Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:44:55.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Profile of organic dairy farming in Ontario

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Yetunde O. Sholubi ,
D. Peter Stonehouse  and
E. Ann Clark
Yetunde O. Sholubi
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.
D. Peter Stonehouse
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.
E. Ann Clark
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Crop Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.
Get access

Abstract

Eight dairy farms located in western Ontario were surveyed as part of an ongoing comparative economic study. The sampled farms had been using organic methods for an average of 5.5 y ears and, therefore, were beyond the “transition” stage. Diversified cropping systems were characteristic of these farms, with most crop products (grain and straw) being used directly by the farms' livestock enterprises. Crop rotations were complex, and generally involved sequences of forages and small grains into which cover crops such as oilseed radish and red clover were integrated. Weed control, year-round soil cover, and production of feed and bedding all contributed to the design of cropping systems. Both solid and liquid manures were composted before application. No feed additives or growth hormones were used, but homeopathic remedies, probiotics, and antibiotics were commonly used. The high cost of synthetic fertilizer and concern for the environment were the main reasons given by the f armers f or adopting organic methods.

Keywords

organic farmingcrop rotationforagehayprofitabilitypasturesmall grains
Type
Other Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 133 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Barker, A.V. 1975. Organic versus inorganic nutrition and horticultural crop quality. Hortscience 10:50–54.Google Scholar
2.Briggs, D.J., and Courtney, E.M.. 1989. Agriculture and Environment. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, England.Google Scholar
3.Carey, A.E. 1991. Agriculture, agricultural chemicals, and water quality. In Agriculture and the Environment. 1991 Yearbook of Agriculture. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. pp. 78–85.Google Scholar
4.Carnevale, R.A., Johnson, W.A., Reed, C.A., and Post, A.. 1991. Agricultural chemical residues in food: Evaluating the risks. In Agriculture and the Environment. 1991 Yearbook of Agriculture. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. pp. 217–223.Google Scholar
5.Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. 1980. Organic and conventional farming compared. Report No. 84. Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
6.Crew, T.E., Mohler, C.L., and Power, A.G.. 1991. Energetics and ecosystems integrity: The defining principles of sustainable agriculture. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 6:146–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Duda, A.M., and Johnson, R.J.. 1985. Cost effective targeting of agricultural nonpoint-source pollution controls. J.Soil and Water Conservation 40:108–111.Google Scholar
8.Faeth, P., Repetto, R., Kroll, K., Dai, Q., and Helmers, G.. 1991. Paying the Farm Bill: U.S. Agricultural Policy and the Transition to Sustainable Agriculture. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
9.Fleming, M.H. 1987. Agricultural chemicals in ground-water: Preventing contamination by removing barriers against low-input farm management. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 2:124–130.Google Scholar
10.Frey, K.J., Keim, W.F., and Nielsen, D.R.. 1984. In Bezdicek, D.F. and Power, J.F. (eds). Organic Farming: Current Technology and Its Role in a Sustainable Agriculture. ASA Spec. Pub. No. 42. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Crop Sci. Soc. Amer., and Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Madison, Wisconsin, p. v.Google Scholar
11.Fulkerson, R.S. 1983. Protein supplement from forage legumes. Factsheet. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
12.Gantzer, C.J., Anderson, S.H., Thompson, A.L., and Brown, J.R.. 1990. Estimating soil erosion after 100 years of cropping on Sanborn Field. J. Soil and Water Conservation 45:641–644.Google Scholar
13.Gray, K.R., and Biddlestone, A.J.. 1981. The composting of agricultural wastes. In Stonehouse, B. (ed). Biological Husbandry: A Scientific Approach to Organic Farming. Butterworths, London, England, pp. 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Heichel, G.H. 1987. Legume nitrogen: symbiotic fixation and recovery by subsequent crops. In Energy in World Agriculture Handbook. Vol. II. Energy in Plant Nutrition and Pest Control. Elsevier Scientific Pub., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
