No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2017
1 E.g., U.S. v. Escamilla, 467 F.2d 341, 343 (4th Cir. 1972).
2 E.g., North Sea Continental Shelf Cases, [1969] ICJ Rep. 3.
3 E.g., Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, 18–19 Eliz. 2, c. 47 (Can. 1970).
4 Hambro, , Some Notes on the Future of the Antarctic Treaty Collaboration, 68 AJIL 217, 226 (1974)Google Scholar.
5 Cheng, , The Sino-Japanese Dispute Over the Tiao-yu-tai (Senkaku) Islands and the Law of Territorial Acquisition, 14 Va. J. Int. L. 221, 222 n. 2 (1974)Google Scholar.
6 But it is not flawless. Most of the 24 straight baselines listed in Part II, p. 84, were compiled by the Geographer of the U.S. Department of State, who has published additional known straight baseline claims not included in Part II. See Office of the Geographer, Bureau of Intelligence & Research, U. S. Dept. of State, Int. Boundary Study, Ser. A: Limits in the Seas, Nos. 1–56 (Jan. 21, 1970–Oct. 19, 1973) (a dozen more items in this series are contemplated in 1974).