Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:34:07.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Report on the Eleventh Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2017

Philip W. Amram
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Comments
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , July 1969 , pp. 521 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © The American Society of International Law 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Amram, “Report on the Tenth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law,” 59 A.J.I.L. 87 (1965).

2 Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Arab Eepublic, United Kingdom, United States, Yugoslavia.

3 The United States Delegation consisted of Ambassador Kichard D. Kearney, as chief, James C. Dezendorf, Esq., Professors Kurt H. Nadelmann, Willis L. M. Reese and Arthur T. von Mehren and the writer.

4 The writer is the Society's representative on that Committee,

5 8 Int. Legal Materials 31-41 (1969).

6 Sherrer v. Sherrer, 334 U. S. 343 (1948). If the defendant appears and has an opportunity to attack the plaintiff's domicile or the jurisdiction of the court and fails to do so, or does so and loses the attack, the decree is final and is entitled to full faith and credit. The defendant is estopped to attack domicile or jurisdiction collaterally in another State. See also Cook v. Cook, 342 U. S. 126 (1951); Sutton v. Leib, 342 U. S. 402 (1952).

7 See Amram, “The Proposed International Convention on the Service of Documents Abroad,” 51 A.B.A.J. 650 (1965).

8 P.L. 90-578.

9 See, among others, the articles of Kurt H. Nadelmann in 58 A.J.I.L. 724 (1964); 60 A.J.I.L. 803 (1966); 67 Col. Law Bev. 995 (1967); 1967-1968 Common Market Law Rev, 409.