Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:32:03.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Act of state doctrine—Cuba—government "intervention" of company—intervention distinguished from nationalization—situs of debt asdeterminant in application of act of state doctrine—the law of theUnited States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 62 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 978 - 981
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In some Latin American countries, the central government's emergency powers include intervencidn which enables it to assume control of state or local governments in order to protect the national security or the integrity of such local governments. Intervention may be extended to the control of universities, labor unions, or other private or governmental enterprises. The central government appoints an interventor as its representative who assumes the powers and functions of the intervened organization or institution.—ED.

2 376 U. S. 398 (1964); 58 A.J.I.L. 779 (1964). 3 168 XT. 8. 250 (1897).

4 392 F.2d 706 at 713.

5 Ibid. 714.

6 Quoting 376 TJ. S. 398 at 425.

7 Emphasis supplied by the court.

8 Emphasis and insertion supplied by the court.

9 392 F.2d 706 at 715-716. The court also set aside the summary judgment of the District Court in a companion case concerning the effect of naturalization upon Jorge's claim. Tabacalera Severiano Jorge, S.A. and Severiano Jorge v. Standard Cigar Company, 392 F.2d 716 (5th Cir., March 18, 1968).