Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:34:43.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Technology Assessment and the United Nations System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Dennis Livingston
Dennis Livingston*
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Panel: The United Nations and Science
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 64 , Issue 4: Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at its Sixty-Fourth Annual Meeting held at New York, N.Y. April 24-26, 1970 , September 1970 , pp. 163 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 National Academy of Engineering [NAE], A Study of Technology Assessment (1969); Library of Congress, Technical Information for Congress (1969); National Academy of Sciences [NAS], Technology; Processes of Assessment and Choice (1969); House Committee on Science and Astronautics, Technology Assessment Seminar and Technology Assessment (1969 and 1970); Kasper (ed.), Technology Assessment— The Proceedings of a Seminar Series (1969); Bauer, Second-Order Consequences: A Methodological Essay on the Impact of Technology (1969); Mayo, et al., The Technology Assessment Function (3 parts) (1968)Google Scholar; Wheeler, , “Bringing Science Under Law,” 2 The Center Magazine 56 (1969)Google Scholar; Wormuth, “Government and Science,” 3 ibid. 41 (1970); Lear, , “Predicting the Consequences of Technology,” 53 Saturday Review 44 (1970)Google Scholar.

2 NAE, op. cit. 1.

3 Kranzberg, “Historical Aspects of Technology Assessment,” in House Committee on Science and Astronautics, Technology Assessment, op. ctt. 380-388.

4 Katz, “Statement,” and Daddario, “The Four Faces of Technology Assessment,” ibid. 173-183 and 376-380.

5 NAS, op. cit. vii-viii, 72-114; NAE, op. cit. 30-36.

6 Lear, loc. cit. 44; New York Times, March 25, 1970, p. 23.

7 Livingston, , “Pollution Control: An International Perspective,” 10 Environment 172 (1968)Google Scholar; Wolman, , “Pollution as an International Issue,” 47 Foreign Affairs 164 (1968)10.2307/20039362CrossRefGoogle Scholar; U.N. Secretary General, Problems of the Human Environment (1969); Kennan, , “To Prevent a World Wasteland: A Proposal,” 48 Foreign Affairs 401 (1970)10.2307/20039452CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Mayo, op. cit. Part I, pp. 3-4; House Committee on Government Operations, Scientific Brain Drain from the Developing Countries (1968); Caryl P. Haskins, The Scientific Revolution and World Politics 17-46 (1964).

9 NAE, op. cit. 25-34.

10 NAS, op. cit. 90-94.

11 House Committee on Science and Astronautics, Earth Resources Satellite System (1969); R. E. Hallgren, , “The World Weather Program,” 8 TRW Space Log 2 (1968)Google Scholar.

12 Bauer (ed.), Social Indicators (1966); Gross (ed.), Social Intelligence for America’s Future: Explorations in Societal Problems (1969).

13 Ayres, Technological Forecasting and Long-Range Planning (1969); Jantsch, Technological Forecasting in Perspective (1967).

14 Senate Committee on Aeronautical and Space Sciences, International Cooperation and Organization for Outer Space 390-399 (1965).