Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:49:21.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ex Parte Tadayasu Abo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , July 1948 , pp. 722 - 723
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* “The dual citizenship concept in the field of international law (with which we are not here concerned) has to do with situations in which two different sovereigns may lawfully, within their respective territorial confines, claim citizenship of the same person, and he of them, and the international incidents and implications which result. Talbot v. Jansen, 3 Dall. 133, 164 . . .; Perkins v. Elg, 307 U. S. 325. . . . But that such a person may occupy a dual citizenship status, in the sense that he possesses simultaneously the citizenship of the sovereign state in which he is a domiciled native and that of a foreign sovereign as well, with all the attendant rights and obligations of both, is a principle to which no government would willingly subscribe” [footnote by Judge Goodman].