Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:59:48.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constitution-Making and Transnational Legal Order. Edited by Gregory Shaffer, Tom Ginsburg, and Terence C. Halliday. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Pp. xii, 320. Index.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2020

David L. Sloss
David L. Sloss*
Affiliation:
Santa Clara University School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 114 , Issue 3 , July 2020 , pp. 549 - 554
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 by The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Transnational Legal Orders (Terence C. Halliday & Gregory Shaffer eds., 2015).

2 Craig, at 175, quoting Halliday & Shaffer, supra note 1, at 38.

3 Hathaway, Oona A., Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?, 111 Yale L.J. 1935, 1940 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 See, e.g., Beth A. Simmons, Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (2009) (concluding that ratification of human rights treaties has the greatest positive impact in countries that are neither stable democracies nor stable autocracies).

5 See generally The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study (David Sloss ed., 2009).

6 See generally National Treaty Law and Practice (Duncan B. Hollis, Merritt R. Blakeslee & Benjamin Ederington eds., 2005).

7 See John Dugard, South Africa, in Sloss, supra note 5; Mónica Pinto & Nahuel Maisley, From Affirmative Avoidance to Overriding Alignment: The Engagement of Argentina's Supreme Court with International Law, in Engagement of Domestic Courts with International Law (André Nollkaemper, Antonios Tzanakopoulos & Yuval Shany eds., forthcoming 2020, on file with author).

8 In addition to Chapter Four in this volume, see Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom & Simmons, Beth, Getting to Rights: Treaty Ratification, Constitutional Convergence, and Human Rights Practice, 54 Harv. Int'l L.J. 61 (2013)Google Scholar.