Article contents
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Statute Directing State Department to Record Jerusalem-Born Citizen's Birthplace as "Israel" Does Not Raise Political Question
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012
References
1 Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 104 AJIL 271, 278 (2010)Google Scholar.
2 Zivotofsky v. Clinton, 132 S.Ct. 1421, 1425-26 (2012).
3 Id. at 1430-31; see also Lipták, Adam, Dispute over Jerusalem Engages Court, N.Y. Times, Nov. 8, 2011, at A13Google Scholar; Barnes, Robert, Justices Finda Pile of Issues in Passport Case, Wash. Post, Nov. 8, 2011, at A2Google Scholar; Editorial, President’s Prerogative , 41 ‘Ash. Post, Nov. 10, 2011, at A24Google Scholar; Cushman, John M. Jr., Justices Decline to Say if Jerusalem-Born Americans Can Claim Israeli Birthplace, N.Y. Times, Mar. 27, 2012, at A15 Google Scholar; Courts Can Decide Issue of Israel as Birthpkce, Wash. Post, Mar. 27, 2012, at A6.
4 2 Pub. L. No. 107-228 (2002), 116 Stat. 1350 (codified at 22 U.S.C. §2651 note (2006)).
5 President Bush, George W., Statement on Signing the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, 38 Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc. 1659 (Sept. 30, 2002)Google Scholar.
6 Zivotofsky v. Clinton, 571 F.3d 1227, 1233 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
7 Zivotofiky, 132 S.Ct. at 1425.
8 Id. at 1427-28 (citation omitted).
9 Id. at 1436 (Alito, J., concurring).
10 Id. at 1441 (Breyer, J., dissenting).
- 3
- Cited by