Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T04:46:56.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Arbitral Law and Procedure. J. H. Ealston. Boston: Ginn and Co. 1910. pp. xix, 352.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Edwin M. Borchardt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , April 1911 , pp. 534 - 538
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The principles laid down in sections 395 and 396 in the Kunhardt and Barrington cases differ from the principles applied by the recent Spanish Treaty Claims Commission, principle No. 8. See American Journal of International Law, October, 1910, pp. 810-11. The author considered the awards of domestic commissions beyond the purview of his work, although he has summarized a few of their awards. It is submitted that the awards of domestic commissions such as that under the Act of March 3, 1849 (Mexican claims), sind the recent Spanish Treaty Claims Commission are,fully as important for the purpose of ascertaining international arbitral law as those of strictly international tribunals. In all essential respects they are international tribunals, the only difference consisting in the national character of the judges.