No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Second Circuit Affirms Orders Requiring Argentina to Treat Restructured and Holdout Bondholders Equally; Argentina Seeks Certiorari in Related Extraterritorial Discovery Case
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
- Type
- Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2013
References
1 NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina, 727 F.3d 230 (2d Cir. 2013); see Tom Hamburger & Carol D. Leonnig, U.S. Ponders Position in Argentine Debt Suit, Wash. Post, July 13, 2013, at A4; Peter Eavis, Hedge Funds Win Ruling in Argentina Bond Case, N.Y. Times, Aug. 24, 2013, at B1.
2 Floyd Norris, Not Crying for Argentina but Fearful of a Ruling, N.Y. Times, Aug. 30, 2013, at B1.
3 NML Capital, 727 F.3d at 737.
4 [Editor’s note: see Peter Eavis, Banks Fear Court Ruling in Argentina Bond Debt, N.Y. Times, Feb. 26, 2013, at B 1; Emily Schmall, Argentina: U.S. Court Orders Debt Repayment Plan, N.Y. Times, Mar. 2, 2013, at A5.]
5 NML Capital, 727 F.3d at 240–41.
6 Id. at 247–48.
7 EM Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina, 695 F.3d 201 (2d Cir. 2012); see Crook, John R., Contemporary Practice of the United States, 107 AJIL 207, 219 (2013)Google Scholar.
8 Petition for Writ of Certiorari at i, Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., No. 12-842 (U.S. Jan. 2013), available at http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Final-Petition.pdf
9 Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, Ltd., 133 S. Ct. 1855 (Apr. 15, 2013) (inviting solicitor general’s brief in Case No. 12-842).