Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:16:55.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of fabric and compost mulches for vegetable production in a low tillage, permanent bed system: Effects on crop yield and labor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

R.S. Feldman ,
C.E. Holmes  and
T.A. Blomgren
R.S. Feldman*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Science, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601-1387
C.E. Holmes
Affiliation:
Former undergraduate student, Department of Environmental Science, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601-1387;
T.A. Blomgren
Affiliation:
Regional Vegetable Specialist, Cornell Cooperative Extension, 90 State Street, Albany, NY 12207.
*
Corresponding author is R.S. Feldman (richard.feldman@marist.edu).
Get access

Abstract

We tested the usefulness of mulching with polypropylene landscape fabric and compost as alternatives to bare soil for growing red cabbage and watermelon. Polypropylene landscape fabric has features similar to the polyethylene film that is popular for commercial vegetable production, but its durability permits multi-year use, which would reduce excessive waste produced from the typical single-season use of polyethylene film. On the other hand, compost used as mulch enhances soil development while providing weed suppression and water retention, among other benefits. Yields of red cabbage and watermelon were measured for 3 years in plots receiving either 10 cm compost, landscape fabric, or no mulch. Labor associated with crop production and weed suppression was measured as time spent on each task. Cabbage yields over 3 years followed the treatment order of compost > no mulch > fabric, while for melon yields it was compost > fabric > no mulch. Total labor required over 3 years for both crops, according to treatments, was fabric > compost > no mulch. However, labor for the fabric-treated plots dropped sharply after the first year, because fabric was left in place after initial placement. Labor for unmulched cabbage plots increased over time due to weeding and transplanting; labor for unmulched and compost-mulched melon plots increased for the same reasons. Compost provided the highest crop yields with a moderate labor investment. Surface-applied compost substantially increased underlying soil nutrient levels. The study indicates that polypropylene landscape fabric may be a potential alternative to the more traditional polyethylene film for permanent beds in vegetable production.

Keywords

cabbagemulchingorganic mulchespolyethylene filmsynthetic mulcheswatermelonweed control
Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 146 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Blomgren, J. 1999. Permanent Bed Vegetable Production. Final Report, Project FNE96-117. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program, Northeast Region, Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
2.Martin, C.A., Ponder, H.G., and Gilliam, C.H.. 1991. Evaluation of landscape fabric in suppressing growth of weed species. J. Environ. Hort. 9:38–40.Google Scholar
3.Monks, C.D., Monks, D.W., Basden, T., Selders, A., Poland, S., and Rayburn, E.. 1997. Soil temperature, soil moisture, weed control, and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) response to mulching. Weed Technol. 11:561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.NRC (National Research Council). 1989. Alternative Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
5.Pleasant, B. 2000. In celebration of sweet potatoes. Organic Gardening 47(1):32–35.Google Scholar
6.Schales, F.D., and Sheldrake, R. Jr., 1966. Mulch effects on soil conditions and muskmelon response. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 88:425–430.Google Scholar
7.Schonbeck, M.W. 1998. Weed suppression and labor costs associated with organic, plastic, and paper mulches in smallscale vegetable production. J. Sustainable Agric. 13(2):13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Schonbeck, M.W., and Evanylo, G.K.. 1998. Effects of mulches on soil properties and tomato production. I. Soil temperature, soil moisture and marketable yield. J. Sustainable Agric. 13(1):55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Schultz, W. 1983. Matching mulches. Organic Gardening 30:50–55.Google Scholar
10.SPSS. 1997. Advanced Statistics. Vers. 7.5. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
11.Walsh, B.D., Mackenzie, A.F., and Buszard, D.J.. 1996. Soil nitrate levels as influenced by apple orchard floor management systems. Can. J. Soil Sci. 76:343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar