Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017
1 Judith, Gardam, Proportionality and Force in International Law, 87 AJIL 391 (1993).Google Scholar
2 Christopher, Greenwood, The Relationship Between ius ad bellum and is in bello, 9 Rev. Int’l Stud. 221 (1983).Google Scholar
3 Yoram Dinstein, War, Aggression and Self-Defense 240 (4th ed. 2005).
4 Yoram Dinstein, War, Aggression and Self-Defense 211 (3d ed. 2001).
5 Mary Ellen, O’Connell, Enforcing the Prohibition on the Use of Force: The U.N.’s Response to Iraq’s Invasion of Kuwait, 15 S. Ill. U. L.J. 453, 479–80 (1991).Google Scholar
6 Ian, Brownlie, Humanitarin Intervention, in Law and Civil War in the Modern World 217, 224 (John, Norton Moore ed., 1974).Google Scholar
7 See also Mary Ellen, O’Connell, The Myth of Preemptive Self-Defense (2002), at <http://www.asil.org/taskforce/oconnell.pdf.Google Scholar
8 The National Security Strategy of the United States of America 15 (2002), at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.pdf.
9 Application (Oct. 21, 1999), Banković v. Belgium, App. No. 52207/99 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Dec. 12, 2001), excerpted in Mary Ellen, O’Connell, International Law and the use of Force 462, 472–74 (2005).Google Scholar
10 2005 World Summit Outcome, UN Doc. A/60/L.l (2005).