Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:46:11.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Institute of International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2017

James Brown Scott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Current Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1923 , pp. 105 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The original resolution was as follows:“ The American Bar Association, at its 45th annual meeting, held in the city of San Francisco, on the 10th dayof August, 1922, expresses the hope that a way may be found by which the government of the United States may avail itself of the permanent Court of International Justice.”Upon the motion of the Honorable William H. Taft, ChiefJustice of the United States,the following clause was added and adopted as an integral part of the resolution:“ an instruction to the committee to formulate such amendments or changes in thestatute which now constitutes the court which, in the judgment of the committee, might make it possible for the United States to accept it.” (Reports of the American Bar Association, Vol. xlvii, 1922, pp. 54-59).