No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Jurisdiction of International Court of Justice under “bilateral treaty— Relation between Anglo-Greek treaty of July 16,1926 and Declaration of same date—No retroactive operation of treaty where no provision to that effect and no special reason
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 April 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Judicial Decisions
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 1952
References
1 It is regretted that the bulk of I.C.J, opinions has made it necessary to depart from the previous practice of giving these opinions in as nearly full form as practicable, and to substitute a digest instead.
2 Consisting of Vice President Guerrero, Acting President; President McNair; Judges Alvarez, Basdevant, Hackworth, Winiarski, Zoričić, IQaestad, Badawi Pasha, Bead, Hsu Mo, Carneiro, Bau, and Armand-Ugon; and Judge ad hoc Spiropoulos. 733
3 Apparently Judge Carneiro and Judge ad hoc Spiropoulos.
4 The judges who gave dissenting opinions.
5 Judges Carneiro and Spiropoulos gave concurring opinions; Judge Alvarez declared that there were “sufficient grounds for holding that the Court has jurisdiction to deal with the merits of the Ambatielos claim“; and Judges McNair, Basdevant, Zoricifi, Elaestad and Hsu Mo gave dissenting opinions.
By order dated July 18, 1952, the International Court of Justice fixed the following time limits for the filing of the reply and rejoinder: October 3, 1952, for the reply of the Greek Government, and January 6, 1953, for the rejoinder of the United Kingdom Government (I.C.J. Eeports, 1952, p. 90).