No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
1 E.g. Kent v. Dulles, 357 TJ. S. 116 (1958), 53 A.J.I.L. 171 (1959) (freedom to travel is protected by Fifth Amendment and may only be regulated by Congressional act); Zemel v. Eusk, 381 TJ. S. 1 (1965), 59 A.J.I.L. 935 (1965) (Secretary of State may restrict travel to designated areas in the interest of foreign policy); United States V. Laub, 385 TJ. S. 475 (1967), 61 A.J.I.L. 808 (1967) (travel to restricted areas without specially validated passport is not a criminal offense) (court's footnotes omitted).
2 The action began under a regulation which was modified in 1966, 31 Fed. Eeg. 13544 (Oct. 20, 1966), 22 C.KE. §51.74 (1967). As the basic issue was the samo under both regulations, the court did not order a remand of the Lynd case for proceedings under the terms of the new regulation. 389 I\2d 940 at 943.
3 389 F.2d 940 at 943-944.
4 Ibid. 947-948.
5 Ibid. 949.