Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:54:18.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The World Court and the Contemporary International Law-Making Process. By Edward McWhinney. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1979. Pp. vii, 219. Index. Dfl.70; $35.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Dana D. Fischer
Dana D. Fischer*
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews and Notes
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , July 1980 , pp. 701 - 702
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lillich and White have suggested the influence of organizational variables on the Court’s jurisprudence. On the basis of interviews with many of the judges, they concluded that the practice during the deliberative process of writing extensive “notes” on a case provides part of the motivation for separate opinions. “Many judges stated frankly that the time invested …naturally engenders a desire to see one’s thoughts in print.” Lillich, & White, , The Deliberative Process of the International Court of Justice: A Preliminary Critique and Some Possible Reforms, 70 AJIL 28, 37 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Rosenne has suggested that the desire of the Court to become involved in the political activities of the United Nations may well be due to some extent to the growing number of individuals elected to the Court “with a long history of personal involvement in UN affairs” and “who by way of experience and intellectual inclination possess an intangible psychological relationship with the UN.” Rosenne, The Composition of the Court, in 1 The Future of the International Court of Justice 388 (Gross ed. 1976).

2 The International Court of Justice, Rules of the Court (1978), reprinted in 73 AJIL 748 (1979), 17 ILM 1285 (1978). Article 95 provides, inter alia,“ a judge who wishes to record his concurrence or dissent without stating his reasons may do so in the form of a declaration.“ Article 107 makes the same provision for the advisory procedure. For a discussion of the expansion of the scope of the declaration in the Court’s practice, see Jhabvala, , Declarations by Judges of the International Court of Justice, 72 AJIL 830 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.