Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:38:51.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shacghnessy v. U. S. ex rel. Mezel. 73 S. Ct. 625; 345 U. S. 206

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2017

William W. Bishop Jr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial Decisions
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , July 1953 , pp. 493 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 In Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding, 73 S. Ct. 472, 344 U. S. 590 (Feb. 9, 1953), the Court held than an alien seaman, admitted as a lawful permanent resident, could not be excluded upon returning from a voyage, without a fair hearing, including notice of the charges against him and an opportunity to be heard in opposition to them, despite the Attorney General’s attempt to exclude and deport him on the basis of confidential information the disclosure of which would not be to the public interest. He was held to be “entitled to due process without regard to whether or not, for immigration purposes, he is to be treated as an entrant alien.”

2 Black and Douglas, JJ., dissented.