Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:14:18.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Periodical Peace Conferences *

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

M. Jarousse de Sillac
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“ The law of nations is naturally based upon the principle that different nations in time of peace shall do each other the most good and in time of war the least evil possible.” — Montesquieu, Esprit des Lois, iii. I.

When Count Mouravieff, at the order of the Emperor of Russia, convoked the first peace conference by the circular of the 12th/24th August, 1898, hardly any one foresaw the importance which this first move was to take, which seemed then in the opinion of the writer Mommsen like “ a printer’s error in the history of the world.”

In order to realize the extent of the development to which coming periodical peace conferences are destined it is sufficient to examine the facts of yesterday and the road already traversed.

The object of the first Russian project was very limited; its purpose was to call together a certain number of Powers to study the possibility of “ putting a limit ” on armament for the purpose of diminishing the financial burdens of the states, but the exchanges of opinion which preceded the assembly of these “ disarmament conferences ” having shown that the chances of success were very feeble, a second circular by Mouravieff (January 11, 1899) extended the first program by attaching thereto particularly “the possibility of preventing armed conflicts by pacific means ” and the reduction of “ the laws and customs of war ” to a system of rules. These two new subjects changed the character of the assembly, the title of which even was modified. It was called thenceforth the “ Peace Conference.” And, in fact, the conference in obedience to the very force of things soon completed the transformation of accession to principle, subordinated the premature question of disarmament, and applied its efforts towards justifying its title by concentrating all its force on the matter of pacific adjustment of international conflicts.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1911 , pp. 968 - 986
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Translated from the French by courtesy of Mr. Clement L. Bouvé, of the District of Columbia Bar.

References

1 Temps, May 15, 1899.

2 See the 4th article of the Final Act of the 18th of October, 1907. [The Hague.]

3 Cf. G. Mooh, Du Droit de Legitime Défense, 1910.

4 See N. Politis, “The Future of Mediation,” Revue de Droit International Public, 1910, p. 136.

5 “Declaration” annexed to the treaty of obligatory arbitration concluded November 18, 1910, between Italy and Belgium.

6 This is what happened to the convention relating to prize courts adopted by thirty-three states only tad nevertheless inserted in the acts of The Hague.

7 The official name of this bureau according to the convention of 1907 is “The International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration.”