Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:27:56.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Part VI. Property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Extradition
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 29 , Issue S1: Supplement. Research in International Law Parts I & II , 1935 , pp. 219 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 219 note 1 Montevideo Convention of 1933, Art. 15, Appendix III, No. 6; Travers’ Draft of 1928, Art. 10, Appendix IV, No. 4; Draft of International Penal and Prison Commission of 1931, Art. 19, Appendix IV, No. 6; German-Turkish treaty, Art. 16, Appendix V, No. 3; Brazilian-Italian treaty, Art. 13, Appendix V, No. 4; French-Czeehoslovakian treaty, Art. 22, Appendix V, No. 5; Belgian-Polish treaty, Art. 11, Appendix V, No. 6; Colombian-Panama treaty, Art. 15, Appendix V, No. 7; French statute of 1927, Art. 29, Appendix VI, No. 6.

page 219 note 2 2 See, for example, the multipartite conventions in Appendix III, the United States-British treaty, Art. 12, Appendix V, No. 1; German-Turkish treaty, Art. 14, Appendix V, No. 3. But French-Czeehoslovakian treaty, Art. 22, Appendix V, No. 5, and Belgian-Polish treaty, Art. 11, Appendix V, No. 6, call for a request.

page 219 note 3 Article 12.

page 219 note 4 Article 15.

page 219 note 5 Pan American Convention of 1902, Art. 10, Appendix III, No. 3; South American Convention of 1911, Art. 12, Appendix III, No. 4; Bustamante Code of 1928, Art. 370, Appendix III, No. 5; Montevideo Convention of 1933, Art. 15, Appendix III, No. 6; Central American Convention of 1934, Art. 12, Appendix III, No. 7; United States-Austrian treaty, Art. 10, Appendix V, No. 2; Brazilian-Italian treaty, Art. 13, Appendix V, No. 4; Canadian statute, Art. 27, Appendix VI, No. 4.

page 220 note 1 South American Convention of 1889, Art. 39, Appendix III, No. 2; Travers’ Draft, Art. 10, Appendix IV, No. 3; Draft of International Law Association, Art. 15, Appendix IV, No. 5; Draft of International Penal and Prison Association, Art. 19, Appendix IV, No. 6; United States-British treaty, Art. 12, Appendix V, No. 1; French-Czechoslovakian treaty, Art. 22, Appendix V, No. 5; Belgian-Polish treaty, Art. 11, Appendix V, No. 6; Belgian law, Art. 5, Appendix VI, No. 2; Swiss law, Art. 27, Appendix VI, No. 13.

page 220 note 2 See the references in the footnotes above, and, generally, the multipartite conventions’ and drafts, treaties and statutes in Appendices III, IV, V and VI.

page 220 note 3 South American Convention of 1889, Art. 39, Appendix III, No. 2; Pan American Convention of 1902, Art. 10, Appendix III, No. 3; South American Convention of 1911, Art. 12, Appendix III, No. 4; Bustamante Code of 1928, Art. 370, Appendix III, No. 5; Central American Convention of 1934, Art. 12, Appendix III, No. 7; United States-Austrian treaty, Art. 10, Appendix V, No. 2; German-Turkish treaty, Art. 15, Appendix V, No. 3; Brazilian-Italian treaty, Art. 13, Appendix V, No. 4; French-Czechoslovalrian treaty, Art. 22, Appendix V, No. 5; Belgian-Polish treaty, Art. 11, Appendix V, No. 6; Finnish-Netherland treaty, Art. 10, Appendix V, No. 8: Belgian law, Art. 5, Appendix VI, No. 2; Canadian law, Art. 27, Appendix VI, No. 4; French law, Art. 29, Appendix VI, No. 6; Swedish law, Art. 26, Appendix VI, No. 12; Swiss law, Art. 27, Appendix VI, No. 13.

page 220 note 4 South American Convention of 1911, Art. 12, provides for delivery of property “asfar as this is practicable and in conformity with the laws of the respective nations.” Appendix III, No. 4. The Bustamante Code of 1928, Art. 370, is similar. Appendix III, No. 5. The Central American Convention of 1934, Art. 12, provides for delivery of property “upon the order of competent authority.” Appendix III, No. 7. By the United States-British treaty, Art. 12, delivery of property is to be made “in so far as this may be permitted by the law of the High Contracting Party granting the extradition,” while the United States-Austrian treaty says such delivery is to be made “so far as practicable” according to the law of the parties. Appendix V, Nos. 1 and 2. The German-Turkish treaty (Art. 14) provides for delivery of property if “the competent authorities have no objection,” Appendix V, No. 3, and the Finnish-Netherlands treaty (Art. 10) says: “if the competent authority of the State applied to so orders.” Appendix V, No. 8.

page 221 note 1 French-Czechoslovakian treaty, Art. 22, Appendix V, No. 5, and Belgian-Polish treaty, Art. 11, Appendix V, No. 6.

page 221 note 2 Brazilian-Italian treaty, Art. 13, Appendix V, No. 4.

page 221 note 3 German-Turkish treaty, Art. 15, Appendix V, No. 3.

page 221 note 4 Netherlands, Act of April 6, 1875, Art. 12; Panama, No. 44, Nov. 22, 1930, Art. 15; Peru, Extradition Law, Oct. 23, 1884, Art. 10; Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, which adopted the Russian Penal Code of 1914, Art. 852 (n).