Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2020
Gun violence is a large and growing problem in the United States. Many reformers look towards elections to spur policy change in this area. In this paper, we explore the effects of school shootings on electoral mobilization and election outcomes. We pair data from several sources that measure validated voter registration; validated voter turnout; and the electoral performance of officials at the local, state, and federal levels with regression discontinuity and panel methods. Our effects show that shootings have little to no effect on electoral outcomes in the United States. Our work demonstrates that even when tragic events occur that are squarely in the realm of elected officials’ responsibility, have high levels of issue salience, are highly-covered by the media, draw citizens’ attention, and (perhaps) shift public opinion, these seemingly favorable conditions may not be enough to elicit democratic accountability.
We wish to thank the Data Trust for sharing access to their data and to Matt Easton, Chase Fowers, Brittany Bair, Drew Brown, and Madeline Beck for their research assistance. We also wish to thank the National Science Foundation (SES-1657821) for funding this project. We are grateful to Jack Beaumaster, Delton Daigle, Bradley Jones, Cecillia Mo, Judith Torney-Purta, Dan Smith, and Michael Herron and audiences at Brigham Young University, the University of Virginia, as well as and the 2019 MPSA and APSA conferences for feedback on this paper. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/YF761K.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.