Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T23:18:32.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEC Efforts to Mitigate Jurisdictional Conflicts Under Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 99 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 493 - 494
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pub. L. No. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745 (2002); see Donaldson, William H., U.S. Capital Markets in the Post–Sarbanes– Oxley World: Why Our Markets Should Matter to Foreign Issuers (January 25, 2005), at <http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch012505whd.htm>>Google Scholar; Norris, Floyd, Watching America: Will It Listen to Foreigners, or Do as It Pleases ? N.Y. Times, Jan. 28, 2005, at C1 Google Scholar.

2 Donaldson, supra note 1.