15.Karanja, G.M. 1994. Composted versus stacked cattle manure on Ontario farms. M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Crop Science, Univ. of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
16.Koepf, H.H. 1981. The principles and practice of biodynamic agriculture. In Stonehouse, B. (ed). Biological Husbandry: A Scientific Approach to Organic Farming. Butterworths, London, England, pp. 237–250.Google Scholar
17.Macey, A. 1992. Organic field crop handbook: A project of Canadian organic growers. Canadian Organic Growers Inc., Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
18.Molder, P.J., Negrave, P.D., and Schoney, R.A.. 1991. Descriptive analysis of Saskatchewan organic producers. Canadian J. Agric. Economics 39:891–899.Google Scholar
19.IIIMoore, B., Gildea, M.P., Vorosmarty, C.J., Skole, D.L., Melillo, J.M., Peterson, B.J., Rastetter, E.B., and Steudler, P.A.. 1989. Biogeochemical cycles. In Rambler, M.B., Margulis, L., and Fester, R. (eds). Global Ecology. Towards a Science of the Biosphere. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 113–114.Google Scholar
20.Moxley, J. 1989. Survey of pesticide use in Ontario, 1988. Economics and Policy Coordination Branch, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
21.National Research Council. 1989. Alternative Agriculture. Board on Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
22.OMAF. 1982–1992. Agricultural Statistics for Ontario. Pub. 20. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
23.OMAF. 1993. Ontario Dairy Farm Accounting Project (ODFAP) Annual Summary, 1992. Agriculture Canada, Ontario Milk Marketing Board, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, and Univ. of Guelph.Google Scholar
24.Paoletti, M.G., and Pimentel, D. (eds). 1992. Biotic Diversity in Agroecosystems. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
25.Papendick, R.I., Elliott, L.F., and Dahlgren, R.B.. 1986. Environmental consequences of modern production agriculture: How can alternative agriculture address these issues and concerns? Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 1:3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Parr, J.F., Papendick, R.I., Youngberg, I.G., and Meyer, R.E.. 1990. Sustainable agriculture in the United States. In Edwards, C.A., Lai, R., Madden, P., Miller, R.H., and House, G. (eds). Sustainable Agricultural Systems. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, Iowa, pp. 50–67.Google Scholar
27.Pfeiffer, E. 1983. Bio-Dynamic Gardening and Farming. Mercury Press, Spring Valley, New York.Google Scholar
28.Pimentel, D., Allen, J., Beers, A., Guinand, L., Linder, R., McLauglin, P., Meer, B., Musonda, D., Perdue, D., Poisson, S., Siebert, S., Stoner, K., Salazar, R., and Hawkins, A.. 1987. World agriculture and soil erosion. Bioscience 37:277–283.Google Scholar
29.Pimentel, D., Acquay, H., Biltonen, M., Rice, P., Silva, M., Nelson, J., Lipner, V., Giordano, S., Horowitz, A., and D'Amore, M.. 1993. Environmental and social costs of pesticides. In Pimente, D. and Lehman, H. (eds). The Pesticide Question: Environment, Economics, and Ethics. Chapman and Hall, New York, N.Y. pp. 47–84.Google Scholar
30.Rayburn, E.D. 1993. Potential ecological and environmental effects of pasture and BGH technology. In Liebhardt, W.C. (ed). The Dairy Debate: Consequences of Bovine Growth Hormone and Rotational Grazing Technologies. Sustainable Agricultural Research and Education Program, Univ. of California, Davis, pp. 247–276.Google Scholar
31.Reganold, J.P., Elliott, L.F., and Unger, Y.L.. 1987. Long-term effects of organic and conventional farming on soil erosion. Nature 330:370–372.Google Scholar
32.Stanhill, G. 1990. The comparative productivity of organic agriculture. Agric., Ecosystems and Environment 30:1–26.Google Scholar
33.Stevenson, F.J. 1982. Origin and distribution of N in the soil. In Stevenson, F. J. (ed). Nitrogen in Agriculture Soils. Agronomy Monograph No. 22. Amer. Soc. Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
34.Stonehouse, O.P., Gill, R.S., Weise, S.F., and Swanton, C.J.. 1993. Economic comparison of farming systems with alternative weed management strategies: A case study approach. Technical Bulletin AEB92/04. Dept. of Agric. Economics and Business, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
35.Surgeoner, G.Q., and Grieve, D.O.. 1994. Improving efficiencies in dairy cow production 1951–1991. Agri-food Research in Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
36.U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. 1980. Report and Recommendations on Organic Farming. USDA Study Team on Organic Farming. U.S Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
37.Zinn, J., and Blodgett, J.. 1994. Agriculture meets the environment: Communicating perspectives. J. Soil and Water Conservation 49:136–143.Google Scholar