Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:52:06.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bureaucrats, Legislators, and the Size of Government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Gary J. Miller  and
Terry M. Moe
Gary J. Miller
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Terry M. Moe
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some recent theories have blamed the growth of government on budget-maximizing bureaucrats who are assumedly capable of imposing their most preferred budget-output combination on legislatures, subject to cost and demand constraints. However, theoretical examination of the range of bargaining outcomes that might occur between bureau and legislature shows that budget-maximizing behavior does not necessarily lead to super-optimal levels of production, nor do the suggested reforms of competition and privatization necessarily improve the situation. In this bargaining model, the central determinants of governmental growth are not budget-maximizing bureaucrats, but the legislature's decisions regarding mode of oversight and form of internal organization.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 297 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlbrandt, R. S. Jr.Efficiency in the provision of fire services. Public Choice, 1973, 19, 1–42.Google Scholar
Arnold, D.Congress and the bureaucracy. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Borcherding, T. E. (Ed.). Budgets and bureaucrats: the sources for government growth. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Breton, A., & Wintrobe, R.The equilibrium size of a budget-maximizing bureau: a note on Niskanen's theory of bureaucracy. Journal of Political Economy, 1975, 82, 195–207.Google Scholar
Cowart, S. C.Representation of high-demand constituencies on review committees. Public Choice, 1981, 37, 337–342.Google Scholar
Davies, D. G.The efficiency of public versus private firms: the case of Australia's two airlines. Journal of Law and Economics, 1971, 74, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeAllesi, L.An economic analysis of government ownership and regulation: theory and the evidence from the electric power industry. Public Choice, 1974, 19, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, L. C., & Schott, R. L.Congress and the administrative state. New York: Wiley, 1979.Google Scholar
Fenno, R. F. Jr.The power of the purse: appropriations politics in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown, 1966.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, J. A.Pork barrel politics. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M.Congress: keystone of the Washington establishment. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M., & Noll, R. G.Voters, bureaucrats, and legislators: a rational choice perspective on the growth of bureaucracy. Journal of Public Economics, 1978, 9, 239–253.Google Scholar
Hardin, C. M., Shepsle, K., & Weingast, B. R.Public policy excesses: government by congressional subcommittee. St. Louis: Washington University Center for the Study of American Business, Formal Publication No. 50, 1982.Google Scholar
Hammond, T., & Knott, J.A zero-based look at zero-based budgeting. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1980.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. M., & Quandt, R. E.Micro-economic theory: a mathematical approach (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.Google Scholar
Liske, C., & Rundquist, B.The politics of weapons procurement: the role of Congress. Denver: University of Denver Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. J., & Weaver, C. L.Monopoly bureaus and fiscal outcomes: deductive models and implications for reform. In Tullock, G. & Wagner, R. (Eds.), Deductive reasoning in the analysis of public policy. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath, 1978, pp. 141–165.Google Scholar
Migue, J. L., & Belanger, G.Towards a general theory of managerial discretion. Public Choice, 1974, 17, 27–43.Google Scholar
Miller, G. J.Bureaucratic compliance as a game on the unit square. Public Choice, 1977, 29, 37–52.Google Scholar
Niskanen, W.Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1971.Google Scholar
Orzechowski, W.Economic models of bureaucracy: survey, extensions, and evidence. In Borcherding, T. (Ed.), Budgets and bureaucrats. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1975, 229–259.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., & Ostrom, V.Public choice: a different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 1971, 57, 302–316.Google Scholar
Pyhrr, P. A.Zero-based budgeting: a practical tool for evaluating expenses. New York: John Wiley, 1973.Google Scholar
Romer, R., & Rosenthal, H.Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo. Public Choice, 1979, 33, 27–43.Google Scholar
Savas, E. S.Solid waste collection in metropolitan areas. In Ostrom, E. (Ed.), The delivery of urban services. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications, 1976, pp. 201–229.Google Scholar
Savas, E. S. (Ed.). Alternatives for delivering public services: toward improved performance. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Savas, E. S.Privatizing the public sector: how to shrink government. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House Publishing, 1982.Google Scholar
Schick, A.The road to PPB: the stages of budget reform. Public Administration Review, 1966, 26, 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, K. A., & Weingast, B. R.Political preferences for the pork barrel: a generalization. American Journal of Political Science, 1981, 25, 96–111.Google Scholar
Spencer, B.Outside information and the degree of monopoly power of a public bureau. Southern Economic Journal, 1980, 47, 229–233.Google Scholar
Tullock, G.The politics of bureaucracy. Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Weingast, B.A rational choice perspective on congressional norms. American Journal of Political Science, 1979, 23, 243–262.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A.The politics of the budgetary process. Boston: Little, Brown, 1964.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.