Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:47:57.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ngai Chi Lam v. Esperdy. 411 F.2d 310

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Alona E. Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , April 1970 , pp. 423 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Sec. 243(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 as amended (8 U.S.C. §1253(a)) provides: “The deportation of an alien in the United States provided for in this Act, or any other Act or treaty, shall be directed by the Attorney General to a country promptly designated by the alien if that country is willing to accept him into its territory, unless the Attorney General, in his discretion, concludes that deportation to such country would be prejudicial to the interests of the United States.” The section provides the Attorney General with a number of alternative destinations if the country of the alien's choice refuses to admit him.

2 Digested in 63 A.J.I.L. 828 (1969).

3 411 F.2d 310 at 311.