No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
1 2001 ICJ REP. 40, para. 173 (Mar. 16).
2 Barbados v. Trinidad and Tobago, paras. 339–49 (LOS Convention Annex VII Arb. Trib. April 11, 2006), at <http://www.pca-cpa.org.
3 Citing in support Maurice, Mendelson, On the Quasi-Normative Effect of Maritime Boundary Agreements, in Liber Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda 177 (Nisuke, Andro, Edward, McWhinney, & Rüdiger, Wolfrum eds., 2002).Google Scholar
4 The obligation to find an equitable solution is one of result; Article 83 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea requires that delimitation be effected “on the basis of international law, as referred to in Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, in order to achieve an equitable solution.”
5 Eritrea v. Yemen, Second Stage, Maritime Delimination, para. 86 (Perm. Ct. Arb. Dec. 17, 1999), 40 ILM 983 (2001), at <http://www.pca-cpa.org.
6 88 AJIL 179, 179 (1994).