Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:17:13.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil crusting in relation to global soil degradation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

Malcolm E. Sumner  and
William P. Miller
Malcolm E. Sumner
Affiliation:
Regents' Professor, Department of Agronomy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
William P. Miller
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Get access

Abstract

The formation of crusts or seals at the soil surface is exceedingly important in determining how much rainfall infiltrates into the soil and how much runs off, causing soil erosion. This paper explores the processes involved in the formation of crusts, such as raindrop impact and clay dispersion, to formulate a picture of the mechanisms involved. We discuss the major consequences of crusting, namely, runoff, erosion, and impaired seedling emergence, and present strategies to reduce soil degradation. Examples are offered from many parts of the world.

Keywords

dispersible clayinfiltrationrunofferosion
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 7 , Issue 1-2: Special Issue on Soil Quality , June 1992 , pp. 56 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bruce, R.R., Langdale, G.W. and West, L.T.. 1990. Modification of soil characteristics of degraded soil surfaces by biomass input and tillage affecting soil water regime. Trans. 14th Int. Congress of Soil Science 6:4–9.Google Scholar
2.Chartres, C., and Oades, J.M.. 1992. Crusting in Australia. In Sumner, M.E. and Stewart, B.A. (eds). Soil Crusting: Chemical and Physical Processes. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan.Google Scholar
3.Gupta, S.C., Moncrief, J.F., and Ewing, R.P.. 1992. Soil crusting in the Midwestern United States. In Sumner, M.E. and Stewart, B.A. (eds). Soil Crusting: Chemical and Physical Processes. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan.Google Scholar
4.Kazman, S., Shainberg, I., and Gal, M.. 1983. Effect of low levels of exchangeable Na and applied phosphogypsum on the infiltration rate of various soils. Soil Sci. 135:184–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Kemper, W.D., and Miller, D.E.. 1974. Management of crusting soils: Some practical possibilities. Arizona Agric. Exp. Sta. Technical Bull. 214:1–6.Google Scholar
6.Keren, R. 1989. Water-drop kinetic energy effect on water infiltration in calcium and magnesium soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 53:1624–1628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Levy, G.J., and van der Watt, H.v H.. 1990. Effect of exchangeable potassium on the hydraulic conductivity and infiltration rate of some South African soils. Soil Sci. 149:69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Levy, G.J., van der Watt, H.v H., and du Plessis, H.M.. 1988. Effect of Na/Mg and Na/Ca systems on soil hydraulic conductivity and infiltration. Soil Sci. 146:303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Luk, S.H., Dubbin, W.E., and Mermut, A.R.. 1990. Fabric analysis of surface crusts developed under simulated rainfall on loess soils, China. Catena Supplement 17:29–40.Google Scholar
10.McIntyre, D.S. 1958. Soil splash and the formation of soil crusts by raindrop impact. Soil Sci. 85:261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Miller, D.E., and Gifford, R.O.. 1974. Modification of soil crusts for plant growth. Arizona Agric. Exp. Sta. Technical Bull. 214:7–16.Google Scholar
12.Miller, W.P. 1987. Infiltration and soil loss of three gypsum-amended Ultisols under simulated rainfall. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 51:1314–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Miller, W.P., and Baharuddin, M.K.. 1986. Relationship of soil dispersibility to infiltration and erosion of southeastern soils. Soil Sci. 142:235–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Miller, W.P. and Radcliffe, D.E.. 1992. Soil crusting in the Southeastern United States. In Sumner, M.E. and Stewart, B.A. (eds). Soil Crusting: Chemical and Physical Processes. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan.Google Scholar
15.Miller, W.P., and Scifres, J.. 1988. Effect of sodium nitrate and gypsum on infiltration and erosion of a highly weathered soil. Soil Sci. 145:304–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Miller, W.P., Truman, C.C., and Langdale, G. W.. 1988. Influence of previous erosion on crusting behavior of Cecil soils. J. Soil and Water Conservation 43:338–341.Google Scholar
17.Miller, W.P., Sumner, M.E., and Kim, K-H.. 1991. Chemical amelioration of surface crusting to reduce runoff and erosion on highly weathered soils. Soil Technology 4:319–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Norton, L.D. 1987. Micromorphological study of surface seals developed under simulated rainfall. Geoderma 40:127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Raney, W.A. 1953. Soil aggregate stabilizers. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. of Amer. 17:76–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Roth, C.H. 1992. Soil crusting in South America. In Sumner, M.E. and Stewart, B.A. (eds). Soil Crusting: Chemical and Physical Processes. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan.Google Scholar
21.Roth, C.H., Frede, H.G., and Derpsch, R.. 1986. Effect of different soybean tillage systems on infiltrability and erosion susceptibility of an Oxisol in Parana, Brazil. Zeitschrift für Ackerund Pflanzenbau 157:217–226.Google Scholar
22.Roth, C.H., Frede, H.G., and Derpsch, R.. 1988. Effect of mulch rates and tillage systems on infiltrability and other soil physical properties of an Oxisol in Parana, Brazil. Soil Tillage Research 11:81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Roth, C.H., Wolczynski, W., and Fihlo, C. Castro. (in press). Results on the effects of tillage and liming on organic matter composition of a Rhodic Ferrasol from Southern Brazil. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde.Google Scholar
24.Ruehrwein, R.A., and Ward, D.W.. 1952. Mechanisms of clay aggregation by polyelectrolytes. Soil Sci. 73:485–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Shainberg, I. 1992. Chemical and mineralogical components of crusting. In Sumner, M.E. and Stewart, B.A. (eds). Soil Crusting: Chemical and Physical Processes. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan.Google Scholar
26.Shainberg, I., Sumner, M.E., Miller, W.P., Farina, M.P.W., Pavan, M.A., and Fey, M.V.. 1989. Use of gypsum on soils: A review. Advances in Soil Sci. 9:1–111.Google Scholar
27.Shainberg, I., Warrington, D., and Rengasamy, P.. 1990. Water quality and PAM interactions in reducing surface sealing. Soil Sci. 149:301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Singer, M.J., and Warrington, D.N.. 1992. Crusting in the Western United States. In Sumner, M.E. and Stewart, B.A. (eds). Soil Crusting: Chemical and Physical Processes. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan.Google Scholar
29.Sumner, M.E. 1992. The electrical double layer and clay dispersion. In Sumner, M.E. and Stewart, B.A. (eds). Soil Crusting: Chemical and Physical Processes. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan.Google Scholar
30.Sumner, M.E., and Stewart, B.A. (eds). 1992. Soil crusting: Chemical and Physical and Processes. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan.Google Scholar
31.Tisdall, J.M., and Oades, J.M.. 1982. Organic matter and water-stable aggregates. J. Soil Sci. 33:141–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Uehara, G., and Jones, R.C.. 1974. Bonding mechanisms for soil crusts: Particle surfaces and cementing agents. Arizona Agric. Exp. Sta. Technical Bull. 214:17–28.Google Scholar
33.van der Watt, H.v H., and Claassens, A.S.. 1990. Effect of surface treatments on soil crusting and infiltration. Soil Technology 3:241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.van der Watt, H.v H., and Valentin, C.. 1992. Soil crusting: The African view. In Sumner, M.E. and Stewart, B.A. (eds). Soil Crusting: Chemical and Physical Processes. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan.Google Scholar