Craig S. Hollingsworth
Affiliation:
Extension Specialists, Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003.
M. J. Paschall
Affiliation:
Currently a graduate student at the School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514.
Nancy L. Cohen
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Nutrition, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
William M. Coli
Affiliation:
Extension Specialists, Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003.
Get access

Abstract

We surveyed a total of 549 Cooperative Extension clientele (consumers), farmstand owners, and food industry representatives in New England to assess the potential for certification and labelling of produce grown using integrated pest management (IPM). The survey elicited self-reported knowledge of IPM, perceptions of current pesticide use and IPM, and attitudes toward certification and labelling of produce as “IPMGrown.” The respondents expressed widespread support for certification and labelling of produce grown using IPM. Potential barriers to the marketing of IPM-labelled produce were also revealed. The survey showed the need for education to inform the public about pest management in agriculture and to build confidence in the safety of our food supply.

Keywords

IPM-labelled producealternative pest controlconsumer perceptions
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 78 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Beamer, B.J., and Preston, W.P.. 1991. Shelf space allocation in the produce department: Implications for marketing specialty produce. J. Food Distribution Research 22(2):23–35.Google Scholar
2.Burgess, R., Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Shelton, A., and Tette, J.. 1989. Results of IPM marketing survey. Proceedings of the 51st Annual New York Pest Management Conference. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
3.Coli, W.M. 1990. A report on University of Massachusetts cooperative extension integrated pest management (IPM) programs, 1989. Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
4.Dillman, D.A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, NY.Google Scholar
5.Food Marketing Institute. 1990. Trends: Consumer attitudes and the supermarket 1990. Conducted by Opinion Research Corporation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
6.Grant, J., Tette, J., Petzoldt, C., and Kovach, J.. 1990. Feasibility of an IPMgrower recognition program in New York state. IPM No. 3. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
7.Grieshop, J., Zalom, F., and Miyao, G.. 1988. Adoption and diffusion of integrated pest management innovations in agriculture. Bull. Entomological Soc. America 34:72–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Grocery Industry Directory of New England and Albany (1989–1990). Griffin Publishing Co., South Weymouth, MA.Google Scholar
9.Hollingsworth, C.S., Coli, W.M., Cooley, D.R., and Prokopy, R.J.. 1992a. Massachusetts integrated pest management guidelines for apple. Fruit Notes. Univ. of Massachusetts Cooperative Extension 57(4):12–16.Google Scholar
10.Hollingsworth, C.S., Schloemann, S.G., Cooley, D.R., and Else, M.J.. 1992b. Massachusetts integrated pest management guidelines for strawberry. Fruit Notes. Univ. of Massachusetts Cooperative Extension 57(4):17–20.Google Scholar
11.Jolly, D.A., and Norris, K.. 1991. Marketing prospects for organic and pesticide-free produce. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 6(4):174–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Jolly, D.A., Schutz, H.G., Diaz-Knauf, K.V., and Johal, J.. 1989. Organic foods: Consumer attitudes and use. Food Technology 43(11):60–66.Google Scholar
13.Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J., and Tette, J.. 1992. A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York Food & Life Sciences Bull. No. 139. N.Y. State Agric. Exp. Sta., Geneva, NY.Google Scholar
14.Newsome, R. 1990. Organically grown foods: A scientific status summary by the Institute of Food Technologists' expert panel on food safety and nutrition. Food Technology 44(12):123–130.Google Scholar
15.Ott, S.L., Huang, C.L., and Misra, S.K.. 1991. Consumers' perception of risk from pesticide residues and demands for certification of residue-free produce. In Caswell, J.A. (ed). Economics of Food Safety. Elsevier, New York, NY. pp. 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Prokopy, R.J. 1990. Future challenges to apple pest management. IPM Practitioner 12 (9):1–4.Google Scholar
17.Prokopy, R.J., Coli, W.M., Hislop, R.G., and Hauschild, K.I.. 1980. Integrated management of insect and mite pests in commercial apple orchards in Massachusetts. J. Economic Entomology 73:529–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Rajotte, E.G., Kazmierczak, R.F., and Lambur, M.T.. 1986. The national evaluation of extension's integrated pest management (IPM) programs. Virginia Cooperative Extension Service, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
19.Sachs, C., Blair, D., and Richter, C.. 1987. Consumer pesticide concerns: A 1965 and 1984 comparison. J. Consumer Affairs 21:96–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.SAS. 1985. SAS Procedures Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
21.Warren, V. 1990. Beliefs about food supply safety: A study of cooperative extension clientele. J. Amer. Dietetic Assoc. 90:713–714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed