Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:15:14.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organic versus conventional grain production in the mid-Atlantic: An economic and farming system overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

James C. Hanson ,
Erik Lichtenberg  and
Steven E. Peters
James C. Hanson
Affiliation:
Associate Professors, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742;
Erik Lichtenberg
Affiliation:
Associate Professors, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742;
Steven E. Peters
Affiliation:
Agricultural Planning Associate, Seeds of Change, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Get access

Abstract

A farming systems trial has been conducted at the Rodale Institute Research Center in Kutztown, Pennsylvania since 1981. Over time, the organic rotation has changed to reflect improved knowledge and experience. The current, three-year rotation (hairy vetch/corn, rye/soybeans, and wheat) focuses on mechanical tillage for weed control and year-round live plant cover for pest control and nutrient supply. We constructed long-term enterprise budgets for the organic and conventional cash grain rotations and compared returns earned during the first years of the study, which for the organic rotation involved investment in soil capital, with returns during two later 5-year periods. The organic rotations during these two later periods produced com and soybean yields comparable with the conventional rotation, but grew higher-value crops less frequently and required more family labor and management. The differences in the profitability of the conventional and organic farming systems depend on whether the analysis includes the initial investment in building up the soil and the value of family labor.

Keywords

sustainable agricultureorganic grain productiontransition costs
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 2 - 9
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Chambers, R.G., and Lichtenberg, E.. 1995. Economics of transition to sustainable farming in the mid-Atlantic. Annual Report to EPA. Univ. of Mary-land, College Park.Google Scholar
2.Chesapeake Bay Program. 1992. Nutrient Reduction in the Chesapeake Bay. 1991 Progress Report. Annapolis, Maryland.Google Scholar
3.Culik, M.N., and Liebhardt, W.C.. 1984. Conversion Project Progress Report. Rodale Research Center, Kutztown, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
4.Dabbert, S., and Madden, P.. 1986. The transition to organic agriculture: A multi-year model of a Pennsylvania farm. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 1:99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Doane's Agricultural Reports. 1992. Machinery operating costs, 1992. Vol 55, No. 15–5, 04 10. St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
6.Domanico, J.L., Madden, P., and Partenheimer, E.J.. 1986. Income effects of limiting soil erosion under organic, conventional and no-till systems in eastern Pennsylvania. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 1:75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Duffy, M., Guider, G., and Nicholson, S.. 1989. An economic analysis of the Rodale Conversion Project: Overview. Staff Paper No. 212. Dept. of Economics, Iowa State Univ., Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
8.Fox, G., Weersink, A., Sarwar, G., Duff, S., and Deen, B.. 1991. Comparative economics of alternative agricultural production systems. Northeastern J. Agric. and Resource Economics 20:124–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Francis, C., and Youngberg, G.. 1990. Sustainable agriculture—An overview. In Francis, C.A., Flora, C.B., and King, L.D. (eds). Sustainable Agriculture in Temperate Zones. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
10.Hanson, J.C., Johnson, D.M., Peters, S.E., and Janke, R.R.. 1990. The profitability of sustainable agriculture on a representative grain farm in the mid-Atlantic region, 1981–89. Northeast J. Agric, and Resource Economics 19:90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hanson, J.C., Weber, L., Davis, M., Kelly, T., and Kroll, K.. 1996. Sustainable agriculture in the mid-Atlantic. Working Paper 96–13. Dept. of Agric, and Resource Economics, Univ. of Mary-land, College Park.Google Scholar
12.Harwood, R.R. 1984. Organic farming research at the Rodale Research Center. In Bezdicek, D.F. and Power, J.F. (eds). Organic Fanning: Current Technology and Its Role in a Sustainable Agriculture. Spec. Pub. No. 46. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
13.Harwood, R.R. 1990. A history of sustainable agriculture. In Edwards, C.A., Lal, R., Madden, P., Miller, R.H., and House, G. (eds). Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Soil and Water Conservation Soc., Ankeny, Iowa.Google Scholar
14.Just, R.E., and Bockstael, N. (eds). 1991. Commodity and Resource Policies in Agriculture. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Karlen, D.L., Duffy, M.D., and Colvin, T.S.. 1995. Nutrient, labor, energy, and economic evaluations of two farming systems in Iowa. J. Production Agric. 8:540–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Kay, R.D., and Edwards, W.M.. 1994. Farm Management. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
17.Lee, L.K. 1992. A perspective on the economic impacts of reducing agricultural chemical use. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 7:82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Lichtenberg, E. 1992. Alternative approaches to pesticide regulation. Northeast J. Agric. and Resource Economics 21:83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.National Research Council. 1986. Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
20.National Research Council. 1989. Alternative Agriculture. Board on Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
21.Northwest Area Foundation. 1994. A Better Row to Hoe. St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
22.Office of Technology Assessment. 1995. Biologically Based Technologies for Pest Control. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
23.Peters, S. 1991. Organic and conventional cropping beyond transition. Organic Farmer 2:13–18.Google Scholar
24.Peters, S., Janke, R., and Bohlke, M.. 1992. Rodale's Farming Systems Trial: 1986–1990. Research Report. Rodale Institute Research Center, Kutztown, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
25.Russell, C., and Shogren, J. (eds). 1994. Management of Nonpoint-Source Pollution. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Norwell, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
26.Smolik, J.D., Dobbs, T. L., and Rickerl, D.H.. 1995. The relative sustainability of alternative, conventional, and reduced-till fanning systems. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 10:25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.U.S. Congress. 1990. Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
28.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Another Look: National Survey of Pesticides in Drinking Water Wells, Phase II Report. EPA 579/09-91-020. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar