Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:33:03.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What non-land-grant researchers can contribute to agricultural sustainability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

William Lockeretz
William Lockeretz
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Nutrition, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155.
Get access

Abstract

Research on agricultural production has been largely the domain of an institutional system established especially for the purpose. However, the complexities and diverse character of agriculture require diversified modes of research. Such a strategy might be better pursued by a more diversified set of research institutions. Non-land-grant institutions, although lacking the land-grant system's strong experience in agriculture and its close ties with farmers, potentially represent a large pool of scientific expertise in a broad range of fields relevant to agriculture. Also, they are under different institutional constraints, and may be in a better position to do more speculative, long-range research that does not promise immediate practical benefits. Although such research has been criticized by people in the sustainable agriculture movement who believe that research should be more directed at farmers' current problems, a truly sustainable agriculture will require a deeper grasp of how agricultural systems work. Achieving this will demand a breadth of understanding that extends beyond the production-oriented studies that dominate current sustainable agriculture research programs.

Keywords

land-grant systemsustainable agricultureagricultural researchapplied researchon-farm research
Type
Selected Papers from the Conference on Science and Sustainability, Seattle, Washington, October 24–26, 1993
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 9 , Issue 1-2 , June 1994 , pp. 28 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bailey, L.H. 1909. The Training of Farmers. The Century Co., New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
2.Danbom, D.B. 1986. Publicly sponsored agricultural research in the United States from an historical perspective. In Dahlberg, Kenneth A. (ed). New Directions for Agriculture and Agricultural Research. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, New Jersey. pp. 107–131.Google Scholar
3.Danbom, D.B. 1992. Research and agriculture: Challenging the public system. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 7:99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Jordan, W.H. 1908. The authority of science. In Semi-Centennial Celebration of Michigan State Agricultural College. Michigan State Agricultural College, East Lansing, pp. 128–145.Google Scholar
5.Lockeretz, W. 1991. Information requirements of reduced-chemical production methods. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 6:97–103.Google Scholar
6.Lockeretz, W., and Anderson, M.D.. 1993. Agricultural Research Alternatives. Univ. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
7.Mayer, A., and Mayer, J.. 1974. Agriculture, the island empire. Daedalus 103:83–95.Google Scholar
8.Stansbury, D.L. 1986. The context and implications of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Act of 1977. In Dahlberg, K.A. (ed). New Directions for Agriculture and Agricultural Research. Rowman & Allanheld, Totowa, New Jersey, pp. 132–146.Google Scholar
9.Strange, M. 1988. Family Farming: A New Economic Vision. Univ. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, and Institute for Food and Development Policy, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
10.Thornley, K. 1990. Involving farmers in agricultural research: A farmer's perspective. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 5:174–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.USDA-CSRS. 1992. Food and agriculture competitively awarded research and education grants. Fiscal year 1992. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Cooperative State Research Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
12.Watkins, G. 1990. Participatory research: A farmer's perspective. Amer. J. Alternative Agric. 5:161–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar