Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:55:06.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American Cases on Nationality and Aliens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , April 1951 , pp. 385 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On “ attachment to principles of the Constitution,” and refusal to bear arms, see Tauchen v. Barber, 183 F. (2d) 266 (Ct. App. 9th, June 30, 1950).

2 Holding that “good moral character” must be shown only for the three-year period of military service when expedited naturalization of an alien soldier takes place under Section 324A of the Nationality Act, see Yuen Jun v. Barber, 184 F. (2d) 491 (Ct. App. 9th, Oct. 4, 1950). In Molsen v. Young, 182 F. (2d) 480 (Ct. App. 5th, May 26, 1950), petitioner’s lack of “attachment to the principles of the Constitution” prior to the five years immediately preceding naturalization was held relevant, but this judgment was vacated and ease remanded to the District Court, 340 TJ. 8. 880 (Nov. 13, 1950).

3 Denaturalization cases included Ackermann v. U. S., 340 U. S. 193 (Dec. 11, 1950); Klapprott v. U. S., 183 F. (2d) 474 (Ct. App. 3d, July 20, 1950); U. S.v. Bridges, 90 F. Supp. 973 (N. D. Calif., June 16, 1950); U. S. v. Zurini, 93 F. Supp. 1 (D. Neb., Oct. 16, 1950).

4 Accord, Kuniyuki v. Acheson, 94 F. Supp. 358 (W. D. Wash., Aug. 24, 1950); see also Acheson v. Ishimaru, 185 F. (2d) 547 (Ct. App. 9th, Dec. 4, 1950).

5 Regarding expatriation by residence abroad, see AcheBon v. Particelli, 184 F. (2d) 938 (Ct. App. 5th, Nov. 3, 1950). On expatriation by marriage to an alien in 1907, and effect of subsequent American naturalization as acquiescence in prior loss of citizenship by such marriage, see In re Riedner, 94 F. Supp. 289 (E. D. Wis., Aug. 25, 1950).

6 Regarding bail in deportation cases, see Warhol v. Shrode, 94 F. Supp. 229 (D. Minn., Oct. 30, 1950); Podolski v. Baird, 94 F. Supp. 294 (E. D. Mich., Nov. 6, 1950); Ex parte Sentner, 94 F. Supp. 77 (E. D. Mo., Nov. 9, 1950); Ex parte Carlson, 94 F. Supp. 18 (S. D. Calif., Nov. 10, 1950); Zydok v. Butterfield, 94 F. Supp. 338 (E. D. Mich., Nov. 10, 1950); IT. S. ex rel. McQuillan v. Delany, 94 F. Supp. 184 (E. D. La., Nov. 16, 1950); U. S. ex rel. Klig v. Shaughnessy, 94 F. Supp. 157 (S. D. N. Y., Nov. 17, 1950). Other procedural questions in deportation arose in Prince v. Mackey, 185 F. (2d) 578 (Ct. App. 9th, Nov. 17, 1950); U. S. ex rel. Wiczynski v. Shaughnessy, 185 F. (2d) 347 (Ct. App. 2d, Nov. 22, 1950); U. S. ex rel. Castro-Louzan v. Zimmerman, 94 F. Supp. 22 (E. D. Pa., Nov. 17,1950).