Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:45:49.855Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Marian Nash(Leich)
Marian Nash(Leich)*
Affiliation:
Department of State
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , July 1996 , pp. 442 - 455
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dept. of State File No. P96 0029-1137/1139.

2 page 915 note F.Supp. 681 (D.N.J. 1996).

The United States obtained a temporary stay against the discharge order. After a hearing, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ordered the plaintiffs release under conditions, including house arrest and electronic monitoring, and later modified certain of its requirements. Ruiz Massieu v. Reno, No. 96-5125 (3d Cir. Mar. 5 and 20, 1996).

1 Pub. L. No. 103-236, 108 Stat. 382, 394 (1994).

2 page60note Fed. Reg. 51,721–22 (1995).

1 Dept. of State Files L/T.

2 Russ. Fed. Ministry of Foreign Aff. note No. 11/Ugp (Jan. 13, 1992).

3 See U.S. Embassy Moscow to Dept. of State, telegram No. 01654 (Jan. 17, 1992).

1 page 32 note Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc. 374 (Mar. 4, 1996).

2 Id. at 381.

3 Id. at 381–82.

4 UN Doc. S/PRST/1996/9 (1996).

5 Dept. of State File No. P96 0031-1174/1175.

6 Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc., supra note 1, at 394–95; 61 Fed. Reg. 8843 (1996). For the President’s message transmitting the proclamation to Congress, see Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc., supra, at 395.

7 Pub. L. No. 104–114, 110 Stat. 785 (1996).

8 page 110 note Stat. at 786–88.

9 Id. at 788–89.

* Editor’s note: For analysis and discussion of the Helms-Burton Act, see Andreas F. Lowenfeld, Congress and Cuba: The Helms-Burton Act, supra p. 419; and Brice M. Clagett, Title III of the Helms-Burton Act Is Consistent with International Law, supra p. 434.

1 page 7 note Dept. St. Dispatch 44 (1996).

2 Pub. L. No. 104-107, 110 Stat. 704, 723 (1996).

3 See, e.g., 2 Cumulative Digest of United States Practice in International Law, 1981–1988, at 2606–08.