Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T03:05:19.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soviet Initiatives: U.S. Responses—New Opportunities for Reviving the United Nations System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Thomas M. Franck
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This issue of our Journal highlights “new thinking” by two leading Soviet legal scholars. That, however, is only part of a larger transformation of the climate in which international law and institutions operate. Nowhere has this transformation been more remarkable than at the United Nations.

Type
Editorial Comments
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 83 , Issue 3 , July 1989 , pp. 531 - 543
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 T. Franck, Nation Against Nation 15 (1985).

2 See SC Res. 83 (June 27, 1950); SC Res. 84 (July 7, 1950).

3 Review of the Efficiency of the Administrative and Financial Functioning of the United Nations, UN Doc. A/43/286 (1988).

4 See generally D. P. Moynihan, A Dangerous Place (1978).

5 UN Doc. A/43/629, Annex (1988).

6 See SC Res. 598 (July 20, 1987), reprinted in 26 ILM 1479 (1987).

7 See N.Y. Times, Dec. 14, 1988, at A14, col. 4 (chronology of political history of Angola and South West Africa); id., Nov. 11, 1988, at All, col. 6 (Soviet Union offers to be directly involved in negotiations). See also SC Res. 629 (Jan. 16, 1989); SC Res. 431 (July 27, 1978).

8 The 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide; the 1949 Convention on the Suppression of the Traffic in Persons and of the Exploitation of the Prostitution of Others; the 1952 Convention on the Political Rights of Women; the 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination; the 1979 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women; and the 1984 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. The acceptance applies prospectively to “cases which may arise after the date” of acceptance.