No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
1 As far as monographs are concerned, see in particular Golsong, Das Bechtsschutzsystem der Europä Menschenrechtskonvention reviewed by Sohn in 57 A.J.I.L.168 (1963); Eobertson, Human Bights in Europe, and Vasak, La Convention Europdenne des Droits de I'Homme, reviewed by Schwelb in 58 A.J.I.L. 1053 (1964), and 60 ibid. 145 (1966), respectively.
2 18 International Organization 561 (1964).
3 See Robertson in 1950 United Nations Yearbook on Human Eights 419.
4 The Communist Party of Germany, Max Reimann and Walter Fisch v. The Federal Republic of Germany, July 20, 1957, European Commission of Human Eights, Documents and Decisions, 1955-1956-1957, p. 222. For another critical comment on the decision see Schwelb, loo. tit. note 2 above, pp. 567-572.
5 Gudmundsson v. Iceland, 3 Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Eights 394 (1960). For a critical analysis of the decision see Schwelb, , “ The Protection of the Bight of Property of Nationals under the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Eights,” 13 A. J. Comp. Law 518et seq. (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a defense of the Commission's ruling, see Böckstiegel in 20 Neue Juristische Woehensehrift 905 (1967).
6 Report of the 8th Session of the Commission on Human Rights (1952), Economic and Social Council, 14th Sess., Official Records, Supp. No. 4 (E/2256), par. 255; General Assembly, 16th Sess. (1961-1962), Official Records, Agenda item 35, Annexes, Report of the Third Committee (A/5000), pars. 61, 68 and 72. It is of interest to add that the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Art. 8 (2)) contains without change the text as in the European Convention